1 posted on
10/19/2016 10:39:55 PM PDT by
fuente
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: fuente
At this point, what difference does it make?
2 posted on
10/19/2016 10:41:23 PM PDT by
MrChips
(Ad sapientiam pertinet aeternarum rerum cognitio intellectualis - St. Augustine)
To: fuente
That’s what Hannity’s guest just said, that she gave up our nuclear response times and it’s classified.
3 posted on
10/19/2016 10:41:58 PM PDT by
Kenny
To: fuente
Would she do something like that? BWAHAHAHA! Of course she would!
4 posted on
10/19/2016 10:42:48 PM PDT by
teletech
To: fuente
Trump hammers her on her “poor judgment”.
There it is.
5 posted on
10/19/2016 10:44:34 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
To: fuente
When reached for comment, Patient X said, “Eh, what difference could it possibly make now?”
6 posted on
10/19/2016 10:45:25 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(20 days: Until Presdient Pre-elect becomes President Elect Donald J. Trump. Help is on the way!)
To: fuente
10 posted on
10/19/2016 10:50:52 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(“Christian faith is not the past but the present and the future. Make it stronger. "DJT)
To: fuente
How long does it take from the time she needs to make the decision to launch until Dr. Feelgood can get her mind clear enough to make that call?
11 posted on
10/19/2016 10:51:00 PM PDT by
digger48
(Deplorables Unite)
To: fuente
The Powers-That-Be will simply declassify that info. Problem solved for Hillary.
12 posted on
10/19/2016 10:51:05 PM PDT by
kevao
(Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
To: fuente
To: fuente
"Early in this evening's debate Hillary emphatically mentioned nuclear response times. She is someone that should know that information. That gets to operational knowledge and capabilities of our nuclear assets. This is typically highly sensitive (classified) information."
If true, don't let the LMSM sweep it under the carper. Her long history of mishandling classified information is one of the primary arguments against a clinton presidency.
To: fuente
A divorce lawyer trying to impress others by blabbing client confidences would be disciplined.
So here the would-be president tries to scare us with the Rooskies, then blabs our nuclear response times. I’m sure this will be covered on all he networks
16 posted on
10/19/2016 10:55:58 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
To: fuente
No doubt there’s an “Idiot” protocol.
17 posted on
10/19/2016 10:56:53 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: fuente
Prosecute the prostitute!
To: fuente
Yes she did. The response times in the nuclear launch sequence is at least SECRET. Now I can neither confirm nor deny the validity of the number she said, but she should have her clearance pulled.
19 posted on
10/19/2016 10:59:12 PM PDT by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
To: fuente
Joe tells us where its at and she tells us Our response time,good People we have in charge, May God help us.
To: fuente
The Russians hacked her mouth and made her expose those response times, at the behest of Trump of course, because Trump & Putin are BFF’s.
To: fuente
when I heard her cite a specific time, I knew it was not a random number out of her braggadocio mouth but something too precise to be random.
25 posted on
10/19/2016 11:09:47 PM PDT by
llevrok
(je sui cou rouge !)
To: fuente
All I know is how crazy cnn.com is, ALL their post debate articles are timed. lol.
26 posted on
10/19/2016 11:13:25 PM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: fuente
27 posted on
10/19/2016 11:14:30 PM PDT by
LeoWindhorse
(America First !)
To: fuente
33 posted on
10/19/2016 11:27:58 PM PDT by
proust
(Trump / Pence 2016!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson