Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: walford

Why does the investigating agency decide there isn’t enough evidence to prosecute? It sounds like there is evidence of criminal conduct, why isn’t it presented to a prosecutor to allow the prosecutor to decide I think this was done to allow the media to make Clinton look innocent. If the FBI had sent the evidence to a prosecutor who then decided not to prosecute, it would have created a very ugly situation in which Obama’s Justice Department appeared to defend Hillary. Our government is a corrupt joke.


55 posted on 07/05/2016 11:50:30 AM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yogafist

decide(.)


57 posted on 07/05/2016 11:51:21 AM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Yogafist

Being political animals, maybe no prosecutor in the nation would indict, but I’d bet that every grand jury would.


117 posted on 07/06/2016 2:56:00 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson