Posted on 07/22/2016 2:29:31 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Billionaire Mark Cuban took to Twitter on Friday to say how presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton should change her strategies to win the presidential election.
"Hillary Clinton marketing of herself is awful. It's straight out of 1995. It's not newsfeed or social media literate at all," Cuban said in his stream of tweets.
The Dallas Mavericks owner said Clinton's marketing messages needed to be simplified and that they need "to tell people why they should vote for her in one short sentence or less."
Cuban also suggested that Clinton go into "enemy territory" and do five interviews a day with Fox News.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
And this is just one more reason Trump will win
He knows media
Meanwhile, Donald J. Trump took lessons from how the Obama campaign used social media and built a gigantic presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Snapchat. No wonder why Trump is running rings around Hillary, but the Left is very loathe to admit that.
Didn’t Cuban suggest he would be open to being her VP? He must know she’s stupid and he would actually be pResident if he were the VP and she was able to cheat her way back into the WH.
And never will. She and Bill both are lost in the sixties again
“to tell people why they should vote for her in one short sentence or less.”
ooh ooh let me help!
“Hillary Clinton knows the names and addresses of each of your children.”
“Hillary won’t go down without taking everyone else with her!”
“Thanks to unverifiable electronic voting, it doesn’t actually matter what you think”
Lock her up.
“Hillary Clinton marketing of herself is awful. It’s straight out of 1995.”
This is understandable since she says she doesn’t know how email works.
Best strategy for Hillary is to croak already and spare herself the embarrassment of getting schlonged, spare us that screeching Nurse Ratchet nightmare demeanor...
It's not the marketing that is awful.
The Dallas Mavericks owner said Clinton's marketing messages needed to be simplified and that they need "to tell people why they should vote for her in one short sentence or less."
The problem is that they have tried, but no one can come up with a simple reason to vote FOR her.
Cuban also suggested that Clinton go into "enemy territory" and do five interviews a day with Fox News.
Nobody, not FOX, not the public, not even Hillary Clinton, wants that to happen.
“Cuban also suggested that Clinton go into “enemy territory” and do five interviews a day...”
She hasn’t done five interviews THIS YEAR.
Here is my Hillary imitation tweet:
“Instead of doing a marijuana, vote for me!!”
Cuban is another billionaire commie. FU, Cuban.
And if the billionaire commie is saying this, she is already toast. She is so bad the DNC (Obama and co) already know they HAVE to replace her. Big Government has too much to lose if Trump is elected.
August 1. That is the day the window opens for the Clinton Foundation illegalities to come front and center, forcing her to step down, so Obama can install his puppets (Biden and Fauxcahontas?) and control the DNC.
What’s the difference between Hillary Clinton and Mark Cuban?
Lipstick.
Trey Gowdy:
“I’ve been asked tougher questions in the drive-thru at Bojangle’s.”
It has been observed that Hillary believes that the way to win an election is to get positive stories in the New York Times.
“The Dallas Mavericks owner said Clinton’s marketing messages needed to be simplified and that they need ‘to tell people why they should vote for her in one short sentence or less.’”
Mark Cuban does have a point here. The more people hear Hillary Clinton talk, the less they like her. So if she can cut back her talking to a bare minimum, that strategy just might work.
I said the same thing. She hasn’t learned her lesson from 2008. It was obvious why obama won. Which again, proves she will make a terrible president.
They don’t showcase her. The media speaks for her. She can’t be seen or heard or she loses votes.
If Hillary’s mishandling of classified information and deleting 30,000 emails doesn’t phase him, he’s really not too bright. Peter Thiel is the smart one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.