Posted on 06/27/2016 4:41:20 PM PDT by wildbill
Mysterious Collapse of a Great Ancient Empire. From his capital, Hattusa, in central Anatolia, the last-known Hittite king, Suppiluliuma II (1207 B.C.-?), ruled over a people who had once built a great empireone of the superpowers (along with Egypt, Mittani, Babylon and Assyria) of the Late Bronze Age. The Kingdom of the Hittites, called Hatti, had stretched across the face of Anatolia and northern Syria, from the Aegean in the west to the Euphrates in the east. But now those days were gone, and the royal capital was about to be destroyed forever by invasion and fire.
(Excerpt) Read more at biblicalarchaeology.org ...
Good article on Hittite empire’s collapse for GGG
Constant wars, royal family infighting, need for manpower for farming, need for manpower for military battles. Toss in some illnesses and no anti-biotics and add a drought and you have got a collapse of a civilization. And of course a few pirates lurking nearby with lots of eager bad guys waiting to seize power. Gee, about the same story every time.
Interesting!
Obviously fell because of globull warming!......
Trevor Bryce is one of the leading experts on the Hittites alive today.
Thanks wildbill.One of *those* topics, bigtime.
[snip] The question is whether those tree-ring centuries are linked with post-Hittite cultures (as the conventional chronology would have it) or with those of the Hittite Empire (as our model predicts). If Hittite buildings destroyed at the very end of the Late Bronze Age were to be found exclusively with timbers dating from considerably before 1200 BC, then our theory would be in trouble... We stress the word exclusively here, because as with radiocarbon dating there is an 'old wood' problem in tree-ring dating. Dendrochronology can rarely give us a date when a particular piece of wood was used; even less often will it give a date for an archaeological destruction. Dendrochronology gives us the dates when tree rings grew, so one has to be very careful about using it to date archaeological levels... Only the results from one Hittite site have been formally published, those from Tille Höyük on the Euphrates. These were striking. The construction of the last phase of the Tille Höyük Gateway is dated to 1101 + 1 BC, with its use lying in the 11th century BC. Yet Tille Höyük was an Imperial Hittite outpost, which on the conventional chronology would have been constructed about 1300 BC, and destroyed c. 1190 BC. The dendro-date is clearly impossible for the conventional chronology. Furthermore, the best fit for this sample (using the normal T-score statistical test) is actually in 942 + 1 BC (James et al. 1998, 41, n. 10)! An extra statistical test had to be introduced to avoid this awkward conclusion. Kuniholm does indeed have tree-rings for those "nasty centuries". Nastily for the conventional chronology, at Tille Höyük they are associated with the remains of an Empire which was supposed to have fallen at least a century earlier. [/snip]
|
http://www.varchive.org/tac/dakhamun.htm
[snip] In the course of the brief reign of Ramses I (Necho I), Tirhaka, who had fought against Sennacherib, Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal, died at his capital of Napata. In Assurbanipal’s words, “The night of death overtook him.” He left behind, widowed, his chief wife Duk-hat-amun, but no sons — a son and another wife had been captured years earlier by Esarhaddon in Memphis and deported to Assyria. The succession to the Ethiopian throne would pass through Duk-hat-amun if she could find a husband of royal blood; if not, Tirhaka’s nephew, Tandamane, was next in the line of succession. [/snip]
Thanks wildbill.
Unfortunately the Hittites didn’t have the fall of the Hittites to learn from. What’s our excuse?
The Smithsonian had an special on the Hittites hosted by Jeremy Irons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFyxR1tSeY0
Saw it. An unusually good dramatic recreation of people and events.
Agree.
So was he a real Hittite or did he just identify as one to impress Bathsheba?
He was part of a refugee group of Hittites that fled their homeland due to a band of killers led by a mysterious leader known as Black Bart.
The legend of Black Bart survives is oral tradition and stories until this very day.
The term Hittite was lifted from the Old Testament to tag the so-called “forgotten empire” upon its discovery. But I’m sure you knew that. :’)
In the Septuagint Uriah the Hittite is Ourias Chettaios. I think the term Hittite used of Bronze Age Asia Minor is just the English rendition of the name based on Hatti (an earlier people who spoke an unrelated non-Indo-European language before the Hittites of the 2nd millennium BC showed up).
Nope. The OT term was already being discussed as an historic people before the discovery of the so-called “forgotten empire”, the capital of which wasn’t discovered until late in the 19th c. The term Hatti is now used to refer to non-Hittites, in part due to the circa 1930s cracking of the cuneiform archive (by Emil Forrer I believe) which found NO trace of any language by that name (Hattish, Hittite, etc) even though the names had been clumsily applied.
Most of the problems stem from the fact that the conventional pseudochronology is dead wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hittites#Biblical_background
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.