Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald J. Trump Statement Regarding Trump University
Donald J. Trump ^ | 6-7-2016 | Donald J. Trump

Posted on 06/07/2016 1:10:54 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather

It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial.

Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report.

Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example:

(Excerpt) Read more at donaldjtrump.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: judge; laraza; larazajudge; statement; trump; trumpu; trumpuniversity; university
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Buckeye McFrog

I’d posit that the overwhelming majority of white Americans have no idea the depths of resentment and hatred directed at them by La Raza.

And most of ignorance is willful, because it is painful to face big problems when ignoring them is now an accepted behavior in our society.

White Americans have been conditioned to ignore blatant facts about the world around them.


21 posted on 06/07/2016 1:23:38 PM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
I do not intend to comment on this matter any further.

Unfortunately I will believe that when I see it.

22 posted on 06/07/2016 1:24:16 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
Nothing in there about La Raza or the National Hispanic Bar Association.

Come on, Donny ... Most of us don't really care about the merits of the case. We DO care about biased judges and anti-American racist organizations.

23 posted on 06/07/2016 1:24:29 PM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CapitalistCrusader

YES !

I think it is strategic!


24 posted on 06/07/2016 1:24:32 PM PDT by bryan999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit
The question I have: can Trump elect to have a trial by jury in this?

Yes. According to the 7th Amendment he cannot be denied one.

25 posted on 06/07/2016 1:26:59 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

His thinking is very smart. He makes a leading statement which SHOULD prompt the so-called media and journalists to dig further. He leaves it so that anyone who is really wanting to pursue this would have to research the judge, his affiliations, what the groups stand for, etc.

They would uncover for themselves the racist overtones on the groups. The only thing I wish he had mentioned in his statement would be that Sotomayer and Gonzolez are in total agreement with him.


26 posted on 06/07/2016 1:27:47 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
So the judge sets a trial date for the month of the presidential election?!

The plaintiffs wanted a trial in July, the middle of the campaign. The defense wanted a trial in February. The judge set it in late November after the election is over. A compromise between the two.

27 posted on 06/07/2016 1:29:17 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
he gets into the merits of the case a bit too much

Not at all!! It's a warning shot to any former student of Trump U who might be tempted into joining the law suit. They now know that every positive word they said about the experience is on record, and they'll be destroyed with their own words.

28 posted on 06/07/2016 1:30:25 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

The thought has occurred to me too.


29 posted on 06/07/2016 1:32:29 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Fox edited his statement down to 2 sentences.


30 posted on 06/07/2016 1:32:39 PM PDT by tirednvirginia ( But help is on the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

[He doesn’t cover the Judge’s racist memberships and ties to a La Raza Lawyers Association and the Judge’s membership in an association that is calling for a boycott of Trump businesses. He is not getting the story out and the media has simplified everything down to racism.]

He supposedly has a post-election press conference tonight. Hopefully he will do it then, when he has greater media exposure....


31 posted on 06/07/2016 1:32:46 PM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012 (q15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Remember this is the same Judge who release the documents relating to the case even before it’s court date and then the next day after everyone had them said OOPS I bad, these were marked wrong and I am sealing them again..at least that is the jest of it! So in my opinion, the judge has an issue/ax to grind!


32 posted on 06/07/2016 1:34:40 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

Uh look super white in a mixed community and the overt racism from Mexicans is constant. Only if one speaks Spanish or has known family ties to Mexican nationals or Mexican Americans might you be accepted or tolerated. If they are La Raza types, white alone or, look too white even if you are Mexican,will get you the finger.

And ask Blacks and Asians how they are treated by many Mexican Americans.


33 posted on 06/07/2016 1:34:44 PM PDT by amihow (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
I think Trump should keep the La Raza affiliated judge on his case... IF...

...the media and the oligarchy (including both parties) are perfectly fine with a KKK judge ruling on a black man's case.

There are 5000 total members in the KKK nationwide. There are over a million people in all states who are members of the racist La Raza network. They can't have it both ways.

http://www.nclr.org/affiliates/search

34 posted on 06/07/2016 1:35:21 PM PDT by Yaelle (Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
He supposedly has a post-election press conference tonight. Hopefully he will do it then, when he has greater media exposure....

In his statement he said he does not plan on commenting any further on this matter.

35 posted on 06/07/2016 1:35:41 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
He doesn't have to prove the bias of the judge, all he has to do is QUESTION whether the judge is being fair--and that is enough. Asking questions or raising the possibility of bias is not wrong.

Alberto Gonzalez, the first Hispanic Attorney General in the history of the nation, says Trump is right to question Curiel's fairness.

The media somehow has set a fake bar way way too high...a bar the media did NOT raise when Sonya Sotomayor said that ethnicity DID IN FACT affect judge's decisions!

36 posted on 06/07/2016 1:36:24 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper ((Just say no to HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

“He doesn’t cover the Judge’s racist memberships and ties to a La Raza Lawyers Association and the Judge’s membership”

I agree with you. These are easily fact-checked single element details (meaning, they do not require a conclusion which requires neural activity, they stand on their own) and as a result, the bumper stickerisms persist.


37 posted on 06/07/2016 1:36:27 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

He wants to get back to the election.

People here wanting 2 months of screaming about LaRaza are only asking him to blow precious time on their personal entertainment.

Apart from trading low rated blog stories and shaking fists at computer screens here, this whole thing was just wasting time when he has Hillary to deal with.


38 posted on 06/07/2016 1:36:30 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Prominent Republicans are now on record supporting a federal judge that favors the return of California and Arizona and Texas to Mexico


39 posted on 06/07/2016 1:38:09 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I have noticed that all the news reports and all of the discussions about Trump’s comments about the judge do not say a word about the La Raza connection. This connection reinforces Trump’s objection that the judge may be biased. If I were the defense involved in jury selection, I would have rejected Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel from the jury. Curiel’s position as the judge for the litigation, should be rejected for the same reasons.


40 posted on 06/07/2016 1:41:01 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson