Skip to comments.Tweet: Comey says no evidence server was breached; holding Guccifer for breaching
Posted on 07/06/2016 7:34:08 AM PDT by ctdonath2
- @FBI director Comey says there is no evidence Hillary's server was breached, as he holds Guccifer in jail for breaching her server.
will the statute of limitations run out before Trump is sworn in?
He was the smoking gun, they had to wrap him up tight, so as not to compromise the fix.
If Hillary didn’t do anything wrong, why even make the point she acted recklessly?
And if she did, intent doesn’t matter for the purposes of securing a conviction in court.
After all, lots of people who break the law claim they had good intentions or they didn’t mean to do it.
Its rightly rejected as a defense... except for Hillary Clinton.
Comey also catalogued a series of missteps by Clinton, noting that there was no 24-hour security on her unusual private server, that she used the account when overseas and at risk of intrusion, and that people she communicated with got hacked.
I think he is actually being held for hacking into other machines
He hacked Sid Vicious and got his email string with Hillary.
Comeys conscience got the better of him.
From the indictment:
“From December 2012 to January 2014, Guccifer hacked into the email and social media accounts of high-profile victims, including a family member of two former U.S. presidents, a former U.S. Cabinet member, a former member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and a former presidential advisor. After gaining unauthorized access to their email and social media accounts, Guccifer publicly released his victims’ private email correspondence, medical and financial information, and personal photographs. The indictment also alleges that in July and August 2013, Guccifer impersonated a victim after compromising the victim’s account.”
The formal advisor I believe is Sid Blumenthol.
However there was a Hillary connection and apparently he even read some of Hillarys emails and made the comment that it was boring political discussions (paraphrasing).
Her email was hacked. No doubt about it. IMO.
What he says and what he did may be two different things. I want to see the money first.
Hacking the server would have been easy.
Could someone explain to me what evidence there would be of such a breach?
A hack in some cases leaves behind a clear alteration, in some cases a piece of “I was here” graffiti; in some cases an alteration that invalidates the proper users credentials so he/she cannot use the thing any more.
But if the intrusion is a read only, which would be the smart way to hack a computer you wanted not only to spy on but to be able to spy on in the future, then there would be no residual signs of a hack. Hence there would be no evidence.
Or am I mistaken?
Agreed. Especially when you can buy the best hackers money can buy and billions of dollars and US national security were involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.