[tatown]

I still can’t wrap my head around the fact that she isn’t down by double digits. She is easily the worst candidate in modern history.

[NYC-RepublicanCT]

$145 million of ads, plus constant 24x7 media bias can prop up a ham sandwich.

[eekitsagreek]

I still can’t wrap my head around the fact that she isn’t down by double digits. She is easily the worst candidate in modern history.

There are people who will always vote Democrat no matter how bad the candidate. There are people that also want their free stuff.

[freedomlover]

I still can’t wrap my head around the fact that she isn’t down by double digits. She is easily the worst candidate in modern history.

---

For the taking class, all that matters is who will take from others and give to you.

[LS]

The fact is, she may well be. We have many polls where she is at 39%, state and national. They don’t correspondingly show Trump up that much because of the “reluctant Trump” people (”reluctant” to publicly name him) and/or undecideds who will break his way in very large numbers.

So, it could in fact end up being about a double digit lead for Trump.

[randita]

As disliked as Clinton is, I factor in that Trump is also disliked.

Most of my family and associates are Republicans and I only know one person among them who is enthusiastic about Trump. Most of them say they’ll vote for Trump primarily because he’s not Clinton. A few are considering writing in someone or not voting for either.

Hopefully your experiences are different, but I’m just calling it as I see it from my of the woods (FYI a precinct who voted 67% for Romney).