Posted on 08/21/2016 7:46:58 AM PDT by farming pharmer
Many people watching Milwaukee burn on the news from the safety of their homes in the suburbs feel immune. It seems like this only happens in big cities, right? “These people are burning down their own neighborhoods, how ridiculous,” observers say. They feel safe in their belief that the issue is merely a war on cops, and it’s nothing that could happen to them.
While cities like Milwaukee and Baltimore have been hard hit, keep in mind that Ferguson, Missouri is a relatively small town with a population of just over 21,000 people at the last census.
Suburbia isn’t the safe haven many believe it to be. And guess who is covering up the threat? That’s right. The mainstream news. It certainly wouldn’t be politically correct if they were to air the fact that the sister of the armed man shot by police in Milwaukee actually directed her fellow rioters to head to the suburbs.
In fact, CNN did the complete opposite. They carefully edited a clip and flat out said Sherelle Smith was calling for peace. In my part of the world, they would call this kind of deception a lie, not a “mistake”.
(Excerpt) Read more at theorganicprepper.ca ...
“I didn’t understand one word he said. “
Why? (Not sarcasm,just curious)
.
In liberal strongholds, the police will be ordered to disarm suburban residents "in the interests of public safety". The police will follow those orders. Residents who use any type of force in self-defense will be arrested. Rioters will not be arrested, though a few may be killed by residents.
You can expect severe restrictions on the sale or possession of ammunition after the first such incident.
There will be multiple waves of suburban invasion before this changes. There will also need to be replacement of discredited public officials at various levels. (Think sudden resignations or firings of police chiefs and city managers for example).
The Glenn Echo riot in the 60s. Large mob of inner city youts threatened upscale suburban homes as they made their way back to the city.
They were met with lots and lots of 12 gauge shotguns. Not a shot was fired, and not a single home was touched. The news first reported it, then later forgot the details.
I think that when such a threat to suburbia becomes a reality, so many other circumstances will have also been altered; the most important of which, (if you live in suburbia); I believe, will be the ability to drive on interstates and other freeways to flee the chaos. I always think of the grid-lock on I-95 during Katrina. For all people, but for many people in particular, reliance on God will be their only hope!
USSA / Leftist Social Engineering bump for later....
Yeah, but what about the rioters? ;o)
The body count will be so great the media will have to cover it.
We have a Rwanda style event brewing with all the race pandering by politicians. It’s dangerous stuff to play with just to get them elected.
But in either case you need a group to keep your area safe. So get to know your neighbors. Most will not be into prepping but there are ways to get them to agree to work together.
One of the best is organize an emergency fire brigade.
Out in the country it can be fifteen to twenty minutes until the fire trucks can get to you best case scenario.
A fire on one property can spread in that time from one property to several.
Once you get people used to the idea of working together rather then one family working and everyone else standing around it can transition very quickly into a community defense group.
Whether in big city or suburb, all types of demonstrations are just a very small percentage of the population. That is true of both violent and non-violent demonstrations.
Million Man marches rarely have even 100,000 marchers.
After MLK was assassinated there were a lot of fires on the West side of Chicago. Most of those fires were set by members of Axelrod’s political organization to collect insurance and to get out of the neighborhood their parents grew up in. Most of those fires were not set by “angry Black rioters”. I know. I was the insurance investigator on the street during the riots and afterward.
There were Black rioters. But they were very few.
Of course, there are also the professional rioters, the Al Sharpton wannabes who go from fire to fire. They are skilled at getting infront of the TV camera so it seems like a lot of people when it isn’t.
Most Blacks do not burn down their own neighborhood.
Theoretically, of course.
(no charge ;-)
800 miles is exactly what I came up with:)
What does that mean?
I was there on the West Side of Chicago in ‘68. The fires were widespread, looting was rampant, and the rioters were many. Many.
Shooting rioters and looters is the way to prevent future riots.
Even the belief that you’ll not tolerate rioters and looters helps to prevent them.
Just as tolerating rioters and looters, even protecting them from law enforcement after the rioting is done, is the way to insure you suffer riot after riot in endless succession
Occasionally some anarchists or bloke who thinks it horrible that I say rioters and looters should be shot by those whose lives, persons, or property they threaten will bluster how those defending themselves will be outnumbered; but, when they do so they neglect the utter lack of discipline or tactical awareness that are two big the things that separates mere rioters from an uprising like with the Battle of Athens (which was NOT menacing any private citizen’s life or propery, and didn’t even seek to harm the homes or other property of the Sheriff and deputies in question).
No, rioters and looters have all the soldierly discipline of herded cats.
So, you can prevail with much inferior numbers so long as you’ve got resolve and especially if you are loaded for bear.
The survivors won’t become emboldened to fight back but will scurry for cover.
Cracker doesn’t want any trouble. Cracker doesn’t need any trouble. Don’t bring any trouble to Cracker.
Cracker is ready for trouble.
That rule of thumb has been around a long time. When big cities were less common and fuel economy worse. Take that into account.
http://nypost.com/2016/08/21/american-journalism-is-collapsing-before-our-eyes/
Donald Trump may or may not fix his campaign, and Hillary Clinton may or may not become the first female president. But something else happening before our eyes is almost as important: the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it.
The frenzy to bury Trump is not limited to the Clinton campaign and the Obama White House. They are working hand-in-hand with what was considered the cream of the nation’s news organizations.
The shameful display of naked partisanship by the elite media is unlike anything seen in modern America.
The largest broadcast networks — CBS, NBC and ABC — and major newspapers like The New York Times and Washington Post have jettisoned all pretense of fair play. Their fierce determination to keep Trump out of the Oval Office has no precedent.
...
Indeed, no foreign enemy, no terror group, no native criminal gang, suffers the daily beating that Trump does. The mad mullahs of Iran, who call America the Great Satan and vow to wipe Israel off the map, are treated gently by comparison.
More at link...
Will be war in many places outside the cities. They best choose liberal areas outside the cities to attack. No where in Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.