Clerits!!! Tessa!!
This means our emancipation from the Clintons. Right?
One more reason to Vote Trump 2016!
LEXIT would be better.
The Left is certifiably unhinged. They sure picked the right nominee this year. She's the queen of the unhinged.
Has Trump proposed eliminating the requirements for industries to clean their emissions before discharging them into rivers or through smokestacks? Has he proposed to eliminate clean emissions requirements for cars? I don't recall seeing or hearing Trump advocate *any* kind of reversal of clean air/water policies.
Furthermore, I would argue that the desire to eliminate carbon dioxide demonstrates a profound ignorance of science. Carbon dioxide is the building block of life--without it, nothing survives. (I cannot discount the possibility that the fearmongers of "climate change" are perfectly aware of this fact, and that the destruction of life on earth is, in fact, their end goal.)
Lifting restrictions on American energy would boost the U.S. GDP by $100 billion and jobs by 500,000 annually.
That's a good start. Not to sound critical of Trump, but we need a lot more than 500,000 new jobs per year to undo the damage Obama has done to the job market. Trump's website says that 14 million have been pushed out of the job market in the last 7 years--so we need 2 million per year just to catch up to pre-Obama numbers.
Don't get me wrong on this--Trump's overall economic plan is vastly superior to Hillary's plan to appoint a committee to look at why the employment rate is so low (and then, no doubt, to reject any committee recommendation that includes actual capitalistic/sensible pro-growth measures).
My first reaction was, "why would Cleveland want to leave the US"...
...squeaks of dismay...
Ruckelshaus originated the politics-first-science-to-follow philosophy that rules the EPA.