Posted on 10/20/2016 5:22:35 AM PDT by Donglalinger
RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 13 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
#HillaryClinton #imWithHer #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails13 0 replies 568 retweets 548 likes
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Gosh I hope they explicitly discuss voter fraud and how to do it.
PODESTA (giggle): "Monica's outside puckering up to see you, Mr President."
CLINTON: "Tell her to wait a sec till I unzip."
========================================
Podesta served as Counsellor to Obama.
"She actually got under his desk?"
"Yup, for about 15 minutes."
Good place to see what is in this batch:
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/
The “centipedes” at reddit are all over the released emails & there are links to previous batches as well. They did an outstanding job yesterday on the plot to sabotage Assange ..... some of the research was going on as info was being deleted. FR had a thread on it with the link to the reddit investigative work:
Source of Pedophilia Smears against Assange?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3482486/posts
From:doug@presidentclinton.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com, jpodesta@americanprogress.org
Date: 2011-11-17 12:50
Subject: Re:
Also I signed a conflict of interest policy as a board member of cgi On it, I wrote that my wife designs bags for cgi, and loses money doing so plus donating her time And that teneo represents 4 cgi sponsors, 3 of which teneo brought to cgi .
Oddly, wjc does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc
I could add 500 different examples of things like this and while I removed lasry bc they are all on the offense, I get the sense that they are trying to put some sort of wrong doing on me after the audit as a crutch to change things and if I don't mention things like lasry where they all have issues, I may regret it
Back to the top
Bttt
Okay, this one just struck me as funny (fund-raiser email for Hillary):
From:JPalmieri@americanprogress.org To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2008-07-31 18:24 Subject: FW: The person I most want to spend time with
seriously? this is the worst subject line ever in an email from Bill Clinton.
Band's outfit, Teneo, is considered the toll road to access the Clintons---for a fee paid to Band----said to be in the hundreds of thousands.
L/E recognizes multiple communications as evidence of money-laundering and tax evasion.
According to the email, they know that of course POTUS knew about her server and were trying to figure out how to spin it when they got caught.
One of us should connect with the WH just so they know that the email will show his statement to not make sense. I'm happy to do so to Josh Earnest since Jen is in a weird position
Anyone else wondering, though, if the dumps occurring after Assange got cut off aren’t just a way if making it seen like Wikileaks still has some power. Last few dumps have seemed SSDD.
Here’s the Clinton’s phone number in Chappaqua:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23166
Re: Chappie
From:ha16@hillaryclinton.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2015-08-01 20:30
Subject: Re: Chappie
its so crazy and maddening but i have been dealing with it with the lawyers for a while now. appreciate the note and sorry to add to the madness. chappaqua line is 914-861-3623
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:24 PM, John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com wrote:
On the number one front, no one I am with could figure out the story about you or why it was printed. So I guess that’s good news. On the less important front, I need to get WJC a WH message and don’t have the chappie > phone # with me. Can you send? Thx.
EXCERPT When Chelsea's hubby, and his partners began raising money in 2011 for a new hedge fund firm, Eaglevale Partners, a number of investors in the firm were longtime supporters of the Clintons, according to interviews and financial documents reviewed by The New York Times. Tens of millions of dollars raised by Eaglevale can be attributed to investors with some relationship or link to the Clintons.
The investors include hedge fund managers like Marc Lasry and James Leitner; an overseas money management firm connected to the Rothschild family; and people from Goldman Sachs, including the chief executive, Lloyd C. Blankfein. Some of the investors in Eaglevale have contributed campaign money to the former president and Mrs. Clinton. Some have also contributed to the familys foundation.
Identifying who put money into Eaglevale, a roughly $400 million fund that has had underwhelming returns for much of its brief history, is difficult because hedge funds do not publicly disclose their investors.
Still, the overlap between at least some of Eaglevales investors and backers of the Clintons illustrates how politics and finance can intersect and shows the fine line the Clinton family must navigate as their charitable and business endeavors come under scrutiny in an election cycle.
There are several examples of Eaglevale investors with relationships with the Clintons. Rock Creek Group, a Washington-based investment advisory firm, placed $13 million from the California Public Employees Retirement System and another public pension fund with Eaglevale in late 2011 and early 2012.
Rock Creeks chairwoman, Afsaneh Beschloss, attended state dinners at the Clinton White House in the late 1990s and was a panelist in the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative in September in New York. (Her husband, Michael, is a well-known presidential historian and occasional writer for The Times.) For a brief period in 2013, after Eaglevale had been up and running for about a year, Rock Creek sublet temporary office space to Mrs. Clinton after she stepped down as secretary of state.
Mr. Lasry, a co-founder of the big hedge fund Avenue Capital and a longtime friend and financial backer of both the former president and Mrs. Clinton, said he invested $1 million in Eaglevale. In an interview in his Park Avenue office, adorned with many photos of him with the former president, he said that he recommended that his relative by marriage, Craig Effron, another hedge fund manager, also invest in the fund. I gave them money because I thought they would make me money, said Mr. Lasry, whose $13 billion firm was one of the first places Chelsea worked after graduating from Stanford.
A number of other investors reached by The Times declined to be interviewed.
Rest here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/23/business/dealbook/for-clintons-a-hedge-fund-in-the-family.html?_r=0
A portion of this one was released earlier, but I hadn’t seen it mentioned. Here’s an interesting exchange Podesta had about their cover story for the homer server:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23327
On Oct 17, 2015, at 5:27 AM, John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com wrote:
Reluctant to go there. Makes it seem like she consciously went to the home server for security reasons which would fall apart under scrutiny.
On Friday, October 16, 2015, Roy Spence Roy.Spence@gsdm.com wrote:
IRS was hacked. I think the State Department was hacked. Sony hacked. Banks hacked. As we try and close the Benghazi Chapter and the email drip drip. Is there ever a moment in TiMe not to Defend the decision but layout the fact....HRC servers were not hacked. Know this is s naive thought but just thinking.
That’s weird. Ha16 has a HillaryClinton.com email addy, but doesn’t know/recall the phone number?
And did Podesta give out that particular phone number to someone who emailed him? Thru email? Jeez. If so, that just seems really stupid to me, from a security standpoint anyway.
Ha16 I assume is Huma.
So Podesta didn’t recall the number. That’s weird, too. Or that he didn’t have it saved on his phone, or in an address book on his computer. Heck, for all Ha16 knew, it could’ve been anyone on the other end if that email. Why not just call him/txt him with the unfo. Think that would be safer security-wise.
Direct link to WikiLeaks Directory
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
This one’s a keeper: Time for Podesta divorce proceedings
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22197
“Hi John, Hmmm so since this is my first Speed Dating experience I have no idea what one is supposed to say in a ‘Hi There’ follow up email thingy. I’m not even sure what the etiquette is, is there a polite waiting period? At any rate, I was glad to have received your details in the email as you seemed lovely! I would like to catch up again, if you’d like to. That’s pretty much it. Hope you are enjoying your Saturday! Happy last week of term! Cheers Kim”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.