[Attention Surplus Disorder]

To some.

Landmark Legal engages in many complex legal battles well under the radar screen and has been responsible for several successful lawsuits against, for one example, the EPA in which they EPA was held in contempt (not that anything happened as a result, other than LL having their legal fees paid.)

I can’t think of too many other loci of legal clout who could mount a credible attack against Homeland Security taking over the election, a possibility that should alarm anyone other than the most partisan communist Democrat imaginable. You understand, that should DHS become somehow mandated or empowered to take over the election, it could be construed as sedition to challenge them in any way. Completely forgetting that it is black letter sedition for them to take it over in the first place.

[Right-wing Librarian]

>>should DHS become somehow mandated or empowered to take over the election, it could be construed as sedition to challenge them in any way. Completely forgetting that it is black letter sedition for them to take it over in the first place.
*************************************************************
Exactly. I don’t understand why there isn’t furor over this point, except the recognition that we already live under Tyranny and fear the gov’t, which in and of itself, is the stunning reality about which many have yet to clearly understand.

[itsahoot]

I can’t think of too many other loci of legal clout who could mount a credible attack against Homeland Security taking over the election,

There will be zero time to go to court because it will all happen at the last minute.

Even scarier is the other idea they floated in case one of the candidates died they could postpone the election.