Yeah, so believable.
1 posted on
08/03/2016 4:17:52 PM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Nachum
2 posted on
08/03/2016 4:18:20 PM PDT by
Fungi
(Make America America again.)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
3 posted on
08/03/2016 4:19:00 PM PDT by
Nachum
(ISIS is alive... and Chris Stevens is dead)
To: Nachum
An evil pathological liar.
4 posted on
08/03/2016 4:19:04 PM PDT by
Fungi
(Make America America again.)
To: Nachum
Because she doesn’t need to. Just stack the Supreme Court with liberals.
5 posted on
08/03/2016 4:19:04 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: Nachum
LIAR!
6 posted on
08/03/2016 4:20:34 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Nachum
Hitlery doesn’t want to “repeal” it, she wants to shred it.
7 posted on
08/03/2016 4:20:42 PM PDT by
laplata
( Speaking The Truth Is Now Considered 'Hate Speech')
To: Nachum
We already know exactly what she thinks.
8 posted on
08/03/2016 4:20:55 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Nachum
I do not want to appeal the 2nd Amendment... I WANT TO PICK SEVERAL SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHO WILL DO THAT FOR ME! Silly conservatives!
10 posted on
08/03/2016 4:21:48 PM PDT by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
To: Nachum
Being the liar she is means it will be her first priority or close.
11 posted on
08/03/2016 4:21:53 PM PDT by
Karliner
( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
To: Nachum
With pants that are so frequently afire, you’d think that she’d lose some flab to the heat.
12 posted on
08/03/2016 4:22:17 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: Nachum
She’s against the Heller decision and wants Australian-style confiscation. On record. FUHRC
13 posted on
08/03/2016 4:22:27 PM PDT by
Mjreagan
To: Nachum
14 posted on
08/03/2016 4:22:51 PM PDT by
Jim W N
To: Nachum
She didn’t receive classified info either. /sarc
15 posted on
08/03/2016 4:22:56 PM PDT by
ealgeone
To: Nachum
I'm also a proven liar and in a true democratic country I'd be in Prison. Step right up sheeple I insist on your vote.
16 posted on
08/03/2016 4:24:08 PM PDT by
DAC21
To: Nachum
No no no no no NO, I will ban the use and possession of all ammunition!!
17 posted on
08/03/2016 4:24:37 PM PDT by
Shady
(We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
To: Nachum
Liar, liar, Mao suit on fire.
18 posted on
08/03/2016 4:25:04 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(<<<<<a<< he no longer IS my 'teddy bear'.)
To: Nachum
Of course she doesn’t. That’s virtually impossible. She just wants to make it hard to buy a gun, own a gun that is useful for defense or rebellion, buy ammunition, or have a place to shoot.
As an anti-gun co-worker once told me, “we want to make it so you can sit at home with you massive gun collection and masturbate all you want.” This would be her plan too.
19 posted on
08/03/2016 4:25:21 PM PDT by
Bryanw92
(If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
To: Nachum
She doesn’t need to.
If they can pretend the 10th amendment says the exact opposite of what it does, they can do the same with the others.
20 posted on
08/03/2016 4:26:00 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: Nachum
She left out the part “Trust me”.
21 posted on
08/03/2016 4:26:12 PM PDT by
Bringbackthedraft
(HILLARY 2016 - SERIOUSLY? What are they thinking?)
To: Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson