Posted on 09/01/2016 10:26:59 AM PDT by Weeble
Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them?
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Wolfowitz and the lies that he told in the high government positions that he held are responsible for a massive number of deaths and massive destruction in seven countries. Wolfowitz has announced his vote for Hillary Clinton. Does this make you feel reassured?
The real surprise would have been Wolfowitzs announcement in favor of Donald Trump. So why was what was expected news?
Trump has said that he doesnt see any future in the conflict Washington has initiated with Russia, and Trump questions the point of NATOs continuing existence. These peaceful attitudes make Trump into a national security risk according to Wolfowitz. What Wolfowitz means is that a peace candidate is a threat to Wolfowitzs doctrine of US world hegemony. In the crazed mind of Wolfowitz and the neoconservatives, America is not safe unless it rules the world.
Hillary is a warmonger, perhaps the ultimate and last one if she becomes president, as the combination of her hubris and incompetence is likely to result in World War 3. On July 3, 2015, Hillary declared: I want the Iranians to know that if Im president, we will attack Iran. . . . we would be able to totally obliterate them. http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484?print=1 The crazed Hillary went on from this to declare the President of Russia to be the new Hitler. Little doubt she thinks she can obliterate Russia also.
Hillary is the one who brought zionist neocon Victoria Nuland into the State Department to oversee the US coup in Ukraine in order to create more propaganda against Russia and force Washingtons European vassals to impose sanctions and place military bases on Russias borders, thus provoking a nuclear power and raising dangerous tensions.
This fits in perfectly with Wolfowitzs intention. As Wolfowitz is Hillarys likely Secretary of Defense, the two together mean World War 3.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, Wolfowitz, then a high Pentagon official, penned the Wolfowitz doctrine. The doctrine states that the principal goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of other countries that could serve as constraints on US unilateralism. This means Russia and China, The combination of Hillary with Wolfowitz should scare everyone in the entire world. The prospect of nuclear weapons being in such crazed hands as those of Hillary and Wolfowitz is the most alarming though imaginable.
The question is whether Hillary can be elected in the face of her violations of national security rules, for which she received a pass from corrupt Obama, and her heavily documented self-dealings that have produced a Clinton private fortune of $120 million and $1,600 million in their foundation. It is completely clear that the Clintons use public office for their private aggrandizement. Is this what Americans want? Two people who become even more rich as the world is led into nuclear war?
But with electronic voting machines, the question will not be decided by what Amerians want, but by how the electronic machines are programmed to report the vote. The US has already had elections in which the exit polls, always a reliable indicator of the winner prior to the appearance of electronic voting machines, indicated a different winner than the electronic voting machines produced. The secrecy of how the voting machines are programmed is protected by proprietary software. The machines have no paper trails, precluding vote recounts.
As both political establishments are fiercely opposed to Trump, how do you think the machines will be programmed? Indeed, the media is so opposed to Trump, the question is whether there will be exit polls and if there are, will they be misreported?
Republican operatives, not Republican voters, are all in a huff over their allegations that Trump is costing the Republicans votes. How can this be when Republican voters chose Trump over other candidates? Arent the Republican operatives saying that they, instead of the voters, should choose the Republican candidate?
If so, they are just like the Democrats. Some years ago the Democrat establishment created super delegates who are not chosen by voters. Enough super delegates were created in order to give the Party establishment the ability to over-ride the voters choice of presidential candidate. That it was the Democratsallegedly the party of the peoplewho first took the choice away from the people is astonishing. Much information indicates that Bernie Sanders actually won the Democratic presidential nomination but was denied it by vote fraud and super delegates.
This is politics in Americatotally corrupt. Chris Hedges might be right: nothing can change without revolution.
The demonization of Trump by the presstitutes is proof that Trump, despite his wealth, is regarded by the Oligarchs who comprise the One Percent as a threat to their agendas. The Oligarchs, not Trump, own or control the media. So the presstitute demonization of Trump is complete proof that he is the candidate to elect. The oligarchs who oppress us hate Trump, so the oppressed American people should support Trump.
The presstitute demonization of Trump did not work in the Republican primaries. Is it working in the presidential election? We dont know, because the polls are reported by the presstitutes, not by Trump.
If the demonization does not work, and the election has to be stolen from Trump by the electronic machines, the consequence will be to radicalize Americans, something long overdue. Perhaps the expectation of this development is the reason all federal agencies, even the post office and Social Security, have acquired arms and ammunition, and Cheneys firm Halliburton was paid $385,000,000 to build detention centers in the US.
Those who control us are not going to give up their control without a world war. In the United States evil has seized power from the people, and evil will not give it back.
nope
Quite possibly not. I thoroughly agree on Wolfowitz. He is a ghoul of unimaginable proportions and responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, massive destruction, and if anyone thinks it’s over, they’re delusional, as delusional as he himself was when he created his policy.
The takeover of elections by Homeland Security is not an acceptable development. It just is not. I hope Landmark Legal can produce a restraining order, but this will be the total destruction of trust in the government, a proven lie and corruption factory. I don’t know how to stop it, but I am certain it cannot be allowed to happen.
“I’ll believe it’s a crisis when people who
tell me it’s a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis.”
==== Instapundit
Thomas Jefferson outlined the procedure rather nicely.
‘Landmark Legal’, as in Mark Levin’s law firm? Mark is now persona non grata here at FR ...
Those who control us are not going to give up their control without a world war. In the United States evil has seized power from the people, and evil will not give it back.
******************************************************
Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009
That’s when I knew this was true
No he’s not. JimRob just posted an piece yesterday reminding us that Levin has long been a friend of this site, is a member here, and even though we think he is misguided, we pray for him to wake up and see the light. So I wouldn’t go too far in attacking him.
The military-industrial industry thrives on perpetual half-measure wars.
We wind up with unsettled conflicts all around the globe. They require perpetual spending, in the industrial-military complex.
Korea, Iraq. Mideast. Cold War. Turkey inside NATO. Weapons to nations which turn against our interests. Etc..
Like politicians, retired generals live like millionaires.
Six figure military pensions, plus six figure lobbyist jobs.
Trump threatens their paradigm. He is too unpredictable.
That’s not Jim’s take on it.
Levin needs a good talking to, and who better than us?
I would say they will not give it back willingly or easily. They’re not God. They are too stupid and incompetent to be God. They put on their pants one leg at a time.
I was watching a doc on Himmler on Netflix, reading from his letters, and he started saying that the trouble with the homosexual is when he gets into a hiring position he doesn’t hire on talent, intellect, or experience. He hires another ‘homozekzual,’ (they recognize each other from across a room - gaydar). There is no way to build a world class organization on that basis. I really couldn’t argue with that. Then he said therefore, all homosexuals are to be arrested and imprisoned in concentration camps and if they try to escape, shot on sight. Kinda lost me there, Heinie.
Thank you for posting this article.
I read it yesterday or the day before at Lew Rockwell’s site, but that is a site that is not welcome here. Then I saw it at another site, OpEd, and started a thread, and it was rejected because that site was not welcome here either.
I didn’t know Paul Craig Roberts had his own webpage. That’s wonderful, because it was frustrating not to be able to share his excellent article here. He was President Reagan’s Asst. Secretary of the Treasure, and his writing is worth reading.
An interesting note for consideration is this:
Some people smear and demean libertarians. While some criticism may be partially justified, it may well be short-sighted. Why? Because, in continuing to read Lew Rockwell’s site of interesting articles authored by a smattering of different authors, I have noticed an important point, which would otherwise have been missed.
The point is this: MANY libertarians have moved CLOSER to the positions of many on Free Republic. MANY libertarians support Donald Trump.
Not to take advantage of acknowledging support from otherwise non-supporting groups is unwise and costly. It is much preferable to welcome support in the name of UNITY.
DJT welcomes Bernie supporters. I welcome the support of libertarians.
It might be beneficial to our cause to review the “not welcome” stance on several of these websites.
Look for force to have ro end evil. It has no choice.
Unity is what is going to be needed more than ever.
Self-ping.
But the realiry is that to go third party is simply a vote for Hillary. Trump is it.
To some.
Landmark Legal engages in many complex legal battles well under the radar screen and has been responsible for several successful lawsuits against, for one example, the EPA in which they EPA was held in contempt (not that anything happened as a result, other than LL having their legal fees paid.)
I can’t think of too many other loci of legal clout who could mount a credible attack against Homeland Security taking over the election, a possibility that should alarm anyone other than the most partisan communist Democrat imaginable. You understand, that should DHS become somehow mandated or empowered to take over the election, it could be construed as sedition to challenge them in any way. Completely forgetting that it is black letter sedition for them to take it over in the first place.
Capital L Libertarians have become just lazy Democrat dopers. Presumably, actual libertarian ideas will make a comeback some day.
corruption factory
***************
A very good and accurate description.
There’s an ocean of money in the government and those in power want it to flow their way.
As I see it, the US government has largely become a Hillary Clinton hero-worship enterprise, with the vast majority of the individuals employed and ensconced therein simply in awe of the astonishing levels of total corruption and vast personal enrichment she and Bill have managed to secure for themselves over their careers. She is the Michael Jordan, the Serena Williams of insider corruption. Except obviously, Michael Jordan did not seek to destroy basketball nor did Williams seek to destroy tennis via the exhibition of their amazing talents. This is the paradigm HRC has established and let’s face it, out-grifted perhaps anyone in US history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.