Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1

That does seem to represent a lot of firepower. I’d be interested to know what they intended for these weapons, and if they’re authorized to own them.


38 posted on 06/21/2016 9:25:36 AM PDT by Theo (No tagline for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Theo

“That does seem to represent a lot of firepower.”

Not particularly. A shotgun, a semi-auto rifle and a few handguns. That looks like a light day at the range for a lot of guys.


72 posted on 06/21/2016 10:47:08 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (This posting is a microaggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Theo
I’d be interested to know what they intended for these weapons, and if they’re authorized to own them.

Wrong thinking. The second amendment is all the authorization they need.

If you should not be authorized to be armed, you should not be running around loose.

74 posted on 06/21/2016 10:53:38 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Theo

“I’d be interested to know what they intended for these weapons, and if they’re authorized to own them.”

Since WHEN does a free American have to be AUTHORIZED to possess firearms???? What jurisdiction??? NOT TEXAS.


84 posted on 06/21/2016 11:19:37 AM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson