Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jake Tapper is Shocked, S.H.O.C.K.E.D, That Donna Brazile Would Tip Off Clinton On CNN...
Conservative Treehouse ^ | 10/15/2016 | Sundance

Posted on 10/15/2016 4:47:50 PM PDT by GilGil

FULL TITLE: Jake Tapper is Shocked, S.H.O.C.K.E.D, That Donna Brazile Would Tip Off Clinton On CNN Townhall Questions…

Back in March CNN held a Town Hall event with Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. Jake Tapper and Roland Martin were moderators. It is now confirmed that CNN’s Donna Brazile had an advance copy of at least one of the questions for Hillary Clinton and gave Clinton a heads’-up so she could prepare

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; bias; clinton; cnn; dncstrategy; election; hillary2016; mediabias; msm; tapper; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Start listening to the audio at the 5 minute mark. Jake Tapper is shocked! Really shocked! He tells us CNN has such high standards. He simply does not know how this could have happened. Seriously! You can't help laughing.

He is asked if an investigation will be launched and he just chokes on his words and avoids answering.

1 posted on 10/15/2016 4:47:51 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Good thing he had his DependsX2 Extra absorbents on..


2 posted on 10/15/2016 4:49:15 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I am simply amazed at his sense of outrage. They have such high standards but no investigation will be launched. Wow!


3 posted on 10/15/2016 4:51:02 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Didn’t I read in one of those emails that they referred to Jake Tapper as a d***? Maybe he’s seeing the light.


4 posted on 10/15/2016 4:51:33 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

So Jake, who at CNN past along the questions?


5 posted on 10/15/2016 4:54:02 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

So Jake, who at CNN past along the questions?

__________

What an interesting question. They don’t call it the Clinton News Network for nothing.


6 posted on 10/15/2016 4:55:06 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

While this is not directly related to the story here, I looked at the Washington Post’s Facebook posting of this story and among the comments was someone saying that they did not like the Wikileaks being talked about because that was stolen property and should be off limits for discussion and debate. Real chuckler, eh, lol?


7 posted on 10/15/2016 4:59:01 PM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Translation: Dear Mr. Podesta, I'm a journalist who'd like to tutor you on how to DEFEAT the people investigating your corruption. I'm unelected but I'm on YOUR TEAM. It might be unseemly, so if intead ya want me to rat to your BUDDY, the better to insulate you, then that's ok. I'll totally let you cuck my wife --give her a TOTAL creampie..!!

8 posted on 10/15/2016 5:01:57 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

Tapped is “shocked and outraged” that she got caught. Not that she did it.


9 posted on 10/15/2016 5:02:23 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I sure hope our enemies give shillary an advanced copy of their attack plans..../sarc


10 posted on 10/15/2016 5:03:48 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
So Jake, who at CNN past along the questions?

This happened in the passed, so what difference at this point does it make?

11 posted on 10/15/2016 5:05:02 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

While this is not directly related to the story here, I looked at the Washington Post’s Facebook posting of this story and among the comments was someone saying that they did not like the Wikileaks being talked about because that was stolen property and should be off limits for discussion and debate. Real chuckler, eh, lol?

______________

Judge Ferrer a Fox News contributor explained it like this.

If a burglar commits a crime by burglarizing a home and in the process discovers a dead body and then gets caught, the authorities will be prosecuting the burglar for burglary. At the same time the authorities will be interested in how the dead body got there and if another crime was committed.

In other words because a crime was committed, does not mean you can ignore other crimes that are discovered in the process of committing the original crime.

If the authorities could catch Assange they would prosecute him for Hacking and that by no means they can ignore new crimes committed by other parties when the original crime was committed.

That’s absurd.


12 posted on 10/15/2016 5:06:18 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

CNN several times each day lives up to its old nickname: Certainly Not News.

Certainly Not News (CNN nickname)

The Cable News Network (CNN), a 24-hour cable news channel, was founded by Ted Turner and first broadcast on June 1, 1980. The unflattering CNN nickname of “Certainly Not News” has been cited in print since at least 1993.

CNN has also been nicknamed the “Chicken Noodle News” (cited in print since 1981), the “Communist News Network” (cited in print since 1991), the “Clinton News Network” (cited in print since 1992), the “CIA News Network” (cited in print since 1997), the “Criminal News Network” (cited in print since 1998), the “Corporate News Network” (cited in print since 1999), the “Cartoon News Network” (cited in print since 2000) and “Crap Not News” (cited in print since 2007).

http://www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/certainly_not_news


13 posted on 10/15/2016 5:08:07 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (We are not electing a saint. We are electing an ass kicker! Vote for Trump! Defeat Illiarily!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

High standards? Jake let me break it to you.... there is a reason why trust in anything the media says has dropped to 6%. There is also a reason at Trump rallies that crowds chant “CNN SUCS!”


14 posted on 10/15/2016 5:18:33 PM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Totally uncalled for . . . we can get your meaning without the perversion. What is happening to our country that conservatives can get just as dirty and filthy and the vermin they are disagreeing with - and in such a way.


15 posted on 10/15/2016 5:22:30 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Question for Jake: Does the revelation that CNN gave questions to hillary before the debate make it harder for CNN to get hillary elected?


16 posted on 10/15/2016 5:23:53 PM PDT by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic
 photo bb089318-d8ff-4acc-9f58-2da83a6d9fbd_zpsayyqd7re.jpg
17 posted on 10/15/2016 5:29:38 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Would anyone be shocked if Chris Wallace gave the questions in advance to Hillary?

Pray America wakes


18 posted on 10/15/2016 5:29:49 PM PDT by bray (Because you would be in jail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Who you kidding?

Palmaro and Podesta wrote the questions
Wallace will just read them.

Wallace is as credible and Dan Rather.


19 posted on 10/15/2016 5:34:46 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Jake Tapper: all but adopted son of Marjorie Margolis Mezinsky, whose cast the deciding vote for the Clinton tax increase; whose husband ran a ponzi scheme, whose son is married to Chelsea; who managed to keep a 10 million home in NYC but lose billions in his own hedge fund.

Tapper also dated Lewinsky.

I suspect he is a little conflicted.


20 posted on 10/15/2016 5:35:04 PM PDT by Geoffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson