Posted on 08/21/2016 4:52:58 PM PDT by Pushead
Donald Trump is going to be elected president. The American people voted for him a long time ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
Rosenblum laments idiot programs on TV but neglects to realize the target audience is millenials and younger generations. These are the demographics the hildabeast claims as hers.
But he is talking about the LIV’s.
High school arguments. I’ve no fear seeing articles like this as they are strictly in the choir book.
Chill, people... this is Huffington Post. It’s not like its a legitimate outlet or anything.
Summary....
‘If only everyone was a smart and sophisticated as we HuffandPuffers, Clinton would win in an avalanche.’
The Odds have it ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eX_2kHEaE34&list=PL55RDEKmNpTc6bYsRRGaPYwxZUvrK_Fa7&index=8
The author of that article.
Had better learn to write.
In real paragraphs.
Honestly...
Thats just how it is. Depressing, but true.
The author is saying that Trump is cheap, mindless, stupid entertainment. People who watch stupid TV programs really like Trump and will vote for him.
The author gets it 100% wrong. People who watch “Who be yo daddy?” are going to vote for hillary. The “2 and 1/2 men” fans are pulling the Democrat lever.
A really strange article, written by an incompetent author, who really thinks he is convincing us to vote for Hillary because she is boring entertainment.
We havent had 65% eligible voter turnout since 1908. Most of the time since that it has been much less, and of course local and state elections and even lower.
So would be worse or better off if turnout was consistently higher? I suspect a higher turnout would only increase the swing voters as a %, the folks who vote based on things like perceived popularity of a candidate or an accidental debate flub or someones appearance. The really wild thing is that the 10% or so of eligible voters who are swing voters supposedly decide all elections, no matter if a con or lib or pub or dem wins, based on how they happened to be swayed that cycle.
Freegards
“They voted for him when The History Channel went from showing documentaries about the Second World War to Pawn Stars and Swamp People.”
This guy’s been propagandizing at NYT tv for too long. Hes saying that voting for Trump is trashy? That it signifies our collective dive toward tacky? When Hillary is the con artist who has tricked half the people in this country. As if she has class and the American people don’t. Where is the evidence that Hillary has any class? That her supporters do?
“The same goes for people who are being asked by pollsters for whom they are voting. They will not say Donald Trump. It is too embarrassing”
Embarrassing? No. The people who support Trump are holding their breath. They know that they have a leader. They know that if they say anything about it to a liberal, and that includes liberals who call themselves conservatives, that they will be barraged and at the least, labeled as evil. And treated as such. They’re tired of it. The lack of freedom of speech. They see an end to it
” Hillary is Judy Woodruff” no. She is Eleanor Clift -who I hear is nice in life. But she does screech and she is an unthinking liberal. Really h is a villainous character. Cruella deville but he was talking news people
“The author is saying that Trump is cheap, mindless, stupid entertainment. People who watch stupid TV programs really like Trump and will vote for him.”
Those are the people who voted for Obozo!
Still have two treasured possessions:
Captain Video glow-in-the-dark white plastic belt with secret decoder ring on the back of the rocket-shaped belt buckle, and unofficial plastic screen overlay upon which to draw ropes & ladders to help Winky-Dink pull himself out of trouble.
Unofficial since it's a square of plastic wrap ripped from a standard roll. Couldn't afford 25 cents for the official one, back in 1956.
All I care about is the title “Donald Trump is going to be elected”. They are giving up in spirit...LOL Trump is going to win big !!! It will be such a fun election night !!
The best I have read from the Huffington Post ever. They have surrendered.
She was a level-headed dancer on the road to alcohol
And I was just a soldier on my way to Montreal
Well she pressed her chest against me
About the time the juke box broke
Yeah, she gave me a peck on the back of the neck
And these are the words she spoke
[Chorus:]
Blow up your TV throw away your paper
Go to the country, build you a home
Plant a little garden, eat a lot of peaches
Try and find Jesus on your own
I didn’t even have to read this dross to know it was just going to p!$$ me off.
Screw Huffington.
EXACTLY!
Had better learn to write.
In real paragraphs.
There are a gazillion graduates of universities in English or literature or some such who can write very well and are looking for remunerative employment. But the media doesn't hire them. Instead it hires bimbos like this meathead.
The problem is that to write well you have to be able to think - meaning marshalling facts and arguments to lead to a conclusion. They clearly don't want any of that.
Another elitist scumbag from UC Berkeley who just knows that liberals like him are so much smarter than the average stupid American conservative.
This guy may think he’s smart but he’s an idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.