Posted on 06/03/2016 5:27:24 AM PDT by marktwain
They are not even getting propaganda value out of it any more.
It is pure, unadulterated, waste. Destruction for the sake of destruction.
I guess selling them to legitimate dealers who would in turn, of course, sell them to law abiding firearms owners would make too much sense.
What independent body verifies the guns were destroyed? It wouldnt surprise me if some walked home and others are used when a throw down was needed.
It is government, therefore no surprise it wastes resources.
Why no link to the to people doing the destruction?
Our local Sheriff has always auctioned guns taken from illegal owners (drug dealers, felons, etc.) to the general public. He puts a notice in the local paper with a list of some of the guns. The auction is usually held at a local church. Background checks are done but no guns are destroyed unless they are dangerous (faulty). I guess that’s the difference between Tennessee and Michigan.
Looking at the list it looks like most of the ones the destroy are POS. I bet the goon ones like the Sigs and the SWs are in the homes of some of the officers.
Goon = good
Most on this page are Rugers, Taurus, and Winchesters. Taurus may be a (small) step down from Rugers, but are generally pretty good guns.
I would bet that the average price on auction for this page would be closer to $200 than $100.
Sometime, the guns are worth more for parts than as a whole.
I asked about pre-1968 guns, many of which have no serial numbers.
I was told that all of them are destroyed.
Hey! The state went to a lot of work to get those guns out of the hands of criminally law-abiding citizens.
You don’t want to take a chance that someone might use them to protect themselves. That’s what the police are for. :)
That’s a lot of “Glocks” as the toads in the commie lib “media” calls them.
Think of it as a back-door DemonRat Welfare for the Firearms Industry. Destruction means there are fewer used firearms for sale, spurring new firearm purchases.
Unintended Consequences much?
What a cryin friggin shame. Looks like some nice stuff on that list.
Idiot gubbermint.
Some like the Mossberg "Targo" and Remigton "Mo-Skeet-O" had small traps that could throw tiny clay targets.
Those with the "Routledge" bore throw excellent patterns out to 30 feet. They even had a team.
I thought that would get your attention.
“Destroy”: Send to Mexico.....
Great old photos.
I think we are in the process or restoring/reinventing it.
Lots of pretty girls with guns on the Internet and at competitions...
I was told that all of them are destroyed.
Why not list them anyway then (with "N/A" for the serial number), just for the sake of full disclosure? Not listing them raises questions. Are they actually going home in cops' car trunks, being sold through online auctions, etc?
No serial number, no way to officially trace a firearm back to the Michigan PD.
Enjoyable! d;^)
I did not ask about magazines, telescopic sights, mounts, grips, stocks, or other parts...
Most NSN (no serial number) guns are inexpensive .22 rifles and the like. Browning, Colt, and S&W have always serial numbered their guns. Winchester on the nicer ones, with the single shot boy’s rifles and the like being NSN. For example I have 2 model 67’s that are NSN, but a 30’s vintage 57 is numbered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.