[pepsi_junkie]

Stay agressive on the issues, yes. Attack on e-mails and benghazi and the Clinton foundation and her lies and wall street speeches, yes! awesome! special prosecutor, jail, wonderful! full speed ahead!

Arguing with her over whether he or Bill Clinton is a bigger chauvinist? He should win that (Clinton raped and harassed) but he takes mega damage himself because of that tape. He may do it but I want him to win and I think it's best if he can get past the issue of that tape. If that means taking Bill's horrid treatment of women off the table and focusing on Hillary's incompetence and illegalities, so be it. But he will do what he wants to, regardless of what any of us say. I was speculating that he might want to get past this issue and Hillary might want to get past the bill issue and so they might have an unpoken detente ON THAT ALONE. That's all.

[grania]

We respectfully disagree. hillary is an enabler of the worst kind, and add to that her bragging about defending a rapist who assaulted a twelve year old. She's trying to frame herself as someone who has spent her "whole life defending children", for heaven's sake. Yet she raised Chelsea in the spotlight of accepting Bill's behavior with Monica. It's not acceptable that the voters see her as anything but what she is on that issue.

It's not an argument about "who's a bigger chauvinist". It's an issue of hillary the enabler more offended by Trump's words in private vs her husband's actions. Why would anyone not pursue that issue? If properly pursued, it will bring a percentage of those suburban woman's voters over to sanity.