Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Officials can't use private email accounts to evade records laws
The Hill ^ | July 5, 2016 - Banana Republic Day | Megan R. Wilson

Posted on 07/05/2016 9:34:34 AM PDT by kiryandil

Federal officials may not use private email accounts to get around public records laws, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned a lower court decision in which judges dismissed claims from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank that attempted to obtain correspondence from a top White House official through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) said it did not need to search for or turn over records held by the head of the OSTP on a private email account as part of the open records request.

In addition to official White House email, John Holdren, the director of the OSTP, also sent and received emails from a domain at the Woods Hole Research Center.

Throughout the case, the government argued that “[d]ocuments on a nongovernmental email server are outside the possession or control of federal agencies, and thus beyond the scope of FOIA.”...

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails; ruleofforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
So, whatever, Federal Judge David Sentelle...
1 posted on 07/05/2016 9:34:35 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Unless your name is Clinton. Then you can do whatever you damn well please.


2 posted on 07/05/2016 9:36:29 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Sure. The laws only apply to ordinary citizens. They do not apply to the privileged elite, such as hillary.


3 posted on 07/05/2016 9:36:55 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Islam, rather than a religion, is primarily a totalitarian political ideology aiming for world domin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Tell it to the FBI, judge.


4 posted on 07/05/2016 9:38:43 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Trump - because this Constitutional Republic is already undone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Actually not only can they...they have


5 posted on 07/05/2016 9:39:13 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Sure judge. We all know that the law only apply to little people.


6 posted on 07/05/2016 9:39:40 AM PDT by seawolf101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

[ Court: Officials can’t use private email accounts to evade records laws ]

Hahahahahahahaha.

Joke’s on us, again.

They made this ruling >>>after<<< Hillary gets set free by Comey and Co. so they can point at it and claim she was grandfathered-in earlier.


7 posted on 07/05/2016 9:40:44 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

The timing of this could not be more perfect...


8 posted on 07/05/2016 9:40:57 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Sorry, judge, you’ve been overruled........................


9 posted on 07/05/2016 9:41:22 AM PDT by Red Badger (Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

[The timing of this could not be more perfect...]

That’s why it’s no accident. As you are saying.


10 posted on 07/05/2016 9:42:04 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
The laws only apply to ordinary citizens. They do not apply to the privileged elite, such as hillary.
Nor do they apply to black panthers, rioters, BLM, etc ...
11 posted on 07/05/2016 9:42:29 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

As Hillary is fond of saying, “what difference does it make?”

None in her case.


12 posted on 07/05/2016 9:43:14 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Also discussed at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3446467/posts


13 posted on 07/05/2016 9:43:48 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yep. Laws are for the little people, the serfs who work for the esteemed and privileged elites. There can be no question that we have a two tiered legal system in this country. Its good to be royalty.


14 posted on 07/05/2016 9:46:32 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Wake the f*ck up!

That’s always been true in this country - if you’re powerful, rich and have the right connections, you walk.

If you don’t, good luck.


15 posted on 07/05/2016 9:51:27 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Gee, So I guess there IS a prosecutor who will bring these charges.


16 posted on 07/05/2016 10:02:53 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Unless you’re Hillary.


17 posted on 07/05/2016 10:04:23 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Yeah, I saw that - but it hasn’t got the correct title [it’s the same article]. :)


18 posted on 07/05/2016 10:06:27 AM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

No sweat on the dupe, and I noted the title difference. Cross linked each to the other just for reference, for others.


19 posted on 07/05/2016 10:10:37 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
How moral are laws that are only selectively enforced, and rarely against the very people who pass them and who are elected and employed to enforce them?

Growing up we learned to take pride in the ideals that America was a nation of laws, not men, and that all citizens are equal under the law.

Now we find America is no longer a nation of laws.
It has become a nation of crooked politicians and crooked bureaucrats.

Politicians pass laws that are meant to apply only against the little people, and bureaucrats enforce laws arbitrarily to suit a political agenda.


20 posted on 07/05/2016 10:11:56 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson