We got a phone number?
Common symptom of sociopaths. They hate criticism. They downright loathe ridicule.
All Donald has to do is mention the mothers of the fallen in Libya and how she pulled the whool over their eyes with the “video” mem.
Keep needling her by mentioning her dealings with those like the SS while she was in the White House as First Lady.
If the witch even so much as brings up that Trump doesn t have the demeanor to be POTUS, bring the above up.
Maybe once upon a time, but these days it is Weekend at Bernies for her staff.
I think Trump can be pretty good at throwing off balance someone like Hillary, without coming off as offensive.
The biggest vulnerability of most people is their self-image.
>>”When you criticize her, she goes nuts. She becomes very defensive and angry, damn near throws you out of the room,” Morris said. “So her staff learns not to cross her and they just do not subject her to the kind of criticism, and the kind of advice that normally candidates get.<<
At the risk of invoking Godwin’s Law, Hitler was known for the same thing. Sociopaths.
“The next day, Obama and Clinton were both at Reagan National Airport on their way to Iowa for a debate, and the candidates met on the tarmac for what became a brief but heated conversation. Then-Obama personal aide Reggie Love witnessed the event and describes it in his new memoir:
“I want to apologize for the whole Shaheen thing,” Clinton said. “I want you to know I had nothing to do with it.”
The candidate very respectfully told her the apology was kind, but largely meaningless, given the emails it was rumored her camp had been sending out labeling him as a Muslim. Before he could finish his sentence, she exploded on Obama. In a matter of seconds, she went from composed to furious. It had not been Obama’s intention to upset her, but he wasn’t going to play the fool either. To all of us watching the spat unfold, it was an obvious turning point in our campaign, and we knew it. Clinton was no less competitive or committed to a cause than Obama, and the electric tension running through both candidates and their respective staffs reflected the understanding that she was no longer the de facto Democratic candidate. Her inevitability had been questioned.…”
http://spectator.org/64130_obama-accused-hillary-labeling-him-muslim/
Hillary....who is Diane Reynolds that you were e-mailing?
Trump should have Paula Jones seated in the front row to rattle Hillary.
Dick Morris on Hillary: “Never once did she let me play with her toes”
An Examination of the Effectiveness of the Stooge-Style Eye-Poke as a Debating Device:
I always find it quite entertaining to encounter anti-gunners who are obviously on the edge. If you find yourself debating one it pays to have something on tap that could crack 'em like an egg.A few years back I ran into a local politico who loved to yammer on endlessly about "AK-47s which can kill our kids from hundreds of yards away." I kindly pointed out that due to the poorly-designed sights and crudely-crafted ammunition commonly available for those rifles, even a competent marksman (not to mention an addled crackhead) would find it hard to nail a target as small and fast-moving as the average grade-schooler would present at even, say, 75 yards.
The lady immediately dropped her fairly calm policy-wonk mask and launched into an extremely-detailed, marathon hissy about how all gun-owners are despicable monsters who should be locked up -- BaddaBing, the truth at last! While red and shaky by the end, she unfortunately did not end up popping a critical vessel. It was a great laugh all the same.
I actually picked up on this tactic from an old friend who used to be an occasional guest on local radio. During nasty debates over various and sundry, he'd wait until a commercial break, lean over to his opponent, and whisper something like, "So, your momma didn't breast-feed you enough, or what?" and then feign surprise when the bonehead started hyperventilating just as the engineer started the countdown for the next segment.
Many of the gun-banners are so maniacally certain that they are on the side of the angels that a simple, utterly childish eye-poke can occasionally completely unhinge them. The best way to employ this tool is "live", when you can pounce on the resulting momentary brain-lock and close in for the kill. It is less useful in print situations, where a response will more than likely be composed after the initial anger passes, but can still be handy for laying the groundwork for a future encounter. Pick out something that promises to tweak off your target, and include some reference to it in all of your relevant correspondence to the press. Then, when you eventually get the chance to square off against the weasel, you can drop in a tangential reference to your past insults which will sound completely innocent to anyone else, but should yield approximately the same result as a direct attack.
My question to the hag.
Does a law abiding citizen of the US, who lives in the inner city, have the right to own a gun? If not why not?
Trump has got this. He’s sat with high powered execs who make their living trying to squeeze concessions and money out of people using whatever tactics they possibly can. In essence Trump is walking into a board room KNOWING he’s got the best position and expecting that the entire room is going to be hostile and try to tear down that position. He’s been there, done that. Clinton has gotten deference and kowtowing all her life. That ends Monday night.
What? What? The Queen doesn’t like it when the little people don’t kiss her butt? I never would have guessed it...
DONALD TRUMP - BEWARE of EATING or DRINKING anything offered
to you at the DEBATES!!!
Bring your own refreshments AND WATCH THEM CLOSELY!!!
It’s narcissistic rage.