Posted on 08/04/2016 8:56:50 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together
Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.
Khan and his wife Ghazala Khan both appeared on stage at the Democratic National Convention to attack, on Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s behalf, Donald Trump—the Republican nominee for president. Their son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, was killed in Iraq in 2004. Khizr Khan, in his speech to the DNC, lambasted Donald Trump for wanting to temporarily halt Islamic migration to America from countries with a proven history of exporting terrorists.
Since then, Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos—who served as a senior adviser to the president in Bill Clinton’s White House and is a Clinton Foundation donor as well as a host on the ABC network—pushed Trump on the matter in an interview. Trump’s comments in that interview have sparked the same mini-rebellion inside his party, in the media and across the aisle that has happened many times before. The usual suspects inside the GOP, from former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to House Speaker Paul Ryan to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to Ohio Gov. John Kasich, have condemned Trump in one way or another.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The problem with pointing out that Khan is a longtime supporter of the Clintons is that the Democrats and their leftist allies see nothing wrong with that at all. Neither do they think that having him at the convention was exploitation. We need to focus on actual evidence of Khan’s law business, radicalism, and subversive activity.
Khan called Ryan and McConnell cowards. He’s pi$$ing on them and they continue to hide away in their little GOPe wuss world.
thanx for dusting this off.
what I’m curious about is connecting the dots from kahn to the father of the orlando shooter mateen.
both are involved in bundling immigrants from afghanistan/pakistan region.
it has been reported that mateen sr. visited state department and white mosque.
has kahn been to state or white mosque too?
did kahn’s law firm represent mateen in his florida afghan immigrant colonization business?
would be interested in hearing what you know on this.
The Clinton people used the death of a soldier for political purposes. The parents of this soldier used the death of their own son to make a political statement.(Else why did they appear at a political convention.) HAVE THESE PEOPLE NO SHAME?
I read that Khan’s New York office is next door to Cheryl Mills’.
Don’t remember where I read that.
Breibart is doing yeoman’s work on this guy.
Of course nobody else out there is hearing a damn word about it.
hmmm. thanx for the heads up boots.
Sure.
It’s odd that he came out of nowhere to speak well at the DNC. That and the fact sheet and talking points right afterward.
Occam’s razor: he didn’t. This is Cindy Sheehan 2016, or the ‘binders’ of women II.
Not true, it was all over Drudge this AM.
The muslims already have their democrat party replacement for Obama ready to go.
You and I and other Trump supporters read Drudge.
I mean no one is getting these facts out to the population in general. Not even Trump (his twitter seems only to be about promoting upcoming campaign stops).
It is hard for them to get out much because their panties are in a wad.
True, but Drudge gets +30,000,000 in a 24 hour cycle, so that many people have seen the Khan stories.
Trump can’t personally attack the Golden Khan’s, others have to do it.
Trump needs to get some people to organize his responses to crap like this. A perfect response would be “I recognize and have the most respect for the sacrifices that the Kahn Family has made during this war. A war that their candidate voted for. I do not feel that gives them carte blanche to accuse me of not understanding the Constitution. When it comes to immigration the Democrat Party has repeatedly ignored laws passed by Congress and the Constitution by enacting illegal presidential directives.”
The annoying Khan's status is that of "foreign agent."
Trump should simply call him that.....and should also determine the following:
<><> the number of organizations Khan his family/friends/associates pledge allegiance to that advocate the overthrow of the US govt;
<><> how many US govt checks are Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associates cashing?
<><>did Khan claim "asylum" in the US to suck up monthly SS checks?
<><> did Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associates falsify govt documents to collect food stamps, welfare, Section 8 housing, free education, free medical care?
<><> did Khan ever travel to foreign lands on the taxpayers' dime (mandated by US law under refugee status)?
<><> are Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associates, collecting disability checks for fibromyalgia, Attention Deficit Disorder---or any of the common afflictions used among parasitic Muslim immigrants.
<><> what countries are Khan and/or his family/relatives/associates registered as agents for foreign governments;
<><>Americans demand to know how many identities Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associates are using?
<><> are Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associates registered to vote?
<><> did Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associates ever vote illegally?
<><> did Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associate pay local, state and federal taxes?
<><> did Khan and/or his family/ relatives/associate provide health insurance coverage for employees?
============================================
If Khan wont reply, Donald should sue Khan....b/c the answers to these questions can be obtained through the "discovery" phase.
Our independent voters, who are concerned about the dangers of Muslims are the ones who will say, “Hell no to Kahn!”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.