Skip to comments.
AP FACT CHECK: Clinton misstates key facts in email episode
AP ^
| 27 May 2016
| LISA LERER and CATHERINE LUCEY
Posted on 05/30/2016 6:42:54 AM PDT by Lorianne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: DaveA37
I can’t say she’ll ever pay for her sins. But, she won’t be president either. The tide of public opinion has shifted and is now strongly running against her. We’re seeing people like Andrea Mitchell turn against her. AS more people go on record swearing off Hillary, it will increase the impetus to retire her.
Electability is key. Her electability is eroding every day now that the media has lost its single minded focus in her defense and adulation.
She’s a goner. It will be up to someone high up in the hierarchy in the Democrat Party to deliver the news that she’s no longer the candidate of choice.
Hillary will suffer some sort of extreme medical development that will be the excuse for her withdrawal.
21
posted on
05/30/2016 9:05:38 AM PDT
by
meatloaf
To: georgiarat; trebb; TomGuy; GOPJ
All good comments; I was just too lazy to make them.
Also she claims the documents were not marked classified. That’s lawyer speak technically true also, because none of the documents that I’ve ever seen were marked “Classified”. Instead, they’re marked “Confidential”, “Secret”, “Top Secret”, or “Top Secret” with some special compartmentalizing stamps.
22
posted on
05/30/2016 11:09:27 AM PDT
by
libertylover
(The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
To: GOPJ
Only the American press is vile or stupid enough to buy her lies... democrats know she’s lying and pretend otherwise to fool the ‘rubes’ in flyover.
The rubes aren't in flyover country. They're the Demwits in the large east and west coast cities.
23
posted on
05/30/2016 3:40:14 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
To: libertylover
Also she claims the documents were not marked classified. That’s lawyer speak technically true also, because none of the documents that I’ve ever seen were marked “Classified”. Instead, they’re marked “Confidential”, “Secret”, “Top Secret”, or “Top Secret” with some special compartmentalizing stamps. Yep - with the actual classification markings, the "classified" may or may not be in evidence and is usually in a statement about the document containing classified data vs. being a classification marking.
24
posted on
05/31/2016 2:38:07 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Lorianne
“misstates key facts” = LIES
25
posted on
05/31/2016 2:48:55 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
To: Old Yeller
Well, THEY see us as rubes... it’s one more way for them to insult us.
26
posted on
05/31/2016 9:46:21 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
To: libertylover
“too lazy to make” - LOL - seriously funny...
27
posted on
05/31/2016 9:47:12 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson