Posted on 06/23/2016 1:41:27 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
“If I had my way, sporting guns would be strictly regulated, the rest would be confiscated” ~ Nancy Pelosi
Chuck Schumer : “We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy! We’re going to beat guns into submission!”
The first quote is by Democrat Nancy Pelosi, the second ...by Democrat Chuck Schumer. If you asked either politician today they would (in public) proudly tell you all … ALL they want is a few simple common sense gun control laws…you know… for the children.
Hillary Clinton isn’t any better, she admits to wanting to ban all semi-automatic weapons. But then in the next breath is REALLY only interested in common sense gun safety … more of the kind that is supposed to keep children safe.
Should the vote go in their favor next year Schumer will lead the Senate, Pelosi the House and Hillary would sit in the Oval office. Then just like CA, New Jersey or other anti-gun states there will never be enough gun control. It is not about the changes they might bring in 2016, it is 2017, 2018 and 2019…etc. As every year we would lose more of our rights to “protect children”.
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
Collins' bill is so bad even the ACLU opposes it.
keep fighting folks
Because we know the Left has absolutely NO common sense. Who are they kidding?
Diane Feinstein was direct to the point on grabbing your guns. She didnt parse words.
“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban picking up every one of them...Mr. and Mrs. America turn ‘em all in I would have done it. I could not do it. The votes were not there.”
February 5th, 1995. Diane Feinstein on 60 Minutes
If the democrats take congress and Hillary takes the white house the republicans might as well curl up in one big fetal position and cry for the rest of their miserable cowardly lives.
Hey DiFi, molon labe, beotch.
I cringe whenever they talk about “common sense.”
What they mean is their plan and anything else is unreasonable.
In addition. all this talk about mental health checks. . .recall these are the same people that include on health care history questionnaires a question about home ownership of firearms.
Moreover, imagine the “logic” of the left:
“You WANT a firearm. . .you must be nuts—DENIED!, but, if you don’t want a firearm you must be sane.”
Easy to imagine. . .
If Cankles is elected the Repulicans will be right there kissing her ass just like they have been with Barry.
I’m going to do a rant, it might get me kicked off here, but you know sometimes you just have to say what you feel:
We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy! We’re going to beat guns into submission!”
*****************************************************
Let me tell you something Chucky Cheesey, the NRA is the biggest, most powerful pack there is, there are a lot more of us than there are of you hillbilly hicks that New York and California idiots have put into office, and that office seat your sitting in, DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU, IT BELONGS TO US!!! The American Voter...we PAY you to do work for US, not the other way around, so you take your B.S. and march right back to the tunnels of New York and the gay streets of California and shove it all up your Butts!!!!!!
They want to take away our rights for our own good.
Cuz we’re morons yup and morons don’t deserve to be a free people.
It seems that no public figure has the guts to speak about one of the major flaws in the No-Fly No-Guns proposals.
The federal government is now in the hands of America’s enemies.
If the federal government is given (or seizes) the right to refuse gun purchases by those on the No-Fly list the list will be used as a political weapon.
It will be stripped of muslims, militant blacks and other enemies and loaded down with the names of American citizen patriots, white Christians, militia, veterans, known conservatives, preppers and other innocent Americans.
Heck, knowing how this government works we could even expect the list to include the names of all Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts! after all - they recite the Pledge of Allegiance at their meetings.
That should say “OVERrun a country”
The 2nd Amendment as written along with the 46th Federalist Paper is common sense and based upon truths that are transcendent with the realities of human nature. All liberal views on the 2nd Amendment are anathema against the Constitution therefore that makes them ‘domestic enemies” of the Constitution and also the nation. In this light they not only have to legally opposed but also to be considered hostile enemies to the country where a legitimate use of military force is warranted to prevent their activities.
Cause we’ve been watching Democrats long enough to know that they don’t HAVE any common sense.
Liberals brand themselves as smart, love, tolerance. Those who disagree are stupid, haters, bigots, evil. The “common sense” meme is simply another play on the “smart”. All the smart sane reasonable people agree with us, suggestion those who don’t are ignorant or stupid.
I’ve seen a new meme from the left - let’s be civil!
Yet their definition of civility is “don’t disagree with me”.
It is a new variation of your speech is hate speech, ban hate speech, yeah, no one disagrees with me!
It is just another play on be nice, you evil conservative, by shutting up.
Better not be Schumer’s nose under my tent! I’ll do him such an injury...
So many politicians funerals are on my bucket list.Ted Kennedy’s was the best so far.
Nelson “Pete” Shields told how they were going to take your guns back in 1976. First it was just HANDGUNS, now it is also RIFLES and SHOTGUNS..
Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.
“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest.
Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.
So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — TOTAL CONTROL of handguns in the United States — is going to take time.
My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — TOTALLY ILLEGAL.”
-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58
“Yes, I’m for an outright ban [on handguns].”
-Pete Shields, Chairman emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc., 60 Minutes interview
HCI, around 1984, came out in favor of a ban on semi-auto rifles and shotguns.
Addendum. I am always finding something new Here is something from around 1940 Europe. A good reason to oppose any form of registration.
The Democrat dream for the USA!
From Berlin on January 6th the German official radio broadcast—
”The German military commander for Belgium and Northern France announced yesterday that the population would be given a last opportunity to surrender firearms without penalty up to January 20th and after that date anyone found in possession of arms would be executed.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.