Posted on 07/05/2016 11:03:20 AM PDT by walford
FBI Director James Comey shed new light on Hillary Clintons private email setup when he announced Tuesday that the FBI would not recommend charges against the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. Here are some of the new details revealed by Comey.
113 emails were classified at the time they were sent
Both Clintons presidential campaign and the State Department have repeatedly insisted that none of the approximately 2,000 emails now considered classified was deemed sensitive at the time.
But Comey on Tuesday said that wasnt quite the case.
In fact, federal agencies have claimed that 113 emails in more than 50 chains contained sensitive information at the time they were sent or received by her private setup, which she kept at her home in New York. Of those, eight chains contained information considered top secret, the highest level of classification.
Three of the sensitive emails were discovered among the thousands the former secretary of State claimed were purely personal in nature and which she deleted before giving her servers to the FBI last year.
An undisclosed very small number of messages bore markings indicating the presence of classified information, he said, without divulging additional details.
Thousands of work emails were deleted
Clinton has previously framed the decision to delete half of her machines cache of approximately 60,000 messages as an effort to avoid letting her private life become public.
I chose not to keep my private personal emails emails about planning Chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends as well as yoga routines, family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes, she said in March 2015 in a widely scrutinized press conference at the United Nations.
But FBI investigators uncovered several thousand work-related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to the State Department, Comey said on Tuesday.
The bureau found traces of those emails on machines connected to the private clintonemail.com domain, as well as fragments from decommissioned servers and from the email accounts of people who had communicated with her.
No official emails were intentionally deleted
None of the work-related messages was intentionally deleted from Clintons machine as part of an effort to evade federal laws, Comey said on Tuesday.
We found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them, he said. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed.
Both government systems and commercial services such as Yahoo or Gmail routinely archive old emails. But Clintons bespoke setup did not include that feature, Comey said.
While deciding which emails to preserve and which to delete, Clintons lawyers also used a search tool and did not go through the emails one by one, as officials from the FBI did as part of their investigation. In doing so, they may have accidentally overlooked some emails that should have been sent to the government.
So it is not surprising that we discovered emails that were not on Secretary Clintons system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 emails to the State Department, Comey said.
There were likely more work-related emails that will never be recovered
The FBI could not recover all of the emails that Clinton deleted, so theres a good chance that other official messages will be lost forever.
It is also likely that there are other work-related emails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, Comey said.
Those messages, he added, are likely now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
Clinton used more than one server and multiple mobile devices
The public narrative about Clintons setup is that she used a single server throughout her tenure at the State Department, which was given to the FBI as part of its investigation last year.
But the reality is somewhat more complicated. In fact, Clinton changed machines when older ones became out of date, leaving a trail of out-of-order servers behind her.
Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain, Comey revealed on Tuesday. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored and decommissioned in various ways.
Old servers, such as one that was decommissioned in 2013, contained email fragments in the unused slack space that investigators combed to try to resurrect some of the old messages.
It's possible she was hacked
FBI officials did not uncover any evidence that Clintons private setup may have been hacked by foreigners, terrorists, activists or anyone else.
But that doesnt mean it didnt happen, according to the head of the FBI.
Hackers have targeted people she communicated with, such as longtime confidant Sidney Blumenthal, and her arrangement was relatively well-known and readily apparent, Comey said.
It is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clintons personal email account, he said.
Anyone else might have faced administrative punishments
Clinton was let off the hook in the eyes of the law, but the FBI doesnt want to send a message that her behavior was OK.
There was evidence of potential violations of laws against handling classified information, Comey said.
Just not enough to bring charges.
Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case, he told reporters.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences, Comey added. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.
But that is not what we are deciding now.
Will the FBI give a President Hillary a high security clearance?
Hillary's case, the logs were destroyed.
Hillary's IT pros were not professional enough to do a complete “data wipe” that was fully beyond the forensic recovery capabilities of the FBI.
Reading between the lines, the server data storage was intentionally erased but not so through of a job that the FBI could not recover some data fragment pieces of the puzzle.
It was in her freaking BATHROOM. How can this be sold to the public as merely ‘careless’ - instead of OBSTRUCTION?
OK - so 'the law' for Washington Insiders is different than 'the law' for the rest of us?
In short, if any of the little people try this they'll be fried by the FBI... Unlike the crooks who run DC - - we won't be able to say 'we're sorry' or that 'we wouldn't do it again'. That's for the liars, crooks and criminals who run the country. And the lowlifes who make their lives and crimes easier by ignoring them.
To all you FBI agents who shill for the Southern Poverty Law Center? Shill to trash political enemies of Democrats? Shill to turn the country into a banana republica? Go eff yourselves.
+100
So I take it that Huma, Cheryl Mills, Patrick Kennedy and any other helpers are all off the hook as well. No one broke any law. Double dipping on salary is good too.
Obama can’t pardon her for crimes she hasn’t been convicted.
Have you seen the presidential limousine lately? Designed to protect a despot.
From the news story: Lazar, 44, did not give any proof to back up his claim and would not provide copies of the emails he said he downloaded from the Clinton server.
IMO, not credible, I would need some proof that he got in, not just his claim.
Note my dissent from your accusation: (Reply #29 at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3445159/posts
he won’t stop Putin....he probably “donated” money to the Clinton Crime Family Slush Fund!!
She is actually more guilty of violations than we thought. Clearly she can get away with murder.
Why does the investigating agency decide there isn’t enough evidence to prosecute? It sounds like there is evidence of criminal conduct, why isn’t it presented to a prosecutor to allow the prosecutor to decide I think this was done to allow the media to make Clinton look innocent. If the FBI had sent the evidence to a prosecutor who then decided not to prosecute, it would have created a very ugly situation in which Obama’s Justice Department appeared to defend Hillary. Our government is a corrupt joke.
18 USC § 793
18 USC § 798
18 USC § 1924
18 USC § 2071
36 CFR § 1236.22
decide(.)
One other possibility, and it’s just a possibility: HRC has made a deal to bring health issues to light (or, if necessary, fake them) and use them as a reason to withdraw from the race some time in the next two weeks, in return for skating on everything. Bill’s meeting with Lynch was to establish the time line, with the quashing of indictments coming first, then the stepping down in favor of Biden and/or Warren, which would explain why Obama was so quick to schedule a campaign stop with Hillary, so that he looks like he didn’t quash the indictments, nor caused HRC to quit.
This would actually be the worst possible scenario, because Hillary would skate, Obama would get his de facto third term, and Trump’s loss to Biden and/or Warren would be the end of the possibility of cleaning house in the GOP.
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized (trunc) (2015)
FBI ^ | 7-29-15 | FBI
Posted on 7/5/2016, 10:12:45 AM by dynachrome
SACRAMENTO, CABryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom, pleaded guilty today to unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials,
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman immediately sentenced Nishimura to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. Nishimura was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance and to never again seek such a clearance.
Nishimura was a Naval reservist deployed in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. In his role as a Regional Engineer for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Nishimura had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers.
Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan and, ultimately, carried those materials back to the United States at the end of his deployment. In the United States, Nishimura continued to maintain the information on unclassified systems in unauthorized locations, and copied the materials onto at least one additional unauthorized and unclassified system.
Nishimuras actions came to light in early 2012, when he admitted to Naval personnel that he had handled classified materials inappropriately. Nishimura later admitted that, , he destroyed a large quantity of classified materials he had maintained in his home. Despite that, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched Nishimuras home in May 2012, agents recovered numerous classified materials in digital and hard copy forms. The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
This case was the product of an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Jean M. Hobler prosecuted the case.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3446483/posts
I would suggest here that 113 isn’t the number of actual classified emails but is rather a code for the corruption taking place, the significance of, the meaning of and the reason behind the corruption. Believe the code signifies targeting of conservatives under Obama’s regime among other meanings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.