Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From FBI fragments, a question: Did Team Clinton destroy evidence under subpoena?From FBI fragments,
The Washington Examiner ^ | September 3, 2016 | Byron York

Posted on 09/04/2016 6:51:49 PM PDT by Hojczyk

The incomplete records of the Hillary Clinton email investigation released by the FBI raise questions about the conduct not only of Clinton but of her top aides and the staffers working under their direction. Perhaps the most serious is whether the Clinton team destroyed evidence which they were under legal order to save and produce to congressional investigators.

Out of a massive investigation, the FBI has released just two documents: a heavily-redacted version of its summary report and a writeup — the so-called 302 — from agents' July 2 interview with Clinton. The rest, including reports from interviews with other players, remains secret, although the FBI has shared it with Congress, with redactions and under tight viewing restrictions.

Shortly after the two documents were released on the Friday afternoon before Labor Day, Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, sent out a statement suggesting he does not believe the documents tell the full story, and that if the full story were told it might suggest wrongdoing on the part of the Clinton team.

"The FBI selectively releasing Secretary Clinton's interview summary is of little benefit to the public unless and until all relevant documents and witness interview summaries are released," Gowdy said. "The public is entitled to all relative information, including the testimony of the witnesses at Platte River Networks, the entity which maintained the private server. The public will find the timeline and witness responses and failures to respond instructive."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alqaedarico; benghazirico; clinton; clintonrico; comeyrico; coverup; crookedfbi; emails; fbi; fbicorruption; fbihillarydocs; fbirico; foia; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hsbcrico; lynchrico; obamarico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Hojczyk

DUH!!!


61 posted on 09/05/2016 3:19:15 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk; FReepers; Patriots; FRiends




REPORT: CNN EXECS DEMANDED DR. DREW RETRACT HILLARY HEALTH COMMENTS...


Now LESS than $2.4k to GO!!!
PLEASE MAKE YOUR DONATION!

62 posted on 09/05/2016 3:21:41 AM PDT by onyx (YOU'RE POSTING HERE, SO DONATE MONTHLY! NOT NICE TO FREEPLOAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

WHY would there be Redactions and Tight Viewing Restrictions IF there were NO STATE SECRETS in these E-MAILS???? And WHY doesn’t Jason Chaffetz have the Clearance to see these?


63 posted on 09/05/2016 3:22:09 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batterycommander

Lynch was already CORRUPT...it’s why Obama HIRED her!!


64 posted on 09/05/2016 3:26:49 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Trey Gowdy SHPOULD have resigned and made a HUGE STINK about the CORRUPTION in the FBI and the “JUST US” Dept!! COWARD!!! Comey is as corrupt as Lynch.....EXPOSE THEM!!


65 posted on 09/05/2016 3:28:52 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

dear ucan,

There are those, like me, that may have a ‘smartphone’, but do not use them for ‘emails’ (that’s why we have home computers), so when you start mentioning ‘smartphone email methods’, it’s speaking Greek, not Geek.

Just an ‘fyi’.


66 posted on 09/05/2016 3:43:11 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

dear ptsal,

I do not thank that portion of things has not been reported.


67 posted on 09/05/2016 3:44:21 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Does a fat dog fart?


68 posted on 09/05/2016 4:20:47 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
“I can almost hear Trey Gowdy asking Mrs. Clinton, under oath, “So when you assumed a [C] meant.........

Exactly what I was saying to myself when I heard this info. And of course it should have been the very same question the FBI should have asked Canklebeast as well. Yet it appears it never happened, it almost like the someone told these Agents not to veer from script. Kind of like someone didn't want to get to the bottom of anything....cough cough

69 posted on 09/05/2016 6:57:43 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
...raise questions about the conduct not only of Clinton but of her top aides and the staffers working under their direction...

This is a multi-player series of events. Dozens and dozens of people are involved. And no one is mentioning wire fraud. If there ever was a case for RICO, this is it.

70 posted on 09/05/2016 7:39:56 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Enforce the Law. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

There is ample evidence for charging Hillary with obstructing justice and lying to federal investigators. The DOJ was bought off by the Clinton’s


71 posted on 09/05/2016 7:53:50 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
What were in those emails she and her staff were so desperate to destroy?

The purpose of the private email server was to hide from review the pay for play correspondence for the Clinton Charity scam.

You can also bet there was correspondence which showed America's FIRST Muslim President as he was directing aid to terrorist organizations in Libya, Egypt and Syria. As a Muslim. one of Hussein's initiatives to hurt the US is to flood the country with Muslims. The Muslims cannot defeat the US on the battlefield, their only hope is to infiltrate the US at every level.

Most Americans wait for the presstitutes to tell them wha to think. With Hussein's propaganda office controlling the presstitutes, CBS, ABC, MSNBC.... will be singing praise for Obama even when Sharia Law is declared the official law in the US.

72 posted on 09/05/2016 5:18:34 PM PDT by politicianslie (What would a terroristdo if he were made POTUS? ANS: Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
There are those, like me, that may have a ‘smartphone’, but do not use them for ‘emails’ (that’s why we have home computers), so when you start mentioning ‘smartphone email methods’, it’s speaking Greek, not Geek.

Hmmm.... I don't remember saying "smartphone email methods". What I was referring to was use of a smartphone to access things like Facebook and Twitter and Free Republic. I have been out and about all weekend and I see everyone using their smartphone. Just because you don't use it that way doesn't mean others don't. Correct ?

Did you see the video of Hillary coughing her butt off at the 'press conference ?

73 posted on 09/05/2016 9:01:51 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
I am having my original response (post 73) removed. I was responding to several different threads at the same time, and got mixed up. So, if you see post 73 before it's removed, ignore it.

Now, to fix that...

There are those, like me, that may have a ‘smartphone’, but do not use them for ‘emails’ (that’s why we have home computers), so when you start mentioning ‘smartphone email methods’, it’s speaking Greek, not Geek.

Thank you for asking for more details.

The technique is the same for smartphones and home computers. ( These particular Blackberries that Hillary was using were 'special government ones, which is why she had to keep asking for 'replacements'. The scam required multiple smartphones with the same phone number.)

For instance, one your home PC, create an EMAIL, but instead of SENDING IT, save it as a DRAFT.

Now, you can log off your computer and go to the library or your neighbor's house , anywhere you can find another PC (home computer) and LOGIN to your EMAIL ACCOUNT. You will find your DRAFT EMAIL message there.

Now, instead of you going to another PC, imagine you want to communicate with the person who has that other HOME COMPUTER. You just give them your EMAIL LOGIN and they can see your DRAFT email. But... you never 'sent' it. There is no official record of it being 'sent' or 'received'. See how it works ?

Hillary was using these Blackberries the same way. That is why they weren't 'lost', they were just handed out to those she wanted to communicate with, but wanted no record. That is why these 'lost' phones were bashed with hammers before being returned. Hillary's staff thought that would keep anyone from finding those 'drafts'.

74 posted on 09/05/2016 9:50:10 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Dear ucann,

AHAH! ‘I think I’ve got it! I think I’ve got it! The Rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain!’

Draft, yessssss!

Now, that brings another unquestioned question ....

CAN THESE BOZOS BE BROUGH UP ON CHARGES OF DESTROYING GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?????


75 posted on 09/06/2016 1:55:16 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Dear Ucann,

Yes, i saw the new coughiing fit, ON THE PLANE, and then saying ‘it was allergies’.

Sure, others use their smartphones for all sorts of things. I do not do social media, and consider FR a non-social media, but a newsite capable of commentary, like newspapers online used to be, before they started censoring through facebook.

The last ‘social media’ I did use, was AOL. (don’t ask)

All this facebook (see my latest restaurant dish), myspace (same), pinterest (buy this), and the rest are for the millenials, not me.


76 posted on 09/06/2016 2:01:15 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
CAN THESE BOZOS BE BROUGH UP ON CHARGES OF DESTROYING GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?????

They could, if a prosecutor decided to bring up charges. But, we've already seen that they won't.

77 posted on 09/08/2016 8:03:35 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson