Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/24/2016 10:47:35 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

The NYT’s should be forced to register as a communist DNC political organization.


2 posted on 08/24/2016 10:52:13 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Clearly getting her elected means more to them than their own history or reputation.


3 posted on 08/24/2016 10:55:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Trump needs to mention the Foundation in EVERY speech he makes from now to September.

The amount of evil it has done almost defies belief.


4 posted on 08/24/2016 10:56:08 AM PDT by WashingtonFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Look on the bright side.  The New York Times is just practicing for the time a couple of years from now, when they aren't printing anything anymore.


Ramirez's latest political cartoon LARGE VERSION
08/21/2016: LINK  LINK to regular sized version of Ramirez's latest, and an archive of his political cartoons.

In this political cartoon, Ramirez presents, "Obama's Disaster"


If you're not on the automated monthly donation program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  
LINK



FReepers, 60.38% of the Third Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Please click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

5 posted on 08/24/2016 10:57:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Best use for NY Times:


6 posted on 08/24/2016 10:59:31 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“But the frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton.”

Gee... and why would that be?


7 posted on 08/24/2016 11:03:46 AM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
“The meetings between the Democratic presidential nominee and foundation donors do not appear to violate legal agreements Clinton and former president Bill Clinton signed before she joined the State Department in 2009,” the AP wrote.

$156 million in contributions from private individuals with business pending before a federal agency does not violate conflict of interest laws? I would think, at a minimum, that HRC should have recused herself from any dealings with any Clinton Foundation donors, including those from foreign governments as well as the private sector.

I suppose violations of longstanding conflict of interest laws -- which apply to everyone except, apparently HRC -- might be a separate matter from violations of the additional legal agreements HRC and WJC signed before she joined the State Department. But it's hard to believe she didn't violate the latter as well, unless the agreements were crafted from Swiss cheese with most of the cheese trimmed away.

The standard apparently in play here is that nothing will be deemed a violation unless Hillary personally wrote an email saying, "Thank you for your donation of $2 million to the Foundation in return for X,Y and Z. I will see that the USG delivers on our half of the deal immediately. Please keep this confidential because we want to maintain plausible deniabilty in the event that DOJ is unable to squelch any pesky investigators."

Since Hillary probably did not write any such email (such assurances would have been verbal), neither Obama administration sleuths nor the MSM will detect any wrongdoing.

8 posted on 08/24/2016 11:04:26 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Clinton Foundation scandal will not be a deterrent to not vote for Clinton. Those who voted for Obama during the last election will vote for him for a third term(i.e.Hillary)


9 posted on 08/24/2016 11:06:11 AM PDT by 353FMG (AMERICA MATTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And as NYT goes so goes hundreds of other newspapers who worship the NYT.


13 posted on 08/24/2016 11:22:48 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

One would have been questionable. Two would have been alarming. Ten would have been scandalous. Eighty-five is intolerable! (to normal people but not the MFM).


15 posted on 08/24/2016 11:34:02 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

NYT is very nervous because they are getting hacked by the “Russian hackers.” I am looking forward to seeing the emails regarding how they are instructed what to write by the DNC.


16 posted on 08/24/2016 11:36:36 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
 photo 0b60bf5f-4b1d-47e0-a572-978ecd55a54d_zpsie3jld9s.jpg
18 posted on 08/24/2016 11:38:32 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yep, Bias is what you print and how, and what you don’t print and why.

I couldn’t help but notice Norduh O’Donnell on CBS “This Morning” squirm in her chair as the liberal guest talked about the CLinton problems.


20 posted on 08/24/2016 11:44:05 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hillary is clearly getting her moneys worth with major media avoiding the potholes for her however she’s still going to hit a brick wall! Her lies are sinking her ship fast!


23 posted on 08/24/2016 11:55:51 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Can’t wait until wikileaks dumps email conversations between the white house and NYT execs and editors.


26 posted on 08/24/2016 12:26:22 PM PDT by Eddie01 (Democrats are the Liquidate America Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sad thing is there’s nothing that happens on earth the NYT doesn’t know everything about by the next day. Their apparatus is a well oiled machine used only in furtherance of leftism. Think of the fly on the wall jokes you’ve heard, they’re the fly on the wall. Think of the stories they write and knowingly leave out the truth.


28 posted on 08/24/2016 1:13:25 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yet with all the complaints about this rag which should be no longer in existence. What gets me is to hear some conservative talk host use it as a news source.


29 posted on 08/24/2016 2:16:25 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (My best insights get lost in FR's because of meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It probably is honey, but it’s the truth, so you have to print it.


30 posted on 08/24/2016 3:18:08 PM PDT by Bellflower (Dems = Mat 6:23 ....If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Old: “All the News That’s Fit to Print.”

New: “All the News That Fit’s, We Print.”

There, fixed it.


31 posted on 08/24/2016 4:05:18 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

32 posted on 08/24/2016 4:53:28 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (By His wounds we are healed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson