Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did The US Just Declare A No Fly Zone in Syria?
Conflict News ^ | 22 August 2016 | Michael Cruickshank

Posted on 08/22/2016 8:46:15 PM PDT by amorphous

Over the course of the 5 year-long civil war in Syria, the US has slowly escalated its military involvement. However one significant move which they have so far failed to implement is a No Fly Zone (NFZ) enforced by their aircraft over all (or just part) of Syria.

Despite this, today the US may have tacitly announced just such a NFZ. In a press conference this evening, the Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook, made a number of statements regarding US forces in Syria. These statements came following reports that the US backed SDF (Syrian Democratic Forces) had been bombed by Assad Regime aircraft in the city of Hasakah in northern Syria. Such airstrikes were also dangerously close to US Special Forces who were assisting the SDF in their fight against ISIS.

Specifically Peter Cook said that the US would use its airpower “as needed” to protect US personnel and partner operations. The aim of this was reportedly to send a message to other parties to “stay away from our forces”.

"We are fighting ISIL...and we will defend our forces,” Peter Cook also remarked.

Despite these comments Cook did take the time to deny that such a move would constitute a No Fly Zone. Given this denial, it’s worth looking at how the statement made by the Pentagon differs from a no fly zone.

In US military doctrine, an NFZ is enforced as an ‘Exclusion Zone’, wherein a specific action (in this case flying aircraft) is prohibited. Such a zone must exist over a defined geographic area, and should it be breached, it could be enforced through military means.

With this in mind, what was declared today by the Pentagon differs from what is commonly referred to as a No Fly Zone, for two key reasons. The first of these is that the US did not declare a specific geographic area in which they would use their airpower to defend their forces. Indeed they did not even specify which forces they meant. Secondly, the US statement suggests they would only take action to defend against aircraft should they attack US-aligned forces, rather than simply flying through the airspace.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blog; cook; hasakah; nfz; pentagon; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2016 8:46:16 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Has Russia just threatened nuclear war, again?


2 posted on 08/22/2016 8:47:44 PM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
No defined area. No defined "partners" to be protected.

The Russians and Syrians have to guess.

It doesn't get any stupider than that.

3 posted on 08/22/2016 8:51:39 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

I still think the HNIFC is going to do something to declare marital law and stay put


4 posted on 08/22/2016 8:55:04 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

So these fools are going to shoot down Russian planes?


5 posted on 08/22/2016 8:56:58 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

it’s another red line. they’ll unsay it in a week.


6 posted on 08/22/2016 8:58:05 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

If they fire one, we fire one.

Fire one, aye!

7 posted on 08/22/2016 9:05:30 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Leave it to obama to create a red line that will be crossed by Syria, Russia and Turkey - among others

Iraqis no fly zone was established by the UNSC - what authority does obama have to,put forces into sovereign Syria and the use that as an excuse to seize control of Syrian airspace?


8 posted on 08/22/2016 9:05:56 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

Not if the Russians declare a No Fly Zone too. Then they will shoot us down. Imagine WW III starting near where Har Maggendon is located....Who’d a thunk it?...


9 posted on 08/22/2016 9:06:03 PM PDT by MGG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

10 posted on 08/22/2016 9:06:06 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

“it’s another red line. they’ll unsay it in a week.”

BHO’s lines are Blue Lines. They are drawn with Magic Marxers.


11 posted on 08/22/2016 9:06:37 PM PDT by jessduntno (The mind of a liberal...deceit, desire for control, greed, contradiction and fueled by hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: al baby
I think that is a very real possibility too.

One of Roosevelt's motto's: better a third term than a third rate president. Yeah, I can see that being said by Obunga, about Trump, if he has to replace Hitlery, who may be forced to drop out.

12 posted on 08/22/2016 9:06:40 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

If Obama wants WW4 bad enough, he’ll probably find it.

Who knew that a bunch of hajis would be worth starting the Big One over?


13 posted on 08/22/2016 9:07:37 PM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot; al baby

Lol, there’s some funny guys on this here thread. ;-)


14 posted on 08/22/2016 9:08:39 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green

This would be WW III. WW IV will be fought with sticks an stones.


15 posted on 08/22/2016 9:08:50 PM PDT by MGG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

good movie


16 posted on 08/22/2016 9:13:52 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

How about a curfew at say 10:00 PM.


17 posted on 08/22/2016 9:18:17 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter
good movie

Yep, accurate enough to be scary.

18 posted on 08/22/2016 9:19:44 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green

http://www.unz.com/freed/hillary-trump-and-war-with-russia/


19 posted on 08/22/2016 9:22:35 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
I dunno.

But I do know that the Muslim-In-Chief soiled himself in fear, and that it stinks, as usual.

20 posted on 08/22/2016 9:26:30 PM PDT by kiryandil (Hillary Clinton is not sophisticated enough to understand the Bill of Rights, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson