it's Darwin at work...
Posted on 10/26/2016 5:44:43 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Until now, infertility - the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex - was not considered a disability.
But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children - will now be equally classified as disabled.
WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
Pandering to Muslims here.
Soon a sexual partner will become an entitlement to be provided by government.
wonderful!
where do I sign up for my ATD welfare cheques?
The Globalists are of two minds on this. They also have Agenda 21 which is aimed at killing off most of the human race so that the surviving Elitists can live on enormous estates without so much rabble around.
Maybe they can purchase a robotic sexual partner on Amazon and have taxpayers pay for this toy.
That’a one back-handed diagnosis....
In countries driven into Islamic dhimmitude, that entitlement will be a personal human sex slave. In technological countries that resist Islam, that entitlement will be a government provided sex droid.
There will be a cultural gulf.
it's Darwin at work...
A dedicated Teamsters union worker was attending a convention in Las Vegas and decided to check out the local brothels. When he got to the first one, he asked the Madam, ‘Is this a union house?’ ‘No,’ she replied, ‘I’m sorry it isn’t.’
‘Well, if I pay you $100, what cut do the girls get?’ ‘The house gets $80 and the girls get $20,’ she answered. Offended at such unfair dealings, the union man stomped off down the street in search of a more equitable, hopefully unionized shop.
His search continued until finally he reached a brothel where the Madam responded, ‘Why yes sir, this is a union house. ‘We observe all union rules.’
The man asked, ‘And if I pay you $100, what cut do the girls get?’ ‘The girls get $80 and the house gets $20..’ ‘That’s more like it!’ the union man said. He handed the Madam $100, looked around the room, and pointed to a stunningly attractive green-eyed blonde .
‘I’d like her,’ he said. ‘I’m sure you would, sir,’ said the Madam. Then she gestured to a 92-year old woman in the corner, ‘but Ethel here has 67 years seniority and according to union rules, she’s next.’
“Maybe they can purchase a robotic sexual partner on Amazon and have taxpayers pay for this toy.”
Sorry this is the government we’re talking about. You’ll have to check one out at social services after it’s been returned by the last user.
LOL!
You’ll be given an “EBT” card...
Electronic Brothel Transfer card
Great, one more chance to screw people over.
Virtually nothing about the progressive agenda makes sense, nor is it even consistent. The same people who say this also say we should stop reproducing to control population growth and they also support the homosexual agenda.
Charisma goes a long way. 
And is it retroactive?!
A right to reproduce is immoral. It can lead to:
* encapsulating gestational surrogacy law in nations that don’t want it to supply children to those who don’t want it
* legalizing prostitution so single men can use them
* outlawing requirements for birth control if you’re on welfare or unable to care for the children you have
At some point not long ago (i’m not sure if it still holds) in Germany, if a woman was unemployed and fitting legal prostitution work was available, she could be compelled to take the work (or lose benefits).
How long until “right to a procreative partner” becomes “state compelled marriage”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.