that increases costs. also having employees leave for long periods of time is inherently costly.
6 weeks after having a baby? I suspect most companies pay for that now. My employer already did and if not, I don’t think six weeks after having a baby getting unemployment type insurance is a terrible thing.
Anyway, he’s working on it to get the woman vote, primarily young women, he has to have it. Also why he had Ivanka introduce the program.
He has to win, if he loses - we get Hillary.
Suck it up buttercup.
Perhaps it may increase costs. Many large companies already provide this. Then there is FMLA, no pay, but job protection.
I worked for a large Corp when pregnant. They offered 6 weeks related. I had to take a week off before birth, so I had 5 weeks at home. Thank goodness for Mom watching my baby then even after school. . I don’t know how women can work all day after leaving their child in a day care. I would not have been able to concentrate.