Posted on 10/14/2016 11:45:42 PM PDT by Mr. K
I woke up at 2AM to get a drink of water and saw "Breaking News" that Obama ordered the CIA to cyber-attack Russia in 'in response' to something or another...
But what the hell is Obama think he is doing?
he’s hoping to provoke something
did you miss hillary in the debates trying to paint the Russians as aggressive bad guys?
that ‘reset’ button was meant to restart the cold war... a time during which the dems made butt loads of cash and maintained the house and senate for decades
I had to dig through all the anti-Trump smears to find it.
They claim the CIA is going to do a cyber attack.
What happened to the NSA?
I am convinced there is some nasty behind the scenes inter-agency stuff going on in the swamps of DC.
people tell all your idiot neighbors or friends or relatives that voting for hitler is going to put us in open war if bammy doesn't do it before hand....
it's on them.....
The rumor is that evidence incrimitating Hillary and Obama is about to be leaked.
It would greatly hamper voter fraud reporting.
I saw that too. What are they talking about?
____________________________________
From the campaign trail, 2008...
A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.
The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:
Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.
First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]
Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.
I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.
I will not weaponize space.
I will slow our development of future combat systems.
And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.
Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.
You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.
Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090412030633/http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp
"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
__________________________________________________________
From Investor's Business Daily, Jan 2012:
Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.
It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.
He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 - linchpin of our missile defense - might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.
Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.
The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology. ..."
"In his signing statement, Obama said he would treat these legal restrictions as 'non-binding' and that 'my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 (sic) in a manner that does not interfere with the president's constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.'
Betraying our secrets is easy for a president who betrayed allies Poland and the Czech Republic to placate Moscow.
Poland was to host ground-based interceptors such as those we've deployed in California and Alaska, with missile-tracking radar deployed in the Czech Republic.
Obama pulled the plug when Moscow objected. Never mind, he said, we have a better approach: a four-phase plan that calls for using three versions of the Navy's Standard SM-3 interceptor missile that forms the backbone of its Aegis missile-defense system.
The fourth phase consists of a missile still on the drawing board scheduled for deployment by 2020, a version of the SM-3 called the Block IIB. It would intercept hostile missiles in the "early intercept" phase before an enemy missile could release its warheads and decoys. The Russians want the SM-3's secrets, and Obama appears to be willing to turn them over.
The president wants to save the New Start Treaty, which the Russians have threatened to abandon if we try to fully implement President Reagan's dream of defeating a nuclear missile attack.
Russia has unilaterally asserted that any qualitative or quantitative improvement in U.S. missile defenses would be grounds for withdrawal from the treaty.
Read More At Investor's Business Daily:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010912-597158-obama-gives-russia-missile-defense-secrets.htm#ixzz3jXmMbVwY
___________________________________________________
March 2012...
"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:
Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it's important for him to give me space."
Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ..."
Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."
Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."
"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." That statement tells us much about the president's mindset.
The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration.
Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president's comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.
In addition, there is the phrase "on all these issues," implying more is at stake than just missile defense."
Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn't be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
__________________________________________________________
and Zero says we live in "a swamp of crazy."
I'll take our swamp over his evil swamp any day.
He’s hoping to provoke something, thinking he’ll be able to manipulate the process, which is quite scary.
What’s even scarier is, this clown and his hand picked cadre of sycophangs in DOD and Intel apparatus, thinking they can match wits with a seasoned KGB agent and his boys. The Russians play for keeps. Obama will play until it gets too rough and then go enjoy a spiced, macchiato, chai, pumpkin latte with Reggie Love, Comey, Lynch, Brennan, and Ash Carter, all wearing their PJs.
If you just pay attention to the “Trump is a big meanie” thing and forget about Obama and Hillary’s “War with Russia” thing, you will feel a lot better ...
Given all that the Obama administration has done to strengthen the Russians, while they practically dismantled our military, it seems to me an obvious possibility that they (the Obama Admin) are deliberately trying to set us up for defeat.
Attacking Russia worked out well for the Nazis, just like it did for Napoleon 100 years earlier.
There is no "devastating cyber strike" on the Russians coming.
All that is coming from US intelligence agencies is an enormous pile of steaming BS, whose sole purpose is the reinforce the claim that wikileaks info is coming from the Russians.
This is nonsense.
We already know that the first round of wikileaks immediately after the 'rat convention came from within the DNC.
It doesn't make any difference where it's coming from. All that matters is the answer to one question: "Are the latest round of wikileaks true?" The answer to that question is clearly 'yes.' And that is why the US "intelligence" agencies are broadcasting this preposterous bilge.
I hope Putin authorizes .....
Where are you hearing that?
If the Russians were to just nuke Washington, and nothing else,,, I am not sure I would be so upset.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.