Posted on 08/08/2016 12:51:19 AM PDT by Enlightened1
The Communist Party USA may not control many actual votes, but what they lack in support is made up for in enthusiasm.
That passion was in full display with a seven-person team of “reporters” covering their national political convention last month. And their convention was the Democratic National Convention that nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed candidate for president of the United States.
Exaggeration? Judge for yourself.
Here are excerpts from the editorial produced as part of that coverage by the team credentialed to cover the convention by the Democratic Party.
“Donald Trump steals wages. He’d pick your pocket in a New York minute. He lies and spreads hate. He’s a racist and a bully.”
“Do not underestimate Trump and the Republicans. While the establishment GOP was surprised by the successful insurgency of so-called outsider Trump, they are united in purpose: delivering more inequality, more misery, more instability and violence against working-class people of all races, genders, religions and sexual orientations. They are united with giant corporations and the billionaire class in their drive to lower wages and living conditions and increase their profits and power.”
“With Senator Bernie Sanders endorsing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the message was loud and clear, “We’re stronger together.” That is what it will take to win in November.”
The Communists, who for decades ran their own candidates for president and vice president but supported Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, don’t just like Hillary and Bernie. The party also gave a big thumbs-up to Clinton’s running mate, Tim Kaine.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
These kids need to be referred to what is going on in Venezuela.
They’ve been the Democrat Party’s “steering committee” for decades. Pretty much openly, too; the evidence has been plain to see for anyone who cared to look.
I’d say round up and deport every known liberal to there.
Hey, maybe “Wormtongue” is Huma’s USSS codename. It works on multiple levels.
Hillary says she is a Progressive,read Whitaker Chambers book “Witness”,in it Mr. Chambers A former member of the communist party, describes how the Communist party in the US,could not very well advertise themselves as The Communist party USA,so they adopted a moniker to camouflage who they were,they decide to call themselves PROGRESSIVES.
I agree. Better that the libs experience it first-hand. They’d only accuse right-wingers of making up stories.
“The Communist Party of America endorsed Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed candidate for president of the United States.”.......
So who’s surprised at that? Wake up people.
No one should be. They did the same for 0. On a certain level a lot of the camouflage is no longer needed but I doubt anyone will ask H about this. I don’t recall anyone asking 0 about it. When one watches the MSM you can tell the background assumptions are that the leftist viewpoint is the truth and anything that goes against that truth is at first ignored and if it cannot be ignored it is molded to fit the leftist narrative.
it shows that communist party is corrupt . Hillary is more neo-con, pro wall street than Trump
So are the #Nevertrumpers...
See if I want to start a business then i make a market analysis to see if my product is needed in the market . Then I have to work really hard to actually produce a quality product . In socialism government idiots just grant the money to produce a product because they think it will work but it's never put the the test out in the free market against competition to see if there really is a demand for the product they granted billions to produce. So socialism can never work. These government agencies get a billion dollar budget regardless if they produce something that is needed or not or if they produce anything at all . That's just wasteful and not efficient.
When I was a kid, my father used to guffaw at Gus's candidacy announcements since the idea of Americans electing a communist as President was so beyond the pale.
And now....
First Burnie, now the Party...but I repeat myself...are flocking around Herself. Anyway, I’m in. /S
As some Brothers were inclined to say in the 60’s-70’s; “Wait ‘Till the Revolution.”
Despite Putin rebranding Russia as a Christian, Orthodox nation, it seems likely that Russian intelligence is still funding the American Communists. If Putin wanted Trump to win, you would think the Communist Party USA would be promoting the Green Party, which is openly socialist. The party's advocacy of Hillary Clinton makes me think that the line about a Trump-Putin alliance spread by some liberals is a deliberate deception.
The CPUSA knows who their friends are.
BUT we will still hear, endlessly, about David Duke endorsing Trump.
BUT we will still hear, endlessly, about David Duke endorsing Trump.
There’s always the Party of Socialism and Liberation and the Socialist Worker’s Party, both avowedly Communist. not a lot of ballot access, especially for the later, which seems more like a Castro-lovers club than a party.
The pro-terrorist, pro-North Korea, Worker’s World Party also nominated a ticket after an 8 year hiatus (co-endorsed McKinney in 2008, no one in 2012) but have no ballot access, write in’s in Ohio.
Imagine what kind of hardcore nutter you have to be to not only think the dems are too far right but the Greens and Peace and Freedom ect as well. The vast majority are fine with the rats.
I’m fascinated by the psychology behind these no chancer candidates who would be lucky to get a hundredth of a percentage point.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.