Posted on 06/27/2016 10:11:39 AM PDT by Javeth
When the horserace is expanded to four candidates — including Libertarian Gary Johnson and the Green Party's Jill Stein — Clinton gets support from 39 percent of voters, Trump gets 38 percent, Johnson 10 percent and Stein 6 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
“Powerful forces are conspiring to depress support for Trump.”
Precisely.
A muslim fanatic slaughters 50 Americans, but it becomes a gun control issue.
Great Britain rejects Euro-statism, but it plays well for Hitlery in the polls.
The (bedwetting) rats and their allied RsAT are frantically trying to maintain control over the narrative with their old reliables, “political science” and “Some say ...”
How can that be? Trump has no money, and there’s nothing on tv but anti Trump! I mean, 24/7 ANTI TRUMP,
Nope, it's going to be a landslide, for Trump.
I know. I was being sarcastic. If course they oversample. They always oversample.
It goes to figure. Republicans have jobs and are busy. I got a call for some radio station survey last week. I asked how long it would take and was told 15 minutes.
Nope, too long. Plus, they wouldn’t like my answers. Talk radio, classic 70’s station and occasionally the local Christian station, that’s it.
These CBS polls, from yesterday, in FL, NC, CO and WI are the best news Trump has gotten so far. These battleground polls show how close the race really is.The WI and CO are great news...these all are in play or better. The stage could be set.
I’ve spent alot of time on www.270towin.com and am finding some interesting information. In each of these 4 swing states except NC which he lost in 2012, Obama won each both years, 2008 and 2012. The interesting note is that he lost ground in each state, winning but with a smaller margin from 2008 to 2012. In Fl, AZ, CO, WI, NC, NV, NM, OH, PA, NH, and VA he lost voter % in 2012, in all cases by a considerable amount, even up to 4%. That’s 11 states that Trump can win in that are already giving up Obama/Clinton voters.
The Trump campaign is pushing hard for donations; I love it; just got an email from Paul Manafort and got the text link on my cell to www.lyingcrookedhillary.com, both with big pushes for money. Up until last this past week, Trump has not asked for any money in any organised way. I think we owe it to him for where he has gotten us so far. We are going up against a $2 billion campaign machine, with another $1 billion worth of MSM reporting help.
The odd thing is that while many of the bigger donors have not stepped up yet or are finding excuses not to, once they see that we can deliver a serious punch up in dollars, they will jump on the bandwagon. Better late than never!
Imagine if Team Trump can find a way for 15 million supporters to donate an average of $50.00 each. That’s $750,000,000.00!! It’s not that his supporters have given that much through the primaries and to date in the general; maybe $20-25 million total from small donors. Bernie Sanders raised over $185 million from small donors. It should not be a stretch for us to get to $200-250 million or more.
My wife and me just started to go through our garage and storage closets to find items we don’t need and we are going to put them all on Craigslist. We already have enough small items that we will never use to easily sell for $150.00 or more over the next 2 weeks. That would put us over $300 donated so far.
And we have decided to volunteer in Florida to work the phones. We live on a tight budget for sure, and I’m guessing many of you are in a better financial position to match what we are doing. If not then do what you can. If you haven’t donated yet, now is the time! If you think this election will be close, then let’s put Trump over the top. If you think he will win, let’s make it a big victory, so he can pummel the Rino’s in DC.
Let’s do this !!!
....every week it’s the same BS...ILL CALL TRUMP UP BY 5
JMHo
Today on radio, Roger Stone said that the polls that show Trump and Hillary neck and neck are bogus, and the purpose is to get people used to that “neck-and-neck” paradigm because they’re planning to steal the election from Trump and they don’t want it to be so obvious.
It’s very obviously true IMO.
I’ll take it. Lincoln won in 1860 with 39.6% and Clinton won in 1992 with 43.0%.
Groups like True the vote WILL be all over this election, EVERYONE KNOWS what is at stake!!!! People WILL be at their polling places in droves and NOW we have Twitter word will be out faster than you can blink an eye!!!! Trump supporters are rabid supporters the bikers, tattoo artists, construction workers, these folks are going to VOLT Trump into the White House MARK MY WORDS AMERICA FIRST!!!! MAGA!!!!!
Can’t be true - we’ve been told by the msm that The Donald has fallen far, far behind.
If Trump was +10, he'd be "peaking too soon" and if he were -10 then it would be "all over". It doesn't matter if he's up big, down big or somewhere in-between. People will come here to fret and whine and complain.
“Billary will screw up big time by having a temper tantrum on national TeeVee”
Funny you should say that...I noticed the past few days watching her when she is not talking, she has a nasty look on her face, like she is getting ready to tear into someone. The other day when she spoke the word “sigh” that was on the teleprompter showed us something is wrong with her. Either she is sleep deprived or hungover, something is up. Today she had the nasty look on again and her face looked like crap, all drawn out and pasty white.
Maybe her campaign has internal polling that shows a much different race than the MSM is trying to sell us on. If that’s the case she must be hell on wheels to be around, because of course none of the campaign problems could be HER, it must be someone else’s fault. And then there is EmailGate...could be she is spending all her available off the campaign time meeting with lawyers...could be the news is not good:)
Lots of undecideds.
Any topic with the word poll in it should be temporarily banned until after the election.
Explains why media is basically ignoring Johnson and Stein. Remember 1992 and Perot? Media loved the guy because he was taking votes from Bush Sr. How about John Anderson in 1980? Media assumed because he was a Republican he would take votes from Reagan so they showered him with coverage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.