Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wikileaks Releases Hillary Clinton Podesta Emails
Wikileaks ^ | October 7, 2016

Posted on 10/07/2016 1:57:48 PM PDT by Pinkbell

RELEASE: The Podesta Emails #HillaryClinton #Podesta #imWithHer https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/

(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillarysemails; podesta; podestaemails; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last
To: Pinkbell
Here's a good one. Link. Read the whole thing ... Emphasis added and redacted for brevity:

==

Iran Nuclear Deal

From:seizenstat@cov.com
To: Jake.Sullivan@gmail.com
Date: 2015-06-22 04:23
Subject: Iran Nuclear Deal

Dear Jake,

I have sent several detailed notes on the Iran nuclear deal, and will avoid repetition. But with the June 30 deadline fast approaching (although it may be extended), and with Hillary certain to be pressed on whether she supports the deal and will urge Congress not to disapprove it, I wanted to share a few thoughts.

1. This could well be a voting issue for many moderates in the Jewish community. The mainstream organized leadership will almost certainly oppose the deal, along with Israel and all the Republican candidates, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and perhaps Egypt.

2. While we cannot be sure until there is a final agreement, it appears that many of the open issues since the preliminary accord, may be resolved in Iran's favor:

(1) Enriched uranium will stay in Iran for dilution, rather than be sent to Russia or France for reprocessing.

(2) Sanctions will not be phased-out commensurate with compliance, as the US Fact Sheet indicated after the last "agreement", but may come off more quickly. This will transfer billions to Iran and enhance its funding for terrorism and its efforts to gain hegemony in the region.

(3) It is not clear what Iran will be required to do on PMD, if anything. This was required of Iraq by the UNSC in September 2002. Iran should be held to the same standard. They have yet to answer 11 of the 12 IAEA questions, yet UN sanctions will be lifted.

(4) Russia, China and Iran itself may be able to block "snapback" sanctions if there is a violation of the agreement. US companies will be disadvantaged compared to European companies, since many US non-nuclear sanctions will remain, while all EU sanctions are nuclear-related.

(5) Military sites (Parchin) are likely to be off the table for inspections.

(6) Iran will likely be able to do research on advanced centrifuges, which enrich more uranium more rapidly than the current generation. This would markedly reduce the breakout time in the last years of the accord. Presidenr Obama has conceded this point (e.g. David Sanger article in NYT, April 8, 2015)

(7) Iran will have an industrial size nuclear program, and will be left as a "nuclear capable state".

(8) Iran will be able to keep 1000 centrifuges at Fordo.

(9) Nothing in the agreement will limit its support for terrorism.

41 posted on 10/07/2016 2:36:24 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Has the ability to edit ourselves for spelling and grammar totally left my fellow FReepers? This thread looks like it was written by drunks.

There is a spell check button folks. Please use it.

42 posted on 10/07/2016 2:37:14 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Ted Kennedy burns in hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/370


43 posted on 10/07/2016 2:37:16 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (when the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you Leary is this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz
Where is that one?.......................... “Fifty percent of the population are illiterates!”.
44 posted on 10/07/2016 2:37:49 PM PDT by ColdOne ((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Hillary Clinton.....will stick a shiv into our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
HRC paid speeches (credit @Cernovich)

45 posted on 10/07/2016 2:37:59 PM PDT by Voluntaryist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

It won’t compete with what Trump said to Billy Bush In the Hollywood bus. Back of the day. First apology out of trumps mouth it’s so bad


46 posted on 10/07/2016 2:40:24 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Big email celebration.. their guy 'George' (first name basis with Stephanopoulos) they feel did a good job defending HRC against the evil uranium - cash deal author.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1986

47 posted on 10/07/2016 2:41:45 PM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: drewh

“...no time to hit the news cycles...”

This might work to Trump’s advantage if his campaign can find anything of significance in them (significantly bad for Hillary) and use it Monday before the enemedia can spin it.


48 posted on 10/07/2016 2:43:47 PM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Yeah... and we can drive our own cars and don’t have an entourage of 50 people cleaning up after us, and catching us when we freeze up in public.


49 posted on 10/07/2016 2:44:26 PM PDT by Ms Mable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

My quote was not perfectly accurate— sorry — but here is the source!! A good one!!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22


50 posted on 10/07/2016 2:45:14 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01

..no time to hit the news cycles...”

This might work to Trump’s advantage if his campaign can find anything of significance in them (significantly bad for Hillary) and use it Monday before the enemedia can spin it.
....
Sunday shows...debate

Trump and his team can body slam them.


51 posted on 10/07/2016 2:46:00 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
no time for the Billy Bush story or the apology to get traction before Sunday...Matthew will still be chewing up Georgia and the Carolinas!

Hillary will have to bring it up herself at the debates

52 posted on 10/07/2016 2:46:05 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Voluntaryist

*Clinton: “But If Everybody’s Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”*

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927


53 posted on 10/07/2016 2:46:27 PM PDT by Voluntaryist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz

Thank you.


54 posted on 10/07/2016 2:46:39 PM PDT by ColdOne ((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Hillary Clinton.....will stick a shiv into our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
A snippet from Assange.

- - - -

"As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment's review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as "baseless".

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: "Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): "John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign".



55 posted on 10/07/2016 2:47:49 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Hillary will have to bring it up herself at the debates
...Velcro may not be strong enough to hold her on next debate...her eyes may spin.


56 posted on 10/07/2016 2:48:22 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz

Lenin and Mao also used to say that, because it was understood that it meant “to rise in arms”. The use of the language faculty is so irrepleaceable that Cuban have placed great importance to it in their education system.

from that email.


57 posted on 10/07/2016 2:51:38 PM PDT by ColdOne ((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Hillary Clinton.....will stick a shiv into our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

What??? That has got to be fake! There’s no way they would’ve said that.


58 posted on 10/07/2016 2:52:04 PM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz; MagUSNRET

Read the initial posts, whiner do nuthin lazy posters


59 posted on 10/07/2016 2:52:30 PM PDT by advertising guy ( TRUMP , BUT VERIFY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
I don’t think the timing is quite the same as the regime doing its document dump. Wikileaks wants people to go through these - what better time than before the weekend?

That's actually quite a good point. Thanks for posting.

60 posted on 10/07/2016 2:52:54 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you should have endorsed. Big mistake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson