Posted on 07/05/2016 2:24:40 PM PDT by PROCON
Tar and feather these holes and run them out of town.
“They will use privileged minorities to be in the vanguard of these efforts”
My evening news now starts off with Hillary commercial featuring a child or children.
With the D.o.J. defecating directly on the noses of John Q. and Jane Q. Public, of course, the gun grabbers have to get back into it, more quickly than ever.
Why???
The cognizant, thinking populace’s fuse has been lit, and they know their time is short, in one definition or another.
Another possibility is to leave the decision to the firearms seller.
no criminal block justified
no mental illness block justified
Sale legally allowed
FBI/AG recommendation: no
a. married to Saudi woman who spent three months in Syria in 2015
b. read these webpages with associated translated quotes in 2016:
...
Expect to be sued if something bad happens as a result of the requested sale since it carries a negative recommendation.
Obama controls the Supreme Court now.
Comprehensive Immigration Reform is always about amnesty.
Common sense gun control is always about steps toward registration.
“but the demoRATS dont want due process”
And too damned many Repubs are the same.
Ain’t no way we are giving up our guns with a government this corrupt. We would rather shot every bullet we have.
Indeed, if you count the 505 accidental gun deaths, and if they were all reported on in the media, it would seem like a real outbreak, someone dying more than once per day.
So I tried to explain that although the per capita gun accident deaths are about 2 times the US over Canada, that the number 505 is tiny. Something like 30,000 are killed in car deaths, and another 30,000 (or so) in falling accidents.
Am I going about the argument the right way?
Am I going about the argument the right way?
Yes you are but cars, to a liberal, aren't as evil as guns. Those dastardly guns have a mind of their own when it comes to killing innocents, donchaknow.
Liberals have already made their minds up, obediently repeating the talking points they've heard.
As the government aggregates more and more powers not delegated to it in the constitution, they seek simultaneously to disarm the populace.
Coincidence?
No.
The problem of entering a debate with a fool is after a couple minutes, nobody can tell you apart.
Partly.
Tell them that a lot of U.S. citizens would rather shoot a Congressman or his staff than give up the Second Amendment.
Tell them many Americans are tired of all the infringements on the Second Amendment.
Tell them if Canada had the same level of the same minorities that the U.S. has, they would have the same problems, and guns are not the cause.
You talkin about "their" side, or "ours"? I've been to this point for a long time. And after today's lawlessness, I feel even less inclined to follow their BS rules.
if the racist “CBC” really gave a rats=ass-damn about black Americans, they’d demand the repeal of all laws and regulations ... so that good honest black American citizens can easily go out and acquire what they may need to defend themselves and other innocent people
from the criminals and Moslem terrorist gangsters that the “CBC” appears to be working for now....
They say they want to prevent suspected terrorists from getting firearms. And they would be the ones to define who is a terrorist. Won’t be muslims or nutcases.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.