Obama viewed NATO as a ‘threat’ rather than peace alliance, top U.S. general charges

Washington Times ^ | 9/9/16 | Rowan Scarborough

[Nachum]

A threat to whom...?

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[Robert DeLong]

Non NATO nations I guess. Like it says he viewed it as a warmonger entity rather than a defensive entity.

[Enchante]

Oh but it’s Donald Trump who is a problem for our relations with NATO, coz Shrillary told us so!

[Doogle]

....daz mostly white, dats why

[BenLurkin]

America’s enemies.

Remember, John Kerry supported America’s enemies in the 1970s, and John Kerry supported America’s enemies in the 1980s. John Kerry was appointed to SOS by Hussein.

[Enchante]

Obozo, Shrillary, and Kerry have screwed up every part of the world..... yet Shrillary boasts that she was the Savior for US foreign policy and the MSM never challenges her on it.

[Red Badger]

The left hates the military. PERIOD................

[the_Watchman]

Trump should be asking Hillary: “How’s that Arab Spring thing working out for you?!” She was right in the middle of that mess.

[ColdOne]

anything that was around before he got in power is part of the evil whitey theme.

[1rudeboy]

Pretty much the way the Russians think about it. Go figure.

[ETL]

A threat to whom...?

To his secret buddy Putin and Co? He's already shown how "flexible" he could be with him on nukes and missile defense, as well as the Iran deal. The two are in cahoots, despite the public smoke screen.

__________________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html

[DesertRhino]

That jackass Breedlove wanted NATO to go to war with Russia, over a non-nato member, on behalf of a coup trying to consolidate power.

[Robert DeLong]

Probably the majority of Muslim countries as well, which may be the bigger reason he has a problem with NATO. My only problem with NATO is that America is picking up more than her fair share, and more like the lion's share.

But the real problem in the world is the U.N. It's a total waste of resources.

[butlerweave]

well Obama has never been on the Right Side

[TigersEye]

0bama didn’t have a problem with NATO when he wanted to use them for his illegal war on Libya.

[Reverend Wright]

A threat to whom...?

Obama probably sees NATO as a threat to Islam.

[ETL]

Well, Obama has never been on the Right Side

[Secret Agent Man]

Threat to his muslim brothers. I get it.

Nice to be confirmed in things I/we knew since before the election.

[ETL]

The left hates the military. PERIOD....

Correction: the left hates the [United States] military. They have zero problems with the military of leftist regimes. They've yet to find a bloody leftist uprising or revolution that they didn't embrace and support. Their kind worship mass murderers like Mao tse Tung. They love Castro's military dictatorship, on and on.