The Internet Takeover Is Happening

Youtube ^ | Stefan Molyneux

[Voluntaryist]

10 minute video from Stefan Molyneux

[matthew fuller]

I’m not so sure-

https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=104318&c=TX10MM

[SaveFerris]

[Just like when Hitler took control of Germany——ALL information was controlled that went to the masses and ANYONE who dare say the Truth was killed or put in prison or had to flee.]

That’s what the Tribulation, especially the Great Tribulation will be like. Only much, much worse.

[SaveFerris]

[Obama wants to head up the UN after he leaves office]

Yes, I’m kinda expecting that since Netanyahu already fought against it. Probably still does.

[Dallas59]

SO far no one has “slpained” HOW freedom of speech will be censored by ICANN or HOW the US government websites will be taken over.

[visualops]

it’s just unconscionable.
what we need now, is Trumpnet.

[visualops]

very true. I kinda wish, but sometimes not, that he would tell people why the globalists don’t care where the jobs are, or why people would sell out their own country. wall street makes money whether you are employed or not.
.

[gattaca]

bkmk

[caww]

It means the overseeing of all domains, addresses etc. are under the control of an unelected Internationl Board of Globalists whose agenda is to control commerce and all aspects of Communication on line....all directly associated with the UN, IMF, World Bank in one form or another.....

You cannot have a World Government Body without control of the Internet.....this is just one of the marbles rolling to meet that agenda.

[visualops]

I assume peer networks and multiple servers rather than few main arteries and servers. for instance the hack of yahoo was massive because so many other companies use their servers. my husband and I met on Dalnet back in the mid 90’s which was a network of chat servers people were running. so you could talk to people all over the world basically as long as you knew where to look. it’s a great way to communicate without prying eyes.

[caww]

BTW...this is ‘irreversible’....so once it's a go....it's a done deal period.

When the CEO was asked if ICANN was subject to the Constitution of this nation the answer was ...NO.

When he was asked if they would guarantee ICANN would not relocate to a foreign country...the answer was No.

[caww]

That’s just fluff to make it look like they’re doing something to stop it....where were they two years ago?

[hapnHal]

Judge Backs Obama on internet giveaway....

http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/obama-appointed-judge-lets-internet-giveaway-proceed/?cat_orig=world

[nutmeg]

Obama wants to head up the UN after he leaves office, this must have been the price. As Trump said today, someone is benefitting from this.

Interesting...

[visualops]

there is some concern over the domain names (top level) because there is no agreement in place to assure continued control over top level domains such as .mil, .gov, or country specific such as .us.
ICANN does control the naming. they do not control the physical internet. But we always say “oh well they would never do that”. and we know how that ends up.

[okie01]

That’s just fluff to make it look like they’re doing something to stop it....where were they two years ago? Running for re-election, promising to defund Obamacare.

[stockpirate]

The Texas judge is an Obama appointee, so I am sure you can conclude on your own is ruling today.......

[proust]

Nailed it.

[Teacher317]

Ted Cruz has been the leading voice of opposition on this for months, but he is not a Conservative, according to FR.

[Dallas59]

Lol...I remember the "whitehouse.com problem...

Part of the controversy about whitehouse.com was that users (especially minors in most cases) wishing to visit the website of the White House (www.whitehouse.gov) could easily go to the adult website instead. Although .gov, a top-level domain (TLD), is available only to official government sites in the United States, .com is a much more common TLD and is frequently entered by mistake. In addition, many web browsers add '.com' to the end of an address if no suffix is entered, so simply typing 'whitehouse' into the address bar would lead one to whitehouse.com. Because of the explicit and commercial content of the site, it was frequently cited as one of the most egregious examples of domain name misuse, up until the domain was sold.

Many school children in the late 1990s inadvertently saw adult content via the website.

The website whitehouse.org, a humor site that formerly satirized the former U.S. president George W. Bush, remains controversial for similar reasons, although less so because its content is usually much less explicit.

In 2006, PC World ranked Whitehouse.com #13 on its list "The 25 Worst Web Sites".

Opposition

In December 1997, the Clinton administration sent Dan Parisi a cease and desist letter stating, "... we do not challenge your right to pursue it or to exercise your First Amendment rights, but we do challenge your right to use the White House, the President, and the First Lady as a marketing device. For adult internet users, that device is, at the least, part of a deceptive scheme. For younger Internet users, it has more disturbing consequences." The letter had no effect and the site stayed up.

[Crucial]

Yes, I agree with you on all points. From my point of view, losing control of the Internet is an indispensable tool for keeping tyrants at bay, at least to some degree. I hope this hand wringing is much ado about nothing.