Posted on 10/16/2016 10:10:55 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Hashtag 'keys' likely have to do with this.
Roger Stone
1h
Roger Stone @RogerJStoneJr
John Kerry has threatened the Ecuadorian President with "grave consequences for Equador" if Assange is not silenced @StoneColdTruth
[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]
Roger Stone @RogerJStoneJr
45m
Reports the Brits storm the Ecuadorian Embassy tonite while Kerry demands the UK revoke their diplomatic status so Assange can be seized
[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]
Ok this is really really crazy...all these different Twitter reports of something big going down on Wikileaks. Yet nothing in the offical news.
Either we have some just crazy crazy wild total BS rumors coming via Twitter....or.... if something did in fact go down tonight and the official news is not covering it right now ..then its because someone doesn’t want it to br cover right now until all over they have their stories straight
Its 6:30 a.m. in the UK If this breaks in the morning after the fact...that to me would be ever more telling because now the main stream news is completely controlled by the government
This has got to be just some crazy more that’s gotten out of hand
Because if it was not this is been kept quiet for the moment then we are in a lot worse shape than we could ever imagine
Yes.
WTF ? Do you know how old the US Marine Corp is ?
I believe the other poster is referring to the “shores of Tripoli” portion of the Marine anthem.
This obviously explains the dead man’s “switch”
we are at a stage of high alert, between O’Keefe and Assange. God protect them both. I think the establishment has spent most of their false ammo. They only have war with russia and a grid attack left, besides the unspeakable which i won’t mention. Pray for our land, pray for Mr T
Fake
He is talking about Jeffersonian times, when the marines were newly formed.
If true it’s insanely wild because the releases are political. But I dont picture the British seizing an embassy?
This comment above was the post to which I was replying...(not to you)
It is not sophistry and I resent your comment...it is called being articulate...so as not to spread additional rumors...and I see posts saying the British seized the embassy—but we don’t know that...
Sorry but there is a difference in the 2 words...to seize denotes possession—as per dictionary.com...
To Seize: To take possession of by force or at will.
syn: take, seize, grasp, clutch, snatch, grab
To storm: To rush to an assault or attack.
syn: attack, assail, assault, bombard, storm
Are they now running the embassy because they are in control? If so, then that would be seizing it...No source has said that...However, it has been reported that they did storm the embassy—in an attempt to seize Assange.
I was not in any way diminishing the severity of what may have happened if they did in fact storm the embassy (I hope they did not). It is wrong, Kerry is a scumbag, hope they don’t buckle.
BTW, the ACTUAL tweet reads: Reports the Brits STORM the Ecuadorian Embassy tonite while Kerry demands the UK revoke their diplomatic status so Assange can be SEIZED
You really need to read what I was saying and to whom I was saying it before accusing me of sophistry—oh and consulting a dictionary would not be a bad idea either.
Demoncrap Ayatollahs
Again, the differences are academic at best. Only an inarticulate person or an attorney would pretend that here is the slightest difference between stormed and seized.
Armed men kick down the door and take what they want, kidnapping someone. And there you are, carefully explaining how that doesn’t mean the embassy was “seized”.
And I couldn’t care less if you resent it. It sounded ignorant Poindexter.
“Are they now running the embassy because they are in control? If so, then that would be seizing it”
If they walked in the door, and were in charge, for however short of a time, as in “everybody get your hands up, where’s assange?”.
That’s a seizure. Departure a few minutes later doesn’t change that.
prayers UP!!!!
Jeffersonian times, oh, like during FDR times and "the Japanese attack on Pearl Harber when the Pacific Fleet was newly formed"
Trump or death.....
What’s with all these fake twitter messages all of a sudden?
“Are they now running the embassy because they are in control? If so, then that would be seizing it”
If they walked in the door, and were in charge, for however short of a time, as in “everybody get your hands up, where’s assange?”.
That’s a seizure. Departure a few minutes later doesn’t change that.
Sort of like playing Telephone...Now some people are posting that Embassy was seized, and that is not necessarily true.
This is the thing about words...You don’t know for a fact that they even did walk in the door—that they did have possession for even a few minutes....Did they seize control? You don’t know, and you are making rumors with your assumptions...They may have attempted to storm the Embassy but were unsuccessful...At this point we just don’t know, which is why it is really smart to use the wording of the tweet—because they denote facts...Are you inarticulate or a lawyer?
Roger Stone likely knows, and he chose the words based on what he knows. Or is he inarticulate or a lawyer?
Thanks for butting in and totally hijacking my first reply which was not to you...you read it out of context as I was not certain the person to whom I was posting understood what the tweet said and perhaps did not seem to believe it could happen....
You act like some sort of military expert...Perhaps you are; however, clearly, you are not an English expert. Say what you will, but I disagree and I am sticking with the actual tweet wording so as not to spread rumors here or anywhere else.
Now you posted about this twice...You can keep posting to me all you want. However, I am done, and I am going to go back to Twitter t try to get an update...
How do you know they are fake?
Man if only subcutaneous rice did more harm....
The Clinton body count is long. Trump may not go there,and probably shouldn’t, but anyone who has paid attention during the past twenty years or so know it’s true.
If they go after him it will not be for “immediate extradiction”.
extradiction will not silence him
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.