Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary, Gorelick, and the Corruption of the TWA 800 Case
The Americanc Thinker ^ | July 5, 2016 | Jack Cahill

Posted on 09/21/2016 9:36:03 PM PDT by Tours

As I was writing my new book on TWA Flight 800 --TWA 800: The Crash, The Cover-Up, The Conspiracy, now available wherever you buy books -- I wondered how Hillary Clinton’s success would affect the book’s.

On the up side, if Hillary were nominated, the book would be more relevant as she was at the quiet center of the action. On the down side, her nomination would increase the odds that a protective major media would continue to ignore the great untold story of our time.

The media run the risk of being the only adults who do not know this story. It began at 8:19 p.m. on July 17, 1996, when TWA Flight 800 left JFK Airport in New York bound for Paris. At 8:31 p.m., the 747 exploded off the coast of Long Island, killing all 230 people on board.....

Needing someone to work through, they finally found a fixer worthy of the number two position, a little-known DC litigator named Jamie Gorelick. With Gorelick’s appointment as deputy attorney general in February 1994, Hillary had three women occupying the most powerful posts in federal law enforcement, criminal division head Jo Ann Harris being the third.....

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 911commission; caproni; fanniemae; fbi; gorelick; hillaryclington; jamiegorelick; janetreno; twa800; valeriecaproni
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2016 9:36:04 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tours

It the darkest recesses of Washington certain women seem to be able to do anything and never be held accountable.

Hillary Clinton, Jamie Gorelick, Victoria Nuland and Lois Lerner for starters.....


2 posted on 09/21/2016 9:38:04 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Bill Clinton, near the end of the campaign, could not have it known that a shoulder fired missile took down an airliner.

The first report I heard was on CBS when they said that the Pentagon is reporting the crash of an airliner. That is the only time I heard the Pentagon mention it. Why would the Pentagon be reporting a civilian airline crash off the East Coast?


3 posted on 09/21/2016 9:49:59 PM PDT by doug from upland (She is evil, corrupt, and brain damaged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

And...why would the CIA have produced that ridiculous animation....

In Washington speak, Gorelick is known as a “fixer”.


4 posted on 09/21/2016 9:58:40 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Flight 800 was at 13,700 ft when it exploded. The MANPAD with the highest range is the Stinger which reaches an altitude of 10,000 ft.


5 posted on 09/21/2016 10:23:38 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

FIM-92 Stinger (1996 version) has a range of 26,000 feet


6 posted on 09/21/2016 10:39:31 PM PDT by doug from upland (She is evil, corrupt, and brain damaged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
a range of 26,000 feet

That is its range, not the altitude it will reach. I was confused about that point, too. I researched MANPADs for a book I am working on.

A Stinger might theoretically reach 13,700 ft, but probably not.

7 posted on 09/21/2016 10:52:17 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

The book is a thriller. I wanted the bad guy to bring down a plane with a Stinger, but the plane would most likely be flying at 30,000 ft at that location. Even though the point from which the Stinger was launched is 4,000 ft, I decided to give the pilot a good reason to be flying low in order to be credible.


8 posted on 09/21/2016 10:55:21 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

OK. At the time I remember someone talking about a two stage missile with an increased range.


9 posted on 09/21/2016 11:17:48 PM PDT by doug from upland (She is evil, corrupt, and brain damaged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Jeff Chandler

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3437887/posts?page=100#100

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3437887/posts?page=153#153

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3437887/posts?page=170#170


10 posted on 09/21/2016 11:23:27 PM PDT by Pelham (DLM. Deplorable Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I'm not aware of any two stage shoulder mounted missiles. If the authorities lied about Flight 800's altitude, then a MANPAD would make sense.

It would be interesting to look at the location of the explosion and compare it with the altitudes of similar airlines taking off from JFK.

11 posted on 09/21/2016 11:29:29 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

The U.S. Navy was undergoing pyrotechnic maneuvers on off the coast of New Jersey that evening. This was reported in the immediate hours after the explosion, and then removed and never mentioned again.

Coincidence?


12 posted on 09/21/2016 11:38:04 PM PDT by Gigantor (Either the United States respects its Constitution, or there is no need for a United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Thanks. Great info.


13 posted on 09/22/2016 12:15:51 AM PDT by doug from upland (She is evil, corrupt, and brain damaged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Pierre Salinger immediately said that his informants stated that it was the US Navy.


14 posted on 09/22/2016 12:41:53 AM PDT by suekas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tours
Read Cahill’s book on TWA 800. There is no question a missile of some type took down the aircraft. Many credible witnesses described seeing a contrail of sorts ascending from the horizon in a reverse Nike swoosh pattern and then the explosion. The center fuel tank explosion theory is pure BS.
The FBI head investigator Kalstrom is well aware of the truth.
15 posted on 09/22/2016 1:08:57 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Read Cahill’s book on TWA 800.

Header spells it Cahill ... it's Cashill. As in Jack Cashill.

16 posted on 09/22/2016 1:34:18 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gigantor

Yes, the Navy story was told right after the event by those involved. Back then, I was so used to the Clintonian tactic of making bad news disappear that I assumed the coverup was just to avoid involving his Presidency (and Hellary’s future goals) from being tarnished. Whatever happened to Louie Freeh? Wasn’t he complicit in their many cover ups?


17 posted on 09/22/2016 1:36:52 AM PDT by The Westerner (Will Free Republic exist when ICANN controls the web?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Flight 800 was at 13,700 ft when it exploded. The MANPAD with the highest range is the Stinger which reaches an altitude of 10,000 ft.

...

There was a no conspiracy, but even the NTSB said a high end portable missile could have reached TWA800 from a relatively small radius underneath the flight path.


18 posted on 09/22/2016 1:46:19 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Many credible witnesses described seeing a contrail of sorts ascending from the horizon in a reverse Nike swoosh pattern and then the explosion.

Perhaps the best witness, the captain of the Eastwinds 737, was positive he did not see a missile.

The center fuel tank explosion theory is pure BS.

It's the most probable cause. Many times more probable than a missile.

19 posted on 09/22/2016 1:51:54 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Valerie Jarrett, Kathleen Sebelius.


20 posted on 09/22/2016 5:16:13 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson