Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today, June 5, 1933: FDR Ends Gold Standard, Bans Private Ownership of Gold [VIDEO]
Constitution.com ^ | June 5, 2016 | Dave Jolly

Posted on 06/05/2016 4:03:57 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Prior to the election of America’s longest serving socialist president, our money was backed by gold. Anyone holding our paper currency could demand to exchange it for gold at a set price. In 1913, the gold standard was officially made part of the Federal Reserve and the price of gold was fixed at $20.67 per ounce. The same law mandated that the Federal Reserve kept enough gold on hand to equal 40% of the currency issued at the time.

On March 4, 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was sworn into office for the first time. The day after his inauguration, Roosevelt closed all of the banks, announcing a Bank Holiday in response to the nation’s financial crisis. Many Americans had rushed to their banks and demanded to exchange their paper currency for gold and Roosevelt acted to stop the run on gold.

On March 9, 1933, Congress passed the Emergency Banking Act at the strong insistence of Roosevelt, which was so strong and swift acting that many members of Congress were not even given enough time to read the bill before having to vote on it. The act allowed for banks to reopen their doors for business after being inspected by bank examiners and found to be financially sound.

The Emergency Banking Act also gave Roosevelt a number of powers in the case of a banking crisis as defined in Title I:

“Title I expanded presidential authority during a banking crisis, including retroactive approval of the banking holiday and regulation of all banking functions, including ‘any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin.’”

According to Stephen Greene of the Federal Reserve at the time:

“The emergency banking legislation passed by the Congress today is a most constructive step toward the solution of the financial and banking difficulties which have confronted the country. The extraordinary rapidity with which this legislation was enacted by the Congress heartens and encourages the country.”

On March 13, 1933, many of the banks were allowed to reopen for business and for the most part, it appeared that the Emergency Banking Act was a success.

On April 5, 1933, acting upon the authority he assumed from the Emergency Banking Act, Roosevelt pulled all gold coins and certificates of $100 value or more to be pulled from circulation. Everyone who owned any of the gold coins, bullion or certificates worth $100 or more, were required to turn them in to the Federal Reserve by May 1, 1933. Each ounce of their gold would be exchanged for $20.67 in cash or non-gold standard certificate.

By May 10, 1933, around $300 million in gold coins and $470 million in gold certificates had been turned into the Federal Reserve.

On this day, June 5, 1933, Roosevelt, with the aid of Congress, finalized his plan to take America completely off the gold standard. No longer was our currency backed by gold. Instead, our currency was basically valued at the value placed on it by the Federal Reserve, which also played an important role in international banking and currency values. All gold coins and bullion was required to be turned over to the Federal Reserve. No private ownership of gold coins or bullion was allowed in the US.

In 1934, the federal government, now in possession of most of the gold supply in the country, raised the value of gold from $20.67 per ounce to $35 per ounce. This move was made to increase the strength of the Federal Reserve by 69%.

On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon declared that gold would no longer be set at a fixed value for the purpose of currency conversion. This allowed the price of gold to start climbing.

In 1974, the ban on ownership of gold coins or bullion ended when President Gerald Ford signed the legislation. Without any links between gold and the value of our currency, the price of gold has steadily increased to a current price of around $1,240 per ounce.

Sources for the above includes: Roosevelt’s Gold Program; FDR takes United States Off Gold Standard; Why We Left The Gold Standard; How Franklin Roosevelt Secretly Ended the Gold Standard; When Did the Gold Standard End?; Abandoned Gold Standard Guarantees Inflation; Emergency Banking Act of 1933


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: fantasyland; fdr; federalreserve; ford; gold; goldbug; goldbugs; goldstandard; nixon; ntsa; roosevelt; seizure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: BigEdLB

No, of course not

wherever money and power is the Crooked ones are right there.


21 posted on 06/05/2016 4:41:36 PM PDT by Gasshog (Clinton denies... Except to see a lot of this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They stopped making silver coins after 1964 because it was tying the dollar to a precious-metal standard.

Many who did not trust fiat were exchanging their paper dollars for silver quarters, dimes and half-dollars at the bank.

A silver dime was worth a dime in 64, today that same silver dime is worth 1.40 it buys pretty much the exact same amount of goods today as it did in 64. A Large Coke at a fountain was a dime.. today closer to 1.50

Silver and gold are real money... can’t have real money since the fed can’t play with it easily and they sure as $hit can’t print it :-)

A 2016 Silver Eagle coin will cost you about 20 dollars today. They are real legal tender with a marked value of one dollar. They have exactly one ounce of .999 silver in them and a teeny bit of copper. They are at a slight premium compared to old 90% silver coins which go for about 14 times face value.


