Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shanghai Dan
> Sorry, that's incorrect. Please see this for proof otherwise: ... That's a 1997, 266 MHz Pentium II running Windows 7 Ultimate. Yes, it probably is quite slow - but it will run - and run with 96 MB of RAM at that.

Point taken. I guess I should have more accurately phrased my comment as "Windows 7 won't run worth a crap on a Pentium-II" rather than "Windows 7 won't run on a Pentium-II" (the latter implies "at all").

I have found that Microsoft is generally very cautious about their [minimum] System Requirements, which is where the 1GHz CPU "requirement" comes from.

Speaking of "it probably is quite slow", back in 1999 I ran Windows 95 on a 1988-vintage 30MHz 486 with 8MB of RAM. It took ages to do anything, and you could only load one application at a time. It was nearly f**king useless, practically, but it proved the same point.

33 posted on 06/16/2016 1:12:00 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

Yep! Microsoft generally obsoletes hardware VERY slowly, and supports things as long as possible. I still have some DOS programs I wrote back in the late 80s that run in a console on Windows 10! A 30 year old program still running...

Yes, I could rewrite it - but why? It still works, still processes data. No need to recreate things.

That’s the biggest strength that Microsoft has - it supports programs and hardware well beyond what most companies and people would expect. That is the ultimate lock-in; support your customers with whatever they’re using for as long as they like.


40 posted on 06/16/2016 8:10:02 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson