Posted on 10/20/2016 8:16:40 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Abortion is murder most foul no matter what words you use to hide it.
well, they’re half right; it is truly scary
Well, at least they recognise that ripping fully developed babies from the womb will seem scary to a lot of folks, even if they don’t believe so themselves.
I’m not a debater but watching the first minutes of the debate last night was all I could stand. Trump missed so many opportunities particularly by letting Hillary frame the abortion issue as Women’s health rights and Planned Parenthood as the crusader for women’s health rights. An issue which has cost over 60,000,000 babies their lives already. The main argument was the late term issue. The facts about how many women choose abortion each year could have been brought out:
Are there that many women suffering from health problems related to their pregnancies? Or is it a means of birth control?
What is the cost to our nation- the loss of so many potential citizens, future employed, teachers, doctors, taxpayers.
Is this why so many people are needed from other countries around the world? Legal or illegal?
What about the loss of life and liberty of the aborted babies, denied their God given right to life?
That Planned Parenthood has engaged in the sale of the parts of aborted babies (not fetuses) like a slaughter house.
60 million babies? 10 times the number of Holocaust victims in our own country.
The other issue about the Second Amendment- Why is it important to even have a right to bear arms in this nation?
I have not watched the remainder of the debate, which I recorded, as I don’t have the stomach for it.
Did Trump win? From what I saw it appears that he let Hillary frame the issues narrowly. Doesn’t he have a real core of concern for these issues? Enough to have shown some emotion and passion? Unfortunately, he is not a ‘great’ communicator.
God help our nation.
FR POSTED
CDC: Nearly 13,000 Fully Developed Babies Aborted Each Year
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/20/cdc-nearly-13000-fully-developed-babies-aborted-annually/
“Scare rhetoric”?? How in the love of God do you make partial birth abortion sound pretty?
Hillary can’t handle the truth.
That was the best abortion responce seen a debate! Go Trump
She basically said, without saying it, she supports partial birth abortion.
Oh sure, there was abortionist Kermit Gosnell who ripped babies out of the womb FIRST - then proceeded to kill these living, kicking infants by severing their spinal cords at the base of their necks.
But that's still more the exception in abortion so-called "procedures" - most aborted children are first ripped apart inside the womb, then "extracted," body part by body part.
Just the facts.
I heard a professor mention the subject of debates this morning. He said that ‘you don’t have any freedom during a debate to states your positions’. That makes sense. He said the rallies offer the opportunity to do this. I have to agree. Trump does do this very well. So he must understand that the debates actually limit him.
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
I wouldn’t even post links to graphic descriptions of it here.
But, Trump might want to touch upon the details in his speeches, to refresh people’s memories of the same discussion many years ago and enlighten millenials.
Oh yeah. It is scary.
Especially scary when you think about what it is that YOU were supporting for how long, Hillary.
There’s a reason that the Law terrifies, Hillary.
You should be scared, Hillary. And not because you might lose the election, but because your lies won’t serve you when you’re facing the Lord on the Last Day.
God isn’t going to be fooled like your sycophants, Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.