22 posted on 06/05/2016 4:42:56 PM PDT by Bobalu (Government treats you like a milk cow. If things get tough, they will treat you like a beef cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

It made a lot of corrupt politicians and bankers very wealthy while basically setting up the destruction of this nation.

While we may notice see that as good, they do.

/spit


23 posted on 06/05/2016 4:57:24 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Yep.


24 posted on 06/05/2016 5:01:43 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

What’s that saying? Regardless of the era, a gold ounce will buy you a very nice suit. By the way, every once in a while I still find a silver coin in a roll, nice when I find a couple. Nicest is finding a silver nickel in a roll (they made them in WWII).


25 posted on 06/05/2016 5:02:54 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All


Less Than $198 To Go!!
Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


26 posted on 06/05/2016 5:14:14 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Gold holdings were a primary part of the monetary base, and the ‘bank money’ aka ‘credit money’ portion of the money supply was built on this by bank lending. Revaluation of specie from 20 to 35 had the immediate effect of increasing the monetary base by a third, allowing a larger amount of credit money to be loaned against gold holdings.

It was the ‘credit money’ portion of the money supply that had evaporated as thousands of banks failed 1930-33. The gov’t couldn’t force banks to loan and therefore rebuild the money supply, but they could increase the base of ‘high powered’ money by revaluing gold itself. Not sure if that made any difference at all other than making Americans think that FDR was stealing their gold. Of course, during the Great Depression you were lucky to have a silver dollar to your name, much less gold, but the principle was still the same.


27 posted on 06/05/2016 5:17:20 PM PDT by Pelham (Barack Obama. When being bad is not enough and only evil will do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

So even back then the c¥ck******s were using crises to impose their agenda.


28 posted on 06/05/2016 5:47:56 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

While Americans could no longer buy gold from our own government, other countries could! France in particular was famous for gathering dollars and exchanging them for gold, at the old exchange rate, then selling the gold at a higher rate. Nixon put a stop to that in what he called his most important action while president.


29 posted on 06/05/2016 5:52:55 PM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All
The first problem with FDR closing the banks is this imo. Although the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had discussed the idea of constitutionally delegating to the feds the specific power to regulate INTRAstate banking, the delegates had decided against it. This is evidenced by the following excerpt from the writings of Thomas Jefferson.
“A proposition was made to them to authorize Congress to open canals, and an amendatory one to empower them to incorporate. But the whole was rejected, and one of the reasons for rejection urged in debate was, that then they would have a power to erect a bank, which would render the great cities, where there were prejudices and jealousies on the subject, adverse to the reception of the Constitution [emphasis added].” —Jefferson’s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791.

Also, by refusing to let citizens exchange paper money for gold, FDR wrongly interfered with state sovereignty as evidenced by the Constitution’s Clause 1 of Section 10 of Article I.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts [emphasis added]; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Also consider that when citizens do business with banks, such business may be regarded as contract work, not commerce. And if such is the case, then a previous generations of justices had also clarified that contracts are not commerce, effectively indicating that Congress has no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) authority to regulate contracts regardless if the parties involved are domeciled in different states.

"4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract [emphasis added] of indemnity against loss." - Paul v. Virginia, 1869. (The corrupt feds have no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) power to regulate insurance.)

Note that both Jefferson and James Madison, Madison genererally regarded as the father of the Constitution, had warned patriots about the corrupt federal government unconstitutionally expanding its powers in small steps.

Remember in November !

When patriots elect Trump, they also need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision to make America great again, but also repeal all federal laws and executive orders that Congress cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers.

Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

30 posted on 06/05/2016 5:56:05 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ping for later.


31 posted on 06/05/2016 7:03:14 PM PDT by chit*chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

We should ask the democrat candidates how they feel about FDR banning citizens from owning gold. And forcing people to turn it in.

We should ask them how they feelcabout democrat Truman droping the bomb on Japan, just,to watch their pretzel logic make them squirm.

They bring up stuff like tis against our guys all tge time just to get the awkward response. Id love to see themstew in it and do a stuttering Obama broken teleprompter stroke out.


32 posted on 06/05/2016 9:17:41 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

And Americans IN 1933 did nothing.

WILL WE 80+ years later?


33 posted on 09/14/2016 5:11:25 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson