Skip to comments.
US certain that WikiLeaks is part of Putin’s propaganda machine
fudzilla.com ^
| 17 October 2016
| Nick Farrell
Posted on 10/20/2016 9:28:10 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Assanges US hate has got the better of him
Remember the days when Wikileaks did decent work and provided a valid channel for whistleblowers? Well it looks like those days have long gone and the outfit has become a tool of Tsar Putins propaganda machine.
In the good-old days, Wikileaks actually was impartial and careful. Sure it tended to expose US atrocities but that was because there were more of them.
But now there is mounting evidence that the Russian government is supplying WikiLeaks with hacked emails as part of a plan to game the US election and put an oligarch friendly candidate into the White House.
While the allegations are coming from the Clinton campaign they are also being made by security companies and government officials.
One US official told CNN that the methods of the disclosures suggest Moscow is at least providing the information or is possibly directly responsible for the leaks. US intelligence officials are still investigating the degree of connection between Russia and WikiLeaks but they remain confident that Russia is behind the leaks themselves.
The Director of National Intelligence, which represents 19 US intelligence agencies including the Department of Homeland Security leveled unambiguous charges against Russia.
Meanwhile Wikileaks, or the Russians have been tipping off the Trump campaign. Roger Stone, a long-time adviser to Republican nominee Donald Trump, clearly had advance knowledge of the recent hack and publication of his emails on WikiLeaks. Of course he denied it.
Trump has called on Moscow to hack into Clinton's computers, downplayed criticism of Putin's authoritarian tendencies, tried to suggest that Russia hasn't hacked US systems and promoted foreign policy positions that jibe more closely with Moscow's than Washington's. He's relied on aides with ties to Russia and most recently, quoted and fake Russian news reports to raise questions about Clinton.
But in accepting the Russian emails, Assange has placed his organisation in a tricky place. Some of the emails are damaging to Clinton and should be looked at, but because the source is Russia, we cannot be certain if the emails are edited, taken out of context or even forged.
We are certain that a hack of the Republican servers would reveal similar emails, and if the Trump campaign server was turned over it would produce some pure comedy gold. Had WikiLeaks provided these, it would be seen as an effective tool for public information and there would have been no complaints.
Yet the fact that Assange has been unable to source this sort of material means that the Russians are not give it to him or would cut off his headline-grabbing Clinton emails gravy train. Assange might not care; he has made it pretty clear that he regards Clinton as responsible for him being locked up in the embassy something which is his own fault. However, as a long-term policy decision that hamstrings Wikileaks and weakens the information that is presented on the site. It makes him entirely dependent on state run spying operations and propaganda efforts.
The Russians failed last week to deliver the goods on Clinton and had to publish it themselves. The information was pure Putin propaganda. At least Assange had the good sense not to release that. But it is increasingly difficult to tell what is true and what is not on WikiLeaks.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; putin; trump; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The fact is:
SOMEONE IS DOING THE JOB THE FBI REFUSES TO DO.
2
posted on
10/20/2016 9:29:25 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
us libtards: we loved assange before we hated him.
3
posted on
10/20/2016 9:29:26 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The US is the one with the propaganda machine.
We won the Cold War, and ended up becoming the enemy ourselves.
4
posted on
10/20/2016 9:29:34 AM PDT
by
Shadow44
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This article is total garbage and propaganda.
I doubt there is one career (non-political) intelligence officer at Langley or any other intel agency that believes it.
5
posted on
10/20/2016 9:31:22 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(This space for rent--$250K)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
why should not the content of these emails have an effect on the election?
they are exposing massive corruption in our government.
omfg.
6
posted on
10/20/2016 9:31:36 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...One US official told CNN that the methods of the disclosures suggest Moscow...
Well I guess that settles that.
7
posted on
10/20/2016 9:33:11 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Time for a Tea Party II)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
how about “it is certain the the us media is part of hillary clinton’s propaganda machine?” to the point they admit they have lost all credibility - in leaked emails they would like to have kept hidden...?
8
posted on
10/20/2016 9:33:41 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
BS. Meanwhile, Russia is preparing for war and we just lost the Philippines. But lets play politics for Hillary.
9
posted on
10/20/2016 9:33:46 AM PDT
by
Williams
(The (republican) party is over.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
IF Russia is really involved in wikileaks...
And if all their propaganda machine is doing is just shining a light on what our leaders are really doing...
I don’t think I have a problem with it.
If both sides are evil, and they are only shining a light on one side, that would be bad. But I don’t think there is any way that Trump is nearly as bad as Clinton.
And nobody is accusing O’Keefe of being part of Putin’s propaganda machine.
10
posted on
10/20/2016 9:33:48 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The mounting evidence is that the Hillary Clinton Democratic Party machine is corrupt beyond anything possibly imagined to date.
There. Fixed it.
11
posted on
10/20/2016 9:33:57 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The title should read “The Corrupt Obama Administration, in an Attempt to Cover Itself, the DNC, and Hillary’s Fat, Lumpy A$$, Tries to Deflect Blame to Russia”.
Accurate but probably too long.
12
posted on
10/20/2016 9:34:08 AM PDT
by
WMarshal
(Trump 2016 - because the Demorats are criminals and the GOP is the Gang Of Pussies)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
FUDZILLA run by a rab from Hillary’s donors...
13
posted on
10/20/2016 9:34:30 AM PDT
by
straps
(1 each upset republican)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
FUDZILLA run by a rab from Hillary’s donors...
14
posted on
10/20/2016 9:35:00 AM PDT
by
straps
(1 each upset republican)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Prapaganda is the shit coming out of Hillary’’s mouth.
15
posted on
10/20/2016 9:36:31 AM PDT
by
broken_arrow1
(I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
During the investigation of Clinton’s e-mails, the Obama Administration repeatedly assured us that there was no evidence that any foreign power hacked her e-mails, and that our secrets were/are safe. When did this narrative change?
Now we are told, only months later, an opposite story: not only did foreign powers have access to her e-mails, but that the foreign powers were doing the hacking.
So, which is it?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
There is not a scintilla of evidence put forward by any agency that Russia is doing the hacking. Internet hacking has been going on for decades. Did Russia hack into Target servers?
17
posted on
10/20/2016 9:36:32 AM PDT
by
entropy12
(TRUMP/PENCE 2016!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They can’t defend the content of the emails, all they can do is whine about the source, and they don’t even know who the source actually is.
To: Diogenesis
A very famous historic figure once said "The truth shall set you free."
He was working for God.
19
posted on
10/20/2016 9:38:14 AM PDT
by
Bogie
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don't care if Putin, KJ-U, Iranian Mullahs and the ghost of Saddam Hussein sat around some backroom hacking away for months while living off Halal goat and ding-dongs, the fact is not ONE email has been proved fake or been rebutted. Shillary and her ilk can shriek all they want, they've been exposed and to shift the subject to subversion by a foreign government is frankly, an insult to Americans. They own this.
20
posted on
10/20/2016 9:38:16 AM PDT
by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson