Revelations such as this stopped being shocking a long time ago. The MSM doesn't even try to hide their allegiance anymore.
Collusion.
5.56mm
NYT==traitors to the Republic.
Re: FOR REVIEW: Statement for NYT story on Clinton Cash
From:craig@minassianmedia.com To: bfallon@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2015-04-19 22:29 Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Statement for NYT story on Clinton Cash
Looks good. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com wrote: All,
As you are all aware, Jo Becker from the NYT’s investigative unit is one of several reporters at work on stories based on material provided by the publisher of the upcoming Clinton Cash book. Jo’s story is scheduled to run in as soon as one week.
Separately, this afternoon, Amy Chozick from the NYT called us to indicate she had obtained a copy of the book on her own and intends to file a separate story tomorrow. Her story will not unpack all of the book’s claims — she will leave that to Jo. Instead, she will do a more process-y story about the book’s existence, the fact that the publisher has approached multiple media outlets in advance of the book’s publication to spoon-feed them some of the book’s research, and also remark on the fact that Rand Paul continues to drop hints about the book’s contents such that it appears they may be some coordination with individual Republican campaigns.
We think this story, though it was not originated by us, could end up being somewhat helpful in casting the book’s author as having a conservative agenda. Moreover, we think Amy is suspicious of the arrangements that the book’s publisher has reached with the various media outlets (including her own paper). In fact, Jo Becker is apparently trying to get this story killed because she thinks it will undermine her investigative piece later this month. But so far it is running in tomorrow’s paper.
Amy is seeking a response from us on what our approach is to the looming publication of the book and the apparently well coordinated rollout. We have drafted the below response, and wanted you all to see it and provide feedback before we sent it off. Please note, however, that in order to get the statement into the story, we probably need to provide it by about 8:30 tonight. So apologies for the tight turnaround, but here it is:
“We always expected that while Hillary Clinton was focused on how to help everyday Americans get ahead, the Republicans would focus their efforts on attacks rather than ideas. It appears that this book is being used to aid this coordinated attack strategy, twisting previously known facts into absurd conspiracy theories. It will not be the first work of partisan-fueled fiction about the Clintons’ record, and we know it will not be the last.”
Thank you,
Brian
Re: FOR REVIEW: Statement for NYT story on Clinton Cash
From:craig@minassianmedia.com
To: bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2015-04-19 22:29
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Statement for NYT story on Clinton Cash
Looks good. Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com wrote:
All,
As you are all aware, Jo Becker from the NYT’s investigative unit is one of several reporters at work on stories based on material provided by the publisher of the upcoming Clinton Cash book. Jo’s story is scheduled to run in as soon as one week.
Separately, this afternoon, Amy Chozick from the NYT called us to indicate she had obtained a copy of the book on her own and intends to file a separate story tomorrow. Her story will not unpack all of the book’s claims — she will leave that to Jo. Instead, she will do a more process-y story about the book’s existence, the fact that the publisher has approached multiple media outlets in advance of the book’s publication to spoon-feed them some of the book’s research, and also remark on the fact that Rand Paul continues to drop hints about the book’s contents such that it appears they may be some coordination with individual Republican campaigns.
We think this story, though it was not originated by us, could end up being somewhat helpful in casting the book’s author as having a conservative agenda. Moreover, we think Amy is suspicious of the arrangements that the book’s publisher has reached with the various media outlets (including her own paper). In fact, Jo Becker is apparently trying to get this story killed because she thinks it will undermine her investigative piece later this month. But so far it is running in tomorrow’s paper.
Amy is seeking a response from us on what our approach is to the looming publication of the book and the apparently well coordinated rollout. We have drafted the below response, and wanted you all to see it and provide feedback before we sent it off. Please note, however, that in order to get the statement into the story, we probably need to provide it by about 8:30 tonight. So apologies for the tight turnaround, but here it is:
“We always expected that while Hillary Clinton was focused on how to help everyday Americans get ahead, the Republicans would focus their efforts on attacks rather than ideas. It appears that this book is being used to aid this coordinated attack strategy, twisting previously known facts into absurd conspiracy theories. It will not be the first work of partisan-fueled fiction about the Clintons’ record, and we know it will not be the last.”
Thank you,
Brian
We face a number problems at this point in the race:
(1) There is so much damaging information about Hillary being introduced that it all blurs together. It becomes “white noise”.
(2) The negative stories about Hillary aren’t heard on the radio news during your commute to and from work. The stories are not on the evening news or in your newspaper. Only sites like Drudge and FR carry the real news.
(3) Many of the negative Hillary stories are complex and require more than two sentences to explain. Many folks can’t listen long enough to understand.
(4) The media and the DNC are masters at dishonest spin. They curtly mock, misdirect and dismiss the truth. The average Joe doesn’t know what to believe.
(5) The complex Hillary revelations are coming too late. It takes time for these stories to sink in. But “he groped me” sinks in instantly.
No different from Stalinist Russia or North Korea, the media totally and completely in the bag for the “Dear Leader” and all opposition must be crushed and destroyed which I have no doubt will include murder if she is “elected” which I put in quotations because you damn well know she will “win” through massive voter fraud. The game is beyond rigged, she has the entire media, the White house, the justice dept. totally in the bag for her.
Email mentions Amy Chozick from the NYTs. Mmmmm...
Amy Chozick, now where have I read that name before?
I remember :-)
An email to John Podesta dated March 23, 2015 offering her assistance.
(may have been posted elsewhere)
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4685
From:esepp@americanprogress.org
To: John.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2015-03-23 19:47
Subject: FW: getting together
From Amy Chozik, via your AmProg. Won’t add to your scheduling memo unless you have a burning desire to see her.
Hi John, Sorry I didn’t get to say hello in person today. Everyone rushed the stage and you were gone! I enjoyed the panel discussion....including hearing my hometown Mayor, Julian Castro. I wanted to say hello via email and propose that we grab coffee and sit down in person some time soon, either when you’re in NYC or when I’m in DC. Peter Baker and other colleagues speak highly of you, and I am really looking forward to hopefully working with you over the next couple of years.
All the best, Amy — Amy Chozick Reporter The New York Times Office: 212-556-7440 Cell: 718-715-8661
Less than 1 month later she (and by extension the NYTs) is helping the the The Godmother discredit CLINTON CASH.
I loathe these people
Ping for later
It’s leading up to 1984.
The New York Times collusion with the Hitlery Campaign indicts the ENTIRE MSM (which is just one reason they'd rather the conversation and narrative be about the fake Trump accusers.)
Trump is going to blitz Wallace and the media with these charges as well as their cover up of the indicting Wikileaks revelations.
