[Ancesthntr]

This woman is an out-of-control menace to not just this nation, but to the world. Every single thing she accuses Donald Trump of doing or being - reckless, ill-informed, "temperamentally-unsuited" to be the President, etc., etc. - applies to her. More important than my thoughts on the matter are those of the Russian leadership. They are, according to this article, EXTREMELY worried that Clinton may become President and start a war.

IMHO, forget EVERY SINGLE OTHER ISSUE - a war with Russia because of Hillary Clinton's arrogance, lack of information, lack of good judgment and explosive temper MUST be avoided. She utterly failed with the so-called "Reset Button" in improving relations with Russia, and her being given ultimate foreign and defense policy power would be a disaster of Biblical proportions.

[vooch]

agreed - Hillary is a crazed bloodthirsty war monger

[Boogieman]

“Clinton had not merely insulted Russia’s president: She had done so in his own words.”

Well, they’re both communists and communists all use the same calculated terminology.

[BenLurkin]

I’m not sure nationalism can be extreme. You either favor your nation over all others, or you are a globalist.

[roadcat]

To Russians, it appeared that Clinton was straining to fabricate a rationale for hostilities.

Hillary Clinton is a war-monger. Words have consequences. She is reckless in speaking off the cuff about foreign leaders, particularly important ones like Putin. She could learn a thing or two from Donald Trump about treating foreign leaders like Putin with some respect. Hillary flying off the handle will drag us into a world war. (And she is a hypocrite.)

[BitWielder1]

Hillary's formative years were during the Cold War, maybe she wants to wrap herself in something familiar and comfy, rather than the Islamic threat that she can't seem to comprehend at all.

[txrefugee]

There is a body of experience that should give us pause about having a woman president. Often when female police officers feel threatened, they resort to shooting a suspect instead of using other means of subduing them, as male officers do. Perhaps they know their physical shortcomings or they do not want to appear weak, so they use deadly force when it isn’t always necessary.

[rockinqsranch]

Agree with your post.

[Little Ray]

I can’t believe anyone is stupid enough to start a war with Russia.
Not even Hillary!.
We’re broke, our military is over-extended and worn out, and it goes against the first rule “Never get involved in a land war in Asia.”

[timestax]

ping

[Little Pig]

So, given that the Russians already view Hillary as a threat, and probably have less than favorable opinions about the US Democrat party in general thanks to the Feckless Obama, how are they taking all of the Dem-promulgated hints and insinuations that they (Russia) are busy hacking their way into the US election mechanisms to try to push “their” candidate (Trump)? If the Dems decide to keep pushing that meme, they may well go all the way after the election:

If Trump wins, the Dems cry foul and claim Russia was behind it. They try to have election results thrown out, maybe have some doctored ballots made up as “evidence” to solidify the accusation. With DHS already leaning into the election sphere, does the US take action against Russia?

If Hillary wins, do they still drag out some doctored election results, but claim that they caught those evil Russkies before they could Ruin Everything, and then go ahead and light Russia up anyway, both to solidify their position and to provide a ready distraction and excuse to impose further Leftist-utopian controls on the US?

[Iron Munro]

It sure does look like the democrats are trying to fire up another shooting war.

But why?

[Ohioan]

Hillary Clinton is not only a long proven liar--at least since the early 1970s. She is a demonstrable "crack pot," since her late teens. The idea that she might provoke a preemptive strike is certainly chilling; but the most chilling aspect of it, will still remain her implied suggestion, that there is something extreme, or even questionable, about patriotic citizens of any nation, putting their own nation first.

The idea of this lying crack pot, endangering the world, because of her despicable intolerance for people who love their own nations--that is people who understand that it is the normal thing for parents to try to provide a safe and secure future for their "posterity," which is indeed the stated purpose in so many words of our written Constitution--see "Who We Are!"--is indeed sobering to say the least.

[DesertRhino]

Hell I believe it too. She is flat out evil, and is under the spell of our wacked out Generals and intel types, who by all appearances, have decided they can fight a limited conventional war with Russia to back them down and put them in their place. Which is following the world plan of NATO and the US NWO.

[Truth29]

Hillary will authorize a direct attack on Syria and Assad because she is determined to overthrow the Syrian regime no matter the cost. She will have American forces fire on the Russians and then, if Vlad stands his ground, there will be war.

[Always A Marine]

I agree that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger, as are more than a few of her fellow-travelling Globalists who hide in the Republican Party. What unites the Globalists against Donald Trump is that Trump is a nationalist who opposes their vision of a borderless world. I was mistaken to have supported Ted Cruz despite his pro-TPP and squishy border positions, and am thankful that Trump won the nomination.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Don’t forget: If it wasn’t for the media, she would be in jail right now and nowhere near running for President. Try to imagine if they treated the Clintons the way they treated Nixon. If this woman wins this election, every American citizen who loves this country should absolutely boycott the ENTIRE media establishment. Half this country leans right, that’s 160 million people. No more CBS, NBC, ABC even Fox news who have been attacking Trump regularly now on orders of Rupert Murdoch. Do not watch their TV shows, do not visit their websites, think of every possibly way they make money and completely eliminate it from your life.

[ETL]

It was the Soros-supported demonRats that appeased Putin on such critical things as missile defense and the NewSTART nuke deal, as well as the Iran nuke deal.

Aug 2015

___________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html

[realcleanguy]

Good Article, and yes it appears Hillary is laying the groundwork to declare war on Russia and do to Russia what she helped do in Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Syria. War is what she wants. Destroying the nations and the world is her goal. She is a danger to all mankind

[Mamzelle]

Since Putin could remove Soros at any time, I doubt the reasoning here.

[exDemMom]

Well, look at the way Hillary destabilized the entire Middle East, all because she apparently had a grudge against Muammar Khaddafi (for what reason, we will probably never know).

The way she is talking about Putin and Russia, we have reason to be concerned. Her finger will be on the nuclear button, and she is notoriously unstable. Could she decide to take drastic action against Moscow, for her own twisted reasons?

Russia is no longer the belligerent of the Soviet Union. We have every reason in the world to continue dialog with them in a civilized manner. Trump is the person to keep that dialog going.