Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept.: 'No Evidence' That 'Deliberately Edited' Videotape Was Meant to Conceal Information
Cybercast News Service ^ | August 19, 2016 | 7:00 AM EDT | Susan Jones

Posted on 08/20/2016 4:34:49 PM PDT by Olog-hai

The U.S. State Department on Thursday said there is “no evidence” that a “deliberately edited” videotape of its Dec. 2, 2013 State Department briefing was intended to “conceal information from the public,” even though someone requested the edit.

Spokesman John Kirby said a months-long internal investigation was unable to identify the person who asked for the edit: “And while the technician recalls receiving a phone call requesting the edit, there is no evidence to indicate who might’ve placed that call or why.”

Kirby also said even if the video was edited with the intent to conceal, “There was no policy in place at the time prohibiting such an act.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bhostatedept; coverup; iran; kirby; rop; soskerry; statedept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
So destruction of evidence is not illegal because of presumed internal policy? Wow.
1 posted on 08/20/2016 4:34:49 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Obola gets to investigate himself.How very....convenient.
2 posted on 08/20/2016 4:36:43 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Rat Party,try as it might,just isn't very good at hiding what it *truly* is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

No rule of law.
No nation


3 posted on 08/20/2016 4:37:01 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So, tech guy gets a call, from somebody (a Nigerian ???), requesting an edit.
Tech guy says oky doky, and makes the edit.

Thats their story, and they are sticking to it!


4 posted on 08/20/2016 4:39:28 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden

Amen brother


5 posted on 08/20/2016 4:40:35 PM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wardamneagle

We decide if there is wrong doing, well we look really hard and can never find any.


6 posted on 08/20/2016 4:43:59 PM PDT by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

TRANSLATION: “Yeah, we know, you caught us red-handed, but we’re not going to admit a thing, and there is nothing you can do about it.”


7 posted on 08/20/2016 4:44:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Spokesman John Kirby ...”

Substitute: Paid Liar John Kirby .... Then it all makes perfect sense!


8 posted on 08/20/2016 4:45:30 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (The Mofia is a private crime family; whereas, the DOJ is the gov't's political crime family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There is no evidence the State Department is telling the truth.

Two can play this game.


9 posted on 08/20/2016 4:46:24 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

there is no evidence to indicate who might’ve placed that call or why.
= = =

‘edit out all instances of xxxxx.’

‘OK, I’m on it.’

And no questioning of Who are you???? or why????


10 posted on 08/20/2016 4:49:36 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

If Julian Assange will give us that tech guy’s number we can all call him up and give him edit requests.


11 posted on 08/20/2016 4:49:39 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Our government lies and the media helps them.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“There was no evidence”... do they really think this line holds water with most rational adults? It was requested, it was edited, and it was surely to cover up some very bad act by someone high up enough to have the authority to request the edit. That leaves a very short list of possibilities.


12 posted on 08/20/2016 4:50:26 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“No Evidence” is classic Clintonspeak.


13 posted on 08/20/2016 4:51:31 PM PDT by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

look just how rapidly the Clintonian way of thinking is spreading.

The fish rots from the head down.


14 posted on 08/20/2016 4:54:13 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny500c; SunkenCiv; governsleastgovernsbest

“The videotape of that 2013 news briefing — posted on the State Department’s website and YouTube channel — omitted part of an exchange between spokesman Jen Psaki and Fox News reporter James Rosen, who asked Psaki if the State Department lied to protect the secrecy of nuclear negotiations with Iran.

“James, there are times when diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress. This is a good example of that,” Psaki replied at the time.

That exchange was included in the eight minutes deleted from the video and replaced with a white flash.

Thursday’s State Department briefing began with an update on the case from spokesman John Kirby, and we post it here almost in its entirety:

“As you know, when this matter came to light, many of us, including Secretary Kerry, had concerns and questions as to how and why this had happened. And so at the secretary’s request, the Office of the Legal Advisers spent the last several months looking deeper into the issue,” he said.

“All told, they have spoken with more than 30 current and former employees at all levels of seniority, and they’ve gone through e-mails and other documents to see what information might be available. They’ve now compiled their findings and a description of their process into a fact-finding review, which has been provided to the secretary. We’re also sharing it today with Congress and the inspector general.”

OK. But when Planned Parenthood was filmed BOASTING about selling aborted babies for “spare parts” THAT editing WAS “evidence of concealment” and made the entire issue proof of false claims!


15 posted on 08/20/2016 5:00:25 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

🙉🙈🙊 Crooks and liars thru and thru.
16 posted on 08/20/2016 5:05:26 PM PDT by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

No “ruling authority” to do anything about it. The neutered Congress doesn’t count.


17 posted on 08/20/2016 5:16:07 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
There we go again...you gotta prove intent. < p>
doesn't the fact that you did it prove some kind of intent?
18 posted on 08/20/2016 5:23:48 PM PDT by oldbrowser (The 2nd amendment is to protect us from tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“The U.S. State Department on Thursday said there is “no evidence” that a “deliberately edited” videotape of its Dec. 2, 2013 State Department briefing was intended to “conceal information from the public,””

Except for the FACT that the edit concealed information from the public which is evidence in my book.


19 posted on 08/20/2016 5:31:46 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

We have investigated ourselves and found that there was no wrongdoing. Isn’t a leftist world grand? If you’re in power anyway.


20 posted on 08/20/2016 5:31:47 PM PDT by vpintheak (Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson