Posted on 10/20/2016 8:16:40 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Donald Trump during the third presidential debate on Wednesday night said partial-birth abortion was “terrible” and “not acceptable,” but Hillary Clinton called his description of babies being ripped from the womb in the ninth month of gestation “scare rhetoric.”
The right to abortion, partial-birth abortion, funding Planned Parenthood and the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court featured prominently in the early stages of the debate in Las Vegas.
Clinton reiterated that her priorities when naming judges to the bench included the court not reversing Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in 1973.
Trump pledged to appoint justices who “will be pro-life,” “have a conservative bent,” and “interpret the constitution the way the founders wanted it interpreted.” …
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
How else do you describe unthinkable murder Killary?
That all depends on the amount of the check from Planned “Parenthood”.
Reality is terrible and unacceptable. Deal with it.
Hey, and it’s close to Halloween too!!
Except we do have hateful wicked witches here and hapless babies who are no less an appropriate target of love than the rest of humanity.
I hope she hangs herself with her public callousness.
it may be “scare rhetoric’ but it is 100 percent TRUE and ACCURATE
and THAT is the problem hiLIARy should be required to respond to
the SUBSTANCE of the issue, not just a fluffy evasive comment about debating style
A good follow-up to this on social media would be certain O’Keefe PP videos.
In a "partial birth abortion", the murderer pulls all but the baby' head out. She then stabs the baby in the back of the skull with surgical scissors, evacuates the baby's skull with a surgical suction machine, crushes the baby's skull with forceps, and then discards the baby's lifeless body as garbage.
How 'bout that, Hillary? I bet you CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!.
The abortion-winking crowd also knows that the question won’t stop there, so they have to mock and hoot at it early on.
Well what if a much of a which of a wind came along (apologies to “e. e. cummings”) and gave the truth to this lie. This is why, even in the relatively uncommon triage cases (life of mother), they don’t even bother to “put it out of misery,” they just chop.
Nothing terrifies the left like truth.
America needs to know the truth about it.
It is.
What it is.
Thank G-d SOMEONE finally had the “you-know-whats” to say it on National TV.
It is not scare rhetoric but destruction of verified witness and evidence.
Once one touches or visualizes the baby to ascertain its live existence, the baby is inherently certified as being alive.
However Democrats want us to live in the 1800s.
Besides, all Roe v Wade does as a legislation coming down from the sky (or from the bottom of hell) is allow the pimps and rapists to not pay child support while a woman is pregnant.
If Roe v Wade implies government should not decide in private health matters then why do we have all the other antigun legislations and Obamacare and then some?
Hillary’s appalled at “tearing apart immigrant families”, but she has no problem tearing babies apart and having Planned Parenthood sell the parts. No word captures the depths of her depravity.
Roe v. Wade turned people loose to do monstrous things.
Now we’re surprised to see that America is a monster mash.
Imagine how scary it is for those babies? She is despicable to defend killing babies like this.
I actually wanted Trump to be more graphic and say what you just did.
Most people have no idea how late term abortions are done.
I know I cried like a child when I saw Rick Santorum, many moons back , go through it while having a back and forth on the Senate floor with, none other than the baby-killing witch we just saw at the debate.
Maybe not, but the illogic is known as special pleading.
Abortion was first sold as being undertaken only early in the pregnancy, with medical safeguards for the mother, and to be used but rarely, with adequate counseling on all alternatives.
Then it grew into “abortion on demand”, i.e., for the “convenience” of the mother, at any stage up to and including actual delivery of the child (which was to be killed while still in the birth canal), and repeated as often as necessary for the continued “convenience” of the mother. To hell with this “counseling” business.
For some, it has become a ritual, the sacrifice to some pagan deity, for the expiation of real or imagined sins against “Gaia”. While there is “freedom of religion”, does this not approach criminal activity? Not just an approach, but actual engagement in a criminal act (the taking of an innocent human life)?
God is angry, but is still striving to bring a gracious answer to the scene. God is very, very notably slow to anger, and abortions don’t thwart His master plan. Nonetheless we are answerable for evils of commission and omission.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
