Posted on 07/31/2016 7:03:45 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Julian Assange: So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates.
So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, thats there in those emails. Theres more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clintons collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Look, what’s done is done! What difference does it make?
I wonder how many of the 1700 were turned over by Hillary, and how many were deleted as part of the 30,000 she didn't turn over.
Somebody at the Trump campaign better be devouring this stuff if for nothing else, to use during the debates. If Hillary tries to wiggle out of (lie about) the contents, Trump can simply state: "Fine I'll post them to my website tomorrow for all to see".
She needs to be arrested by foreign countries. They probably have war crimes laws also. She is too big to jail here.
Assange made Chuck Todd look like the amateur he is.
If they did, they sure didn't offer to loan it out.
Hillary Clinton Email Archive - LIBYA SEARCH
Especially interesting are the ones from SID BLUMENTHAL.
Hillary has been so corrupt for decades. For 20 years at least, every time I shred a big batch of papers, I refer to it as doing a Hillary Clinton.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3455136/posts
Whistleblower’s Stunning Claim: “NSA Has All Of Hillary’s Deleted Emails, It May Be The Leak”
zerohedge.com ^ | August 1st, 2016
Posted on 8/1/2016, 6:34:48 AM by Helicondelta
Binney was an architect of the NSAs surveillance program. He became a famed whistleblower when he resigned on October 31, 2001, after spending more than 30 years with the agency. He referenced testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2011 by then-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in which Meuller spoke of the FBIs ability to access various secretive databases to track down known and suspected terrorists.
Now what he (Mueller) is talking about is going into the NSA database, which is shown of course in the (Edward) Snowden material released, which shows a direct access into the NSA database by the FBI and the CIA. Which there is no oversight of by the way. So that means that NSA and a number of agencies in the U.S. government also have those emails. So if the FBI really wanted them they can go into that database and get them right now, he said of Clintons emails as well as DNC emails.
Asked point blank if he believed the NSA has copies of all of Clintons emails, including the deleted correspondence, Binney confirmed.
Yes, he responded. That would be my point. They have them all and the FBI can get them right there.
Binney then went on to speculate about something even more shocking: that the hack of the DNC could have been coordinated by someone inside the U.S. intelligence community angry over Clintons compromise of national security data with her email use.
That’s my take too.
He’s explaining what’s in the emails since nobody has bothered to read them and figure it out.
“Binney then went on to speculate about something even more shocking: that the hack of the DNC could have been coordinated by someone inside the U.S. intelligence community angry over Clintons compromise of national security data with her email use.”
That would make more sense than Russia. Someone knowing there is evidence against her would know what to look for.
And I doubt Russia wants to deal with Trump. He’ll put America first, and that won’t be beneficial for them.
This sh*t is just about to get “real”!
This is the wikileaks dump from March, I have no idea whats there, never searched them.
Went back to more thoroughly read the original article and realized that the dump Assange is referring to is not that 30,000 from March but the DNC hack:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
Sheesh, that's only 20,000 and we (hopefully) don't even have to deal with any FOIA redactions in this batch.
Becoming a bit more obvious why the 'rats have had their drawers in such a knot over it anyway.....
To those who are on Facebook, do you post these kinds of articles to your pages? Even if just one of your friends reads it and/or shares it, I think it will make a difference! Just my two cents. :-)
Published on “Democracy Now”, hard core liberal group.
Wow!
I went to the https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/ link.
The problem is that it WON’T let you put in a SEARCH term.
(Faking Bogus Investigations)
???
Works fine for me. (Of course, there’s always the chance to blame it on Win10 and NSA demons...)
Maybe if you go to https://wikileaks.org and select from their menu on that page......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.