Yeah, so believable.
1 posted on
08/03/2016 4:17:52 PM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Nachum
If you like your guns, you can keep your guns.
Now let’s see.....where have I heard that before?
48 posted on
08/03/2016 4:51:23 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obamca loves America)
To: Nachum
49 posted on
08/03/2016 4:51:30 PM PDT by
Noumenon
(We owe them nothing: not respect, not loyalty, not obedience.)
To: Nachum
She just demands to bans guns.
50 posted on
08/03/2016 4:51:46 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
To: Nachum
51 posted on
08/03/2016 4:52:40 PM PDT by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Nachum
If Clintoon becomes our Potus, she will disarm us and make us like the poor guy below, running for his life! His crime, being a Trump supporter in San Jose earlier this year. He was run down by a Somali Islamic. The worthless Liberal San Jose Mayor and LaRaza police chief made sure their cops didn’t stop the violence against Trump supporters. San Jose has very strict gun control laws.
‘Rats want guns to kill others. Conservatives need guns to defend themselves from ‘Rat predators.’(Paladin2)
53 posted on
08/03/2016 5:00:24 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Like NSA. ItÂ’s the only part of the federal government that actually listens to the American people)
To: Nachum
Mr. Bismarck. Please pick up the white, courtesy phone. Otto von Bismarck....
55 posted on
08/03/2016 5:01:41 PM PDT by
mykroar
(Democrats in 2016: The party of genitalia, real or imagined.)
To: Nachum
Lawyerspeak...I don’t want to...but I will if I have to...
56 posted on
08/03/2016 5:01:53 PM PDT by
bike800
To: Nachum
58 posted on
08/03/2016 5:04:08 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Like NSA. ItÂ’s the only part of the federal government that actually listens to the American people)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Clinton: ‘I do not want to repeal the 2nd Amendment’
‘And I can tell you THAT lie with a straight face, just like Obama did with keeping your doctor and your insurance plan.’
{CACKLES}
62 posted on
08/03/2016 5:09:34 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Nachum
Why would she have to roll back the 2nd when she can put two judges in SCOTUS that will make it forever meaningless?
No need to go through any effort in repealing something that she’ll sidestep at every turn.
63 posted on
08/03/2016 5:09:35 PM PDT by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: Nachum
Clinton: ‘I do not want to repeal the 2nd Amendment’
She’s actually a big believer in coal, too.
Every thread I’ve read so far has Democrats saying the exact opposite of what they actually do, believe and want to do.
64 posted on
08/03/2016 5:10:12 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Nachum
keep Hilliary out of office and all of our constitutionally-recogized liberties will be that much safer
65 posted on
08/03/2016 5:10:36 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
To: Nachum
She has never said she wants to repeal the 2nd A. She HAS said she wants to ban pistols, ‘assault weapons’, and plenty of other anti-gun statements.
To: Nachum
Clinton: ‘I do not want to repeal the 2nd Amendment’ This statement is in the category of:
Bath House: If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor."
70 posted on
08/03/2016 5:16:43 PM PDT by
bkopto
To: Nachum
“Clinton: ‘I do not want to repeal the 2nd Amendment’”
If you like your 2nd Amendment, you can keep your 2nd Amendment
To: Nachum
That’s good Hillary, because you’re not going to. Not without a war.
74 posted on
08/03/2016 5:28:54 PM PDT by
Trod Upon
(Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
To: Nachum
Yeah, right, Hitlery.
And Pamela Anderson is a virgin. Uh-huh.
To: Nachum
Negate it. Ignore it. Redfine and rearrange the words in it. But she won’t repeal it.
78 posted on
08/03/2016 5:38:58 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: Nachum
Why go to the trouble to repeal it when you just need a majority on the SCOTUS to redefine its meaning?
79 posted on
08/03/2016 5:41:48 PM PDT by
Feckless
(The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson