Posted on 06/30/2016 12:30:48 PM PDT by Sybeck1
For his own sake and the country's, the conservative stalwart should stand behind Trump
Aside from saying on Monday that he isnt bothered one way or the other about being given a speaking slot at the GOP convention, Ted Cruz has been noticeably absent from the public eye since exiting the 2016 contest. One would think that a committed constitutionalist like Cruz would be doing everything he can to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming president. But even if Cruz isnt willing to stand side-by-side with Trump to that end, he should at least be willing to do so for his own self-interest.
The fact is that while Cruz may worry that associating with Trump could damage his doctrinaire conservative brand in the eyes of ideological die-hards and those evangelicals hitherto resistant to Trumps apparent charms, the alternative should Clinton win being cast as one of those who stood by and did nothing as Clinton waltzed into the White House could be much worse.
If Cruzs authentic conservative brand is hurt by association with Trump, it will be hurt just as much if not more by association with the Jonah Goldbergs and the Bill Kristols of the world.
Theres also the basic fact of human nature that no one likes a sore loser, and being seen as one can be a significant handicap in the political world. Hillary Clintons belated though relatively graceful acquiescence to Obamas nomination in 2008 likely secured her position as secretary of state, while Richard Nixons embittered exit from the 1962 California gubernatorial election almost cost him his entire political career.
Blaming biased media coverage in large part for his loss to Democratic Gov. Pat Brown, Nixon lashed out at reporters. You dont have Nixon to kick around any more, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference, he said.
Indeed, were it not for an outrageously biased anti-Nixon documentary which aired on ABC the week after the election so biased in fact that it managed to garner Nixon national sympathy his political career would likely have been over.
But Nixon is that rare exception that proves the political rule, and if enough of the conservative base considers even for a moment that Cruzs refusal to stand publicly with Trump against Clinton was motivated by ill feeling toward Trump, he may lose a significant amount of credibility.
Related Content
PoliZette The Case for a Cruz-Trump Coalition The ugly battle between the populist front-runners provides Rubio an opening to win it all Cruz could also be of great help to Trump's electoral efforts. If Trump loses, it will likely be largely the result of a concerted and biased media campaign, as was the case for Mitt Romney in 2012. But as he proved during the GOP primaries, Cruz is one of the most effective critics of media bias, far more so than Trump, who often appears personal and petty.
Moreover, forming a new relationship with Trump could also be strategically advantageous for Cruz. That Cruz is massively unpopular among his fellow senators on both sides of the aisle is a well known fact. "I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life," former GOP Speaker of the House John Boehner said.
Lindsey Graham famously noted that if "you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you." Indeed, to call Cruz unpopular may be an understatement. If Trump should win in November, a repaired, working relationship with the business mogul would offer Cruz a level of clout in the Senate which for him is otherwise unattainable.
Regardless of any desire Cruz may have to run again in 2020, he should get involved in the 2016 contest now. The potential benefits both for himself and the country seem to far outweigh the potential disadvantages.
IF YOU LIKE THIS, READThe Hypocrites Have Left the Building
Ride daddy, ride.
Check out her Twitter feed. She’s prolific with her Trump hate tweets.....
https://twitter.com/amandacarpenter
Or trying to organize a Stryper reunion tour.
I’m puzzled as to why people with deep animosity toward Ted Cruz want him supporting their candidate. I’m puzzled as to why people who think their candidate is all that plus a cheezburger think Ted Cruz’s support is relevant.
He’s pretty publicly holding Senate hearings, not that hard to figure out where he is.
Cruz, Jeb, Kasich, and Rubio
****************************
At the start of the primaries I knew Yeb!, Kasuck and Amnesty Boy were working for the Cheap Labor Express.
I thought Ted Cruz was on the side of the citizens.
I thought wrong, apparently.
Maybe he could do a Stryper campaign tour for Trump? And serial kill Clinton supporters in each city.
That’s cause Trump destroyed her idol. It’s plain to see these #nevertrumpers want Donald to lose so Teddy can run again in 2020.
Cruz is NOT relevant. Point is he took a pledge to support the nominee. Cruz is a pretend conservative, has a sense of entitlement equal to a liberal. There does seem to be an epidemic of entitlement fever circling God’s green earth.
LOL - it would make a great movie.
Maybe Val Kilmer could play Cruz.
TYG.
Too old.
They can fix that with CGI. Who else would play him?
Good question. I’m not really informed about actors under 50. Maybe my teenagers would have suggestions if they were here.
Are they adjourned like the House?
That was Trump’s fraud Enquirer buddy who made that one up.
see my 21
hehehehe
Just returned from Canada. I did not see him there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.