How about BLM or Malcolm X hats?
Filed under “Utter Crap”.
We need some black conservative group to start filing complaints demanding that the Democrat Party and all of its literature, symbols, campaign materials, etc. be outlawed because of its exclusive history as the agent and facilitator of slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, the Ku Klux Klan, etc.
When one’s only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
What would these racist bastards know about “workplace” harassment. They’ve never had real jobs.
Let me guess, BLM pins are OK.
Time to get rid of all the “civil rights” laws. They are only used to favor one group over another. Actual institutional racism is no longer socially acceptable. We no longer need these laws.
That’s how it’s done. you don’t MAKE a law that limits free speech. You just make practicing it illegal.
This reminds me of a 1970s movie called “Spririt of 76.” I think it starred David Cassidy. In a futuristic world everyone is stuck wearing drab grey clothes and the national anthem is nothing more than a single tone blared out over loud speakers.
Methinks Matt’s updated EFAD version needs much wider distribution on many more forms (pins, licence plates, etc).
Such censorship relies on coercively-imposed restrictions on speech which, in America, was intended to be that speech which was unrestrained by political fiat or that which might "offend" another.
As a matter of fact, that great champion of the rights of conscience and free speech, Thomas Jefferson, stated:
"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."Contrast that idea of freedom with the group think imposed on college and university students who are subject to haughty and arrogant "professors," bureaucrats and politicians of the "progressive" mindset!
These assorted mind controllers have concluded the view expressed by Thomas Jefferson here is dangerous and must be opposed. Their bias in favor of "progressivism" blinds them to the real intent and purpose of the First Amendment's protections.
In a truly racist, harassing environment the complainant would be found dead in a ditch.
I guess the stickers on the back of my vehicles and plates on the front now constitute harassment, whereas I intend them merely as a warning...
Who cares? What’s worse is, we’ve ALL been tread on, OVER & OVER. And here we sit, thumbs up our noses. As the crooked one suggests, what does it matter?
He should wear a pin to work with the pictures of Washington and Jefferson on it.
Just ordered one of these flags for the front yard.
The Gadsden flag represents nothing more than a contempt for central authority, and a symbol of independence from same. That is what it was originally, that is what it is now. The only things that have changed are:
1) The original central authority that it was aimed at was the British government and King George, whereas the present display of that flag are now aimed at our overbearing, interfering, power-usurping federal government - the one that no longer represents us, as England no longer represented us as of no later than 1776; and
2) Now there are a bunch of ill-educated, benefit-seeking, moronic special snowflakes that couldn’t find their asses with two hands, and who wouldn’t know actual history if it ran them over.
Why does equal always mean create a protected class with extra rights for certain people? It’s like they’ve never looked at a dictionary before.
On the same grounds, the US Constitution is racist (2/3rds count) and the image of the Minuteman is racist (they were all white). The complainant is seeking to declare all non-left THOUGHT an indicator of a hostile workplace. I wonder if this workplace is the IRS? Dangerous to have someone working there who is not a true-believer